Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#21 (permalink))
8th degree Black Belt
dipayankar is a jewel in the rough
 
dipayankar's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,363
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 101x in 95 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 29
   
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-12-2008, 03:29 PM

The momemt you say, Universe is finite (I guess in space), the next question that arises is what is next? What after? Is there another Universe that is starting? If no is there ether?? What is there???


Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
"The question here is where is it expanding to?? And where is it expanding from??"
- dipayankar

_____________________

Is not your question just as applicable to the incumbent dynamics of Standard Theory?

In any event, my submission is that matter is electromagnetic and it is the inherent nature of electromagnetic entities to expand; hence the title of this thread:
"Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?"

Indeed, with regard to the question: 'Where is it expanding to?'
Is not this question equally addressed to the status quo (spatially) expanding universe?

For my part, dipayankar, I refer to Einstein's statement:
"The universe is finite, but unbounded".

I interpret this to mean, finite at any given moment in space, but unbounded in time.
And that it is an ever expanding, logarithmically accelerating spiral shape...

Expanding - accelerating - from the infinite microcosms, to the infinite macrocosms.

  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#22 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 89
Thanked 81x in 77 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 21
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-13-2008, 12:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
The momemt you say, Universe is finite (I guess in space), the next question that arises is what is next? What after? Is there another Universe that is starting? If no is there ether?? What is there???
Although this rendition isn't absolutely logarithmic (otherwise it would go off the page, promptly), what I think is 'there', is more of the same expanding universe, squared...

(Special - blue shift - effects compliments of Austin Torney)




Ad infinitum, perhaps?


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#23 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 89
Thanked 81x in 77 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 21
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-14-2008, 02:45 AM

Another rendition of the dynamic structure of a finite but unbounded universe. Emerging out of microcosmic infinity, while accelerating toward macrocosmic infinity:




(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#24 (permalink))
8th degree Black Belt
dipayankar is a jewel in the rough
 
dipayankar's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,363
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 101x in 95 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 29
   
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-14-2008, 03:29 AM

RP, does an idea of a Hyperuniverse, (not multiverse) which contains our Universe much like an apartment building with multiple flats and each flat expanding / contracting within that Hyper Universe sound logical to you???

Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
Another rendition of the dynamic structure of a finite but unbounded universe. Emerging out of microcosmic infinity, while accelerating toward macrocosmic infinity:


  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dipayankar For This Useful Post:
RascalPuff (01-14-2008)
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#25 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 89
Thanked 81x in 77 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 21
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-14-2008, 10:51 AM

"RP, does an idea of a Hyperuniverse, (not multiverse) which contains our Universe much like an apartment building with multiple flats and each flat expanding / contracting within that Hyper Universe sound logical to you???"
________________________________

Yes, it does, dipayankar. And thank you for the expression - I've not previously heard it described quite that way before...


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#26 (permalink))
8th degree Black Belt
dipayankar is a jewel in the rough
 
dipayankar's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,363
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 101x in 95 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 29
   
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-15-2008, 03:02 AM

In such a case what would be the boundaries for each sub universe??




Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
"RP, does an idea of a Hyperuniverse, (not multiverse) which contains our Universe much like an apartment building with multiple flats and each flat expanding / contracting within that Hyper Universe sound logical to you???"
________________________________

Yes, it does, dipayankar. And thank you for the expression - I've not previously heard it described quite that way before...
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#27 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 89
Thanked 81x in 77 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 21
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-15-2008, 11:16 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
In such a case what would be the boundaries for each sub universe??

Optical - 'event' - horizons.


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#28 (permalink))
8th degree Black Belt
dipayankar is a jewel in the rough
 
dipayankar's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,363
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 101x in 95 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 29
   
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-16-2008, 06:45 AM

Do these event horizons shrink???

Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
Optical - 'event' - horizons.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#29 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,449
Thanks Given: 89
Thanked 81x in 77 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 21
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-16-2008, 12:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
Do these event horizons shrink???
There seems to be two schools of thought on this, dipayankar.
One that says they shrink, and another that says they expand.
I am of the latter school.
Sort of like Friedmann's equations that find Einstein's Cosmological Constant either expanding or contracting...

I find the Cosmological Constant to be what's being called 'dark energy', today. The cause of the acceleration of the expanding universe, and the cause of the (spatially) expanding universe itself. My work first predicted this in 1959.

I proffer that matter itself is expanding also.
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

Best regards,
- RP


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?
Old
  (#30 (permalink))
MJA
7th degree Black Belt
MJA is a jewel in the roughMJA is a jewel in the rough
 
MJA's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,079
Thanks Given: 155
Thanked 128x in 109 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep Power: 18
   
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? - 01-16-2008, 01:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
Optical - 'event' - horizons.
Dear RP,

Surely there are many more event horizons than optical, what about the horizon no one can see?

=
MJA


The truth of everything is less than one inch,
it is only equal and the lion is one.
One is free when the door is opened,
education has the key.
=
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com