[Krzysztof Michalski]

to understand the Origin well, we need to join all our knowledge together. Its not possible to explain the world well by means of mathematics, physics or philosophy separatly. If you construct good theory of everything you need first of all to keep to math and physical rule, then if you want you can make use of religious and philophosical true. You know better then me, there are many interesting thoughts about universe inside indian religion. First it affirms that we live in cyclic world, where the one mahakalpa of Brahma God life is 300 billion years, and this is so long as one wink of eye Vishnu God. The end of Brahma life means mahapralaja, solution to universe. We know also that desintegration of lead 208 is on many billion, billions years. The universe existance is the wink of eye to the lead 208 desintegration too. It is not enough to join quantum physics to Einstein theory, we need good TOE buy we need better theory of Hyperintelligence as Creator of everything too.

[gs_cmans]

Great a foreigner talking about all our religious thoughts and vedas. But still i least beleive on those things. Good to hear of you.
I think i got a new good friend to discuss all the facts about Science(TOE) and even philiosphy and argue on the mystism.

[Krzysztof Michalski]

Hi,
Iam glad to our contact too. I belive in full explanation with science, philosophy and religion at the same time. It allow to take to pieces the universe to find logic key to understand phenomenon of cosmic negation as a reason of material and spiritual creation: matter-antimatter, something-nothing, gravity-antigravity, love-hatred. Without negation neither material world nor spiritual world possible. All things need contradict in theory or in experience.

[gs_cmans]

Yes i agree, we get lot of information from the spiritual beleives which are getting unfolded in the scientific world. What i think about them is "the person who might have identified those things on early days itself might have been prohibited from saying things open. So he might have crypted the ideas into the ongoing spiritual beleives thinking surely some on will decrypt it later to use."

Whatever it is those pieces of information helps us to build theories like this.

[gs_cmans]

But Mr. Krzysztof Michalski, how come or in which way you got a chance to learn all our relegoius mystic ideas. Even i as a Hindu dont know as much as you have described. I was really wondering about this.

Infact as i dont beleive much in them i wasn't interested to go thorough them.

[Krzysztof Michalski]

I am trying to find the final answer about universe by leading material and spiritual true out and compared with themself. If modern science and cosmology say about real state of universe, as Big Bang before 13,7 billion years, objecting to thinking about state before BB, I don't agreed with them. Then I am looking for philosophical and spiritual ideas enclose to big historic civilisation so as Sumerian, Egiptian, Indian and China. They owned original cosmic ideas, that modern science have been started slowly to accept it. In indian cosmology e.g. the time is a basic principle to create the universe. The time as a round wheel with cycle of creation (sarga) and destruction (pralaja). In my conception I differentiate one impartial time with no start and no end. It is hypertime. It contains all subjective closed times, they form with local spaces diverse variants of universe. Our universe is the biggest and most attractive for reason human existence. Not much other universe has so exceptionaly genorisity. Maybe we are one-off. I think there are many dwarf universes in whole cosmos. Isaak Newton confessed absolute universe with absolute time and space. He was wrong. There is an infinite cosmos with the main material structure as a dark matter and a dark energy with light matter and energy inside, and they are only cosmic island enlarged by expanding space. The great ancient civilisations were not able to create correct science model of cosmos theory due to fantastic and surreal thinking. I observe the same slow process in moderne science. We begin to stay in the similar view point. They were belived too much in God, we have been belived too much in modern science. We need to choose the gold standard.

[gs_cmans]

Sure i agree there is vast amount of information regarding cosmos in religious beleives that at times matches with truth.
But if you disagree with science for simple reason that some one had said there was nothing before BIGBANG, then you must think of the fact that same applies in religious culture also-"What was before GOD".
Ok present theories migth not be able to say the exact answer convinicing. We scientists should explore things much better for the future.

[Krzysztof Michalski]

another God...

[gs_cmans]

Then above that GOD is it another one
So like
Lt d(GOD)/dx
x->Infinity

Did you understand the catostraphie that exists even in religious ideas. Yes ofcourse science also struggles with that only. Atlest in Quantum Electro Dynamics Prof. Richard Feynman(my lovely genius) had brought the concept of renormalization to kill the occurances of infinities. Any way that is a different context.

[Krzysztof Michalski]

I have heard about Feynman's concept. I agree, all particles have all possible options in their space-time with probability calculation. We ought to know initial conditions to determine quantum state of universe. As a sociologist I know, that we live in strongly mixed world, where some things appear like real and logic or absurd from the other side. Fast everything has double properties, nothing is sure. There is strange logic inside the universe: unvisible dark matter, black holes, overlight speed of space and the strangest universe's idea: an infinitly density of matter and infinitly temperature of energy? But then at first was a pea, it means real creation, not virtual or metaphysical ?