[RascalPuff]

Might the aether be - de facto - wave incumbency, conducting all other transmissions (transciencies), ad infinitum?

(There's a heck of a lot of unincumbered cross-fire out there, generating a very dense megafield - never mind the atoms per cubic mile... what about the stratified & cumulative photon <'wavicle'> storms?)

Does not this proposal accomodate all relevant Standard Theory?

Is not the en toto universe reducible to waves of greater or lesser lengths and density?

In consideration of what is known of wave mechanics, there seems to be no obstacle to this submission.

- RP

[mkirkpatrick]

Rascal this thread title interests me,can you please supply more detail,am most grateful
to you kindly sir.




regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

The magnetosphere shields the surface of the Earth from the charged particles of the solar wind. It is compressed on the day (Sun) side due to the force of the arriving particles, and extended on the night side. (Image not to scale.) Wikepedia.

Dear Michael:
Here we may have a ('familiar' - not entirely recognized, relatively localized, ostensibly dramatic) variation on a theme of aether as electromagnetic radiation bridge, as well as an altogether palpable force that keeps the earth - and other planets - in orbit; preventing same from spiraling into the orbital - solar systematic - locus.

(May it be said that the Sun's 'rays' have a purchase on the earth, and conversely... )

(Note that gravity - action-at-a-distance - is a <5 & 6 dimensional, electromagnetic> pushing/repelling force here, also...)

Thanks for your interest - and your British inspiration.

(Click on the image... Gotta light? <Welcome to Einstein's reinstated Unified Field /\ Lambda
& Steady State. Help Wanted: Please don't be late.>)

Best regards,
- RP
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks rascal,this magnetosphere is not the same as the aether though is it? Are you
saying that as we can more easily detect this sphere,then the study of it may provide
some clues to better understanding the aether?




regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Thanks rascal,this magnetosphere is not the same as the aether though is it? Are you saying that as we can more easily detect this sphere,then the study of it may provide some clues to better understanding the aether? regards michael.

Dear Michael:

Words (further clues? <The MultiUniverse and an endless seriatim of event horizons>)
don't count for much more, at a space-time like this.

Draw your own conclusions, my Dear Fellow Traveler.

(Time has come today. While so many patiently and interminably await
'The Big Arrival'...)

Of course it doan mean a thing, until Scientific American, The Physical Science Journal & Hollywood endorses it...

Everyone knows - a priori - reality is an illusion...
Until the Hollywood Guild authenticates it.

One of my - Austin Torney illuminated - rotating parallel universes probly slipped an explosive 4-D gear.

Clearly the illustrated phenomena is unique to our solar system and cannot apply to or accomodate microcosmic wave mechanics or macrocosmic stellar and/or galactic phenomenological scrutinization...

Ut infra, ut supra is all Greek to me...

Obviously, only magnetism is involved here, and not electricity.

No electromagnetic interval of space - or electromagnetic radiation bridge - here...

The 3rd dimension is under constant surveillance with a fine toothed comb,
with no sign of the 4th, 5th & 6th dimensions of matter, electricity or magnetism.

'The truth knocks on the door and you reply:
"Go away. I'm looking for the truth". - Robert Pirsig

('No need to get excited, the thief he kindly spoke. There are many here among us, who think life is but a joke... But you and I, we've been through that, and that is not our fate. So let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting late...
- All Along the Watchtower, Copyright 1967, Bob Dylan/Jimi Hendrix...)

Nah. Don't concern yerself with it, Michael.

Obviously I'm making all this up.

"And at the end of all our exploration, we shall arrive where we started, and know the place for the first time".
- T. S. Eliot, Four Quartets.

Experiencing a psychotic, megalomaniacal departure from reality...

Just another crack-pot flash inna pan.

(Take my word for it: believe you me.)

-----------------------

Please traverse safely, as you go abroad in 4 dimensions, taking in and celebrating the widescreen, high resolution 3-D panorama.

Drop me a mainstream endorsed, innercircle applauded, elegantly universal SuperString (numerological) line, once in a while, eh?



Best regards,
- RP

[N0B0DY]

Are we differentiating the field, aether and space here? If so, what is it exactly that makes them differrent?

Using your web or football field analogy, Michael, what is on the top of the spider or players on the field? If it is space, are we to think in terms of the aether being flat?

Also, RP, reagrding the magnetic field and rotation, is it possible for a strong magnetic field to initiate rotation of another body to create its own magnetic field, or would the body in question need to be already rotating?

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY Are we differentiating the field, aether and space here? If so, what is it exactly that makes them differrent? Using your web or football field analogy, Michael, what is on the top of the spider or players on the field? If it is space, are we to think in terms of the aether being flat? Also, RP, reagrding the magnetic field and rotation, is it possible for a strong magnetic field to initiate rotation of another body to create its own magnetic field, or would the body in question need to be already rotating?

Trouble is Nobody,we are in danger here of swallowing a camel,while holding a fly?

What shape is love? Is it flat or oval or doughnut shaped? In relative time and space
the aether is total all filling and all embracing,we live and move and have our being within
it,to talk of being under or over or even within as I have done can be misleading.

You could also say it inpinges upon all within its field,which is relatively absolute?


regards michael.

[N0B0DY]

Relatively absolute doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me, Micheal. It's like saying upwardly centered.

I can get my head around the relative comparison to love, but think of love as being sensorily-interpreted, or thought-based, not that love actually exists. Then, if you are implying that the aether is not really required for observational reality...that it essentially doesn't exist, I guess I would comply as it stands.

I think Einstein had suggested as well that the medium of aether cannot be thought of as we do physical mediums, but one where motion loses its meaning. Perhaps RP might be able to shed some light on this reference.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY Relatively absolute doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me, Micheal. It's like saying upwardly centered. I can get my head around the relative comparison to love, but think of love as being sensorily-interpreted, or thought-based, not that love actually exists. Then, if you are implying that the aether is not really required for observational reality...that it essentially doesn't exist, I guess I would comply as it stands. I think Einstein had suggested as well that the medium of aether cannot be thought of as we do physical mediums, but one where motion loses its meaning. Perhaps RP might be able to shed some light on this reference.

You are quite correct there Nobody,I admit getting a little over the top here,exaggerating
the issue,I just wanted to make the point,rather badly it seems,that the aether totally infills the entire physical universe.


regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick You are quite correct there Nobody,I admit getting a little over the top here,exaggerating the issue,I just wanted to make the point,rather badly it seems,that the aether totally infills the entire physical universe. regards michael.

Good morning Starshine, the Earth says 'Hello'.

The discriminating scientist will disregard the above - NASA originated - illustration with it's accompanying - RP narrated - text and highlighted words, which are, after all, only moniter vehicularized lines, transmitted through cyberspace via the (domino theorized?) conducting medium of aether, at issue.

In any event, whatever the reader may do, clicking on the below provided URL and perusing its contents - top to bottom on the introductory page - is emphatically discouraged by every grimly gridlocked, politically correct antagonist in Austin Torney's miraculously progressing ninja (I Ching-Tao) Epic, unfolding right here on Robert's Theory of Everything receptacle (refer, Theory of Nothing, by Nobody).

Standing (non-standard theory endorsed) 'entire physical universe infilling' invitation to 'keep the change'
(Domesticate Michael's fly and swallow his camel?).

And, btw, Michael, thanks for the thanks.

Ubiquitous regards,
- RP

http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

( P.S. Oh. Say. Can you see? )