You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 12:57 AM
Hi RP,
I got hit by a dust storm on the way home from work tonight. My eyes are still hurting from the dust particles they collected. Particles are as real as my red eyes.
= MJA
PS: Do you believe our Sun gravitates star light? I am have severe difficulty fathoming that theory of Einstein's. I believe the Sun radiates star light, its own, and cannot attracts light at the same time. What do you think? Are the eclipse experiments flawed? Thanks!
The truth of everything is less than one inch,
it is only equal and the lion is one.
One is free when the door is opened,
education has the key.
=
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJA
Hi RP,
I got hit by a dust storm on the way home from work tonight. My eyes are still hurting from the dust particles they collected. Particles are as real as my red eyes.
= MJA
PS: Do you believe our Sun gravitates star light? I am have severe difficulty fathoming that theory of Einstein's. I believe the Sun radiates star light, its own, and cannot attracts light at the same time. What do you think? Are the eclipse experiments flawed? Thanks!
___________________
Dear MJA:
The dust particles you speak of are systems of electric charges that have no distinct 'surface', separating them from surrounding space. Newtonian-conceptualized 'particles' have yet to be found or isolated.
____________________
Do you feel that the solar eclipse expedition of 1919 failed to take some (omitted) factor of observation into account?
- Best regards.
- RP
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 02:44 PM
Is it really a particle that stands before us? Is there really a difference between a wave
and a particle,and if there is,will it enhance your life any by knowing?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 03:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Is it really a particle that stands before us? Is there really a difference between a wave
and a particle,and if there is,will it enhance your life any by knowing?
regards michael.
A'particle' has traditionally presumed to have a discontinuous surface and to be the constituent building block of the entire physical universe. A particle is anticipated as being contained by a distinct 'surface', separating it from surrounding space. It doesn't look like there are any particles - but rather, surfaceless wave and field systems - 'standing before us'...
Your question of 'enhancement of life' might be appended to any of the questions and answers on this website, Michael. You know, the 'So what?' modality of dialogue busters.
Regards.
- RP
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 03:51 PM
Dearest RP,
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff
___________________
Dear MJA:
The dust particles you speak of are systems of electric charges that have no distinct 'surface', separating them from surrounding space. Newtonian-conceptualized 'particles' have yet to be found or isolated.
MJA: Then my eyes were electrocuted, ouch!
____________________
Do you feel that the solar eclipse expedition of 1919 failed to take some (omitted) factor of observation into account?
MJA: Obviously the conclusion is a natural contradiction. What was missing, RP. the enertia of the sun, or the motion of the star, the Earth, the observer, The speed of light, the flaw of measure, the true concept of light, of gravity, or was it simply all of the above? You know this history better than me, due tell.
- Best regards.
- RP
Thanks,
= MJA
The truth of everything is less than one inch,
it is only equal and the lion is one.
One is free when the door is opened,
education has the key.
=
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff
A'particle' has traditionally presumed to have a discontinuous surface and to be the constituent building block of the entire physical universe. A particle is anticipated as being contained by a distinct 'surface', separating it from surrounding space. It doesn't look like there are any particles - but rather, surfaceless wave and field systems - 'standing before us'...
Your question of 'enhancement of life' might be appended to any of the questions and answers on this website, Michael. You know, the 'So what?' modality of dialogue busters.
Regards.
- RP
I understand your point here rascal,and have taken it.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 07:27 PM
It may be chalked up as a notably extended hangover from the Newtonian celebration, Dave.
There appears to be a well established paradigm shift from 'particles' to 'waveicles' which has yet to be acknowledged.
The entrenched 'particle' vocabulary is a powerfully telling regression from that evolution.
(Einstein wasn't the only one who acquired headaches from 'particles'.)
Best regards,
- RP
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence.
Re: 'Particles' are dismissed: for lack of evidence. -
10-05-2007, 02:44 PM
Linear Mode
