Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-12-2008, 03:29 PM
The momemt you say, Universe is finite (I guess in space), the next question that arises is what is next? What after? Is there another Universe that is starting? If no is there ether?? What is there???
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff
"The question here is where is it expanding to?? And where is it expanding from??" - dipayankar
_____________________
Is not your question just as applicable to the incumbent dynamics of Standard Theory?
In any event, my submission is that matter is electromagnetic and it is the inherent nature of electromagnetic entities to expand; hence the title of this thread:
"Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm?"
Indeed, with regard to the question: 'Where is it expanding to?'
Is not this question equally addressed to the status quo (spatially) expanding universe?
For my part, dipayankar, I refer to Einstein's statement:
"The universe is finite, but unbounded".
I interpret this to mean, finite at any given moment in space, but unbounded in time.
And that it is an ever expanding, logarithmically accelerating spiral shape...
Expanding - accelerating - from the infinite microcosms, to the infinite macrocosms.
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-13-2008, 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar
The momemt you say, Universe is finite (I guess in space), the next question that arises is what is next? What after? Is there another Universe that is starting? If no is there ether?? What is there???
Although this rendition isn't absolutely logarithmic (otherwise it would go off the page, promptly), what I think is 'there', is more of the same expanding universe, squared...
(Special - blue shift - effects compliments of Austin Torney)
Ad infinitum, perhaps?
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-14-2008, 02:45 AM
Another rendition of the dynamic structure of a finite but unbounded universe. Emerging out of microcosmic infinity, while accelerating toward macrocosmic infinity:
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-14-2008, 03:29 AM
RP, does an idea of a Hyperuniverse, (not multiverse) which contains our Universe much like an apartment building with multiple flats and each flat expanding / contracting within that Hyper Universe sound logical to you???
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff
Another rendition of the dynamic structure of a finite but unbounded universe. Emerging out of microcosmic infinity, while accelerating toward macrocosmic infinity:
The Following User Says Thank You to dipayankar For This Useful Post:
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-14-2008, 10:51 AM
"RP, does an idea of a Hyperuniverse, (not multiverse) which contains our Universe much like an apartment building with multiple flats and each flat expanding / contracting within that Hyper Universe sound logical to you???" ________________________________
Yes, it does, dipayankar. And thank you for the expression - I've not previously heard it described quite that way before...
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-15-2008, 03:02 AM
In such a case what would be the boundaries for each sub universe??
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff
"RP, does an idea of a Hyperuniverse, (not multiverse) which contains our Universe much like an apartment building with multiple flats and each flat expanding / contracting within that Hyper Universe sound logical to you???" ________________________________
Yes, it does, dipayankar. And thank you for the expression - I've not previously heard it described quite that way before...
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-15-2008, 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar
In such a case what would be the boundaries for each sub universe??
Optical - 'event' - horizons.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Is not Motion the Dominant Paradigm? -
01-16-2008, 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar
Do these event horizons shrink???
There seems to be two schools of thought on this, dipayankar.
One that says they shrink, and another that says they expand.
I am of the latter school.
Sort of like Friedmann's equations that find Einstein's Cosmological Constant either expanding or contracting...
I find the Cosmological Constant to be what's being called 'dark energy', today. The cause of the acceleration of the expanding universe, and the cause of the (spatially) expanding universe itself. My work first predicted this in 1959.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid