[dleviwing]

Nobody;
First of all I do not subscribe to the antimatter concepts since I know that any electron can be altered to a positron by changing its quantum energy states. A positron is only an electron condensed enough to interact constructively with normal electrons wave functions. Though academic particle physics view charge as a property of the particles, it is not; it is the wave function interactions of the environmental fields of the point particle that determine charge. Every point particle supports field structures in its surrounding environment at various harmonic states.

Let’s see if I can explain wave symmetry as it applies to particle structure. Perfect wave symmetry of a particle would mean that the substance of the particle (matter or energy; you chose) is vibrating at a single frequency. This means that for each wave cycle half of the substance is at a maximum state of motion and half of it is at a minimum state of motion; thus half is condensing to its most solid state while the other half is expanding to its least condensed state. Through each cycle, the substance passes through an instance that the standing waves disappear and the particle becomes a perfect sphere. The greater the frequency, the greater number of times this occurs. (Shorter wavelengths) A particle with perfect wave symmetry would not interact with any other particle or state of matter other than solid fundamental matter. (The state of matter prior to the Big Bang) The quantity of uniform motion of such objects is equivalent to “Absolute Motion”. (Greater than 2c) BTW: we cannot detect such a particle in this state unless it has a quantity of substance greater than all the matter in the universe; we do have the neutrino however as being the closest known perfect wave symmetry particle; it’s just not perfect though. You can view the neutrino as having the greatest uniform motion of wave symmetry and a black hole as having the greatest uniform angular motion. All linear uniform motion creates the kind of “Absolute particle” that started our universe.


This is basically what the math of M-theory is attempting to render.


To answer your last question:--- YES

[N0B0DY]

Hello again, Dave.

I have been reading your blog and find it remarkably similar to gabriel LaFreniere's work - http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm - which is based soley on electrons.

I guess your explanation can apply to any particle, the diversity being merely representative of variable states. Still, though, based on your explanation of symmetry, what I'm picturing is not a perfect sphere - unless you're referring to a photon - but a type of hyper-fine structure.

Perhaps you are able to solve what is considered to be the greatest mystery in physics using your Toronic Concept.