Physical Matter is Six Simultaneous Euclidien Dimensions

[RascalPuff]

The preceding (four page) dialogue commenced in May of 2007 and went to the beginning of June, 2007; with the verbatim quote from Newton's Principia.

I am happy to say that 'Nobody' and I have since made amends and found a common ground. I dare say we have become good (if cyberspatial?) friends...

Nobody (is Somebody), by any other name, is Mr. Raven Knight, who I am pleased to say is not only a good sport, but also a very prolific resource of information. An exemplary and wide spectrum tribute to this entire forum. As I have said of him before, there's no question in my mind - and I expect the minds of many others - that he consistently proves to be excellent moderator material.

I re-engaged this feisty thread - not without levity - for what I believe is its self explanatory educational value; especially as an introduction to my work, at
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

Sincere thanks to Nobody (Raven Knight), and of course Michael and Dave (dleviwing),
I remain respectfully,
- RP

[N0B0DY]

I went through all four pages. It was quite an enjoyable learning experience, and I'm flattered that you agree. When I said "idol" I don't mean it in an idle sense. You are quite honorable imo.

Yet, there is always a yet, what jumped at me while reading was the reference to what has been proven. I agree that alot of scientists would claim focus of facts, like Dave, but proven is a big word imo and evidence is interpretational.

I for one have considered your work a great deal, and love the simplicity of it, and apologize for the hard-headedness looking back. I have a hard head absolutely filled with a void, but it remains my own.

There is no cyberspace between us friends...thanks.

[RascalPuff]

A rhubarb worth reviewing. Everybody - including Nobody - wins!

[RascalPuff]

I went through all four pages. It was quite an enjoyable learning experience, and I'm flattered that you agree. When I said "idol" I don't mean it in an idle sense. You are quite honorable imo.

Yet, there is always a yet, what jumped at me while reading was the reference to what has been proven. I agree that alot of scientists would claim focus of facts, like Dave, but proven is a big word imo and evidence is interpretational.

I for one have considered your work a great deal, and love the simplicity of it, and apologize for the hard-headedness looking back. I have a hard head absolutely filled with a void, but it remains my own.

There is no cyberspace between us friends...thanks.

An update of the issued presentation can be accessed and reviewed at
http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...ies.html?ltr=T

Best regards, with special thanks to Austin Torney and Raven Knight for their outstanding contributions.
- RP

[Dihydrogen Monoxide]

Here is why the boulder and the follicle fall at the same acceleration.
Their accelaration is dependent upon the other mass, Earth not themselves. Their mass is cancelled out.

Sheesh.

F = ma

Fg = KgmEmB/r^2

aB = Fg/mB = KgmE/r^2 <- do you see mE? that says mass of Earth. context and perspective. there's no such thing as a bird's eye view without an individual analysis.