What 'Particles'?

[RascalPuff]

Newton asserted ‘Hypothesis non fingo’. - ‘I make no hypothesis’. Yet, his entire, unarguably revolutionary Classical Mechanics was based on the hypothetical particle that science has yet to assuredly accommodate. The ‘particle concept’ that dominates physics and the vast majority of colloquial planetary human thought: has never been proven beyond hypothetical scientific retainers...

‘The (rarely) indicted ‘particle’ Isn’t found ‘wrong’ here, but rather: resiliently incomplete; so as to aggressively exclude the incumbent role of the continuous field in the balance of material considerations.- KB Robertson

Regards,
-RP
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks for the post RP/a take on the word Particle/s.

Particles
Are
Really
Thought
Indicators
Combining
Light
Essentially
Shaping/(creational physicality)=Particles.

As oceans flow with endless current,and irresistible pressure,so to does the physical
universe,irresistible pressure motions the currents of expression,"particles" are really
a misnomer and play no "real" part at all?



regards michael.