Was Einstein Wrong?

[Max™]

You mentioned the speed of light as a constant.

Technically, Einstein says to assume that the speed of light is a constant as it was customary to do so at the time he wrote the paper, and working from that explains motion through time being related to motion through space.

[munty13]

Einstein was perplexed as to what was missing from his "theory of everything". He knew something was missing which would not allow him to finish it. He couldn't quite place his finger on it. To understand what it is that Einstein overlooked you have to turn around in your own skin.

Science has failed to question the observer. An entire elaborate and complex process of how the brain processes, and cognises reality has been completely dismissed from the Theory of Relativity.

My simple experiment proves the speed of light in a vacuum is not a constant. The speed of light in a vacuum infers the rate at which the brain processes the speed of light in a vacuum. It's showing the speeds at which the brain works when it processes, and cognises the motion of energy. And what is exposed, at a very fundamental level, is that time does not exist.

"In his patent No. 787,412, filed May 16, 1900, Tesla showed that the current of his transmitter passed over the earth's surface with a speed of 292,830 miles per second, while radio waves proceed with the velocity of light Tesla holds, however, that our present "radio" waves are not true Hertzian waves, but really sound waves."
http://www.rastko.org.yu/rastko/delo/10868

Science so far has determined the maximum speed of light is 186, 300 miles per second. Tesla claimed to have sent signals at 1.5 times this speed. There's no magic here. He simply propagated an electromagnetic wave which had a greater velocity than 186, 300 miles per second. It's obvious Tesla understood the existence of super-extremely low frequencies (those frequencies below 0Hz).

[Max™]

I'm actually fairly sure why Einstein never finished his ToE, it's because he didn't want to consider a Universe which wasn't totally Causal and Local.

As I've mentioned before, there is a constant in his equations which he chose for no other reason than aesthetic ones. That being the rate of time constant, which he set to equal 1 (or accurate if you will) at infinite distance from a body with mass.

It may not seem like much, but in doing that, he effectively set an absolute limit on the ways things can interact with time. Preserving Causality, but in a way which I believe never satisfied him.


Adjust that constant, and Relativity suggests behaviors for low mass bodies which perfectly explains the weirdness of quantum mechanics.

[munty13]

My experiment shows that the speed of light in a vacuum is not a constant. The next question which arises is - why is the speed of light 300,000 km/s in a vacuum?

[Max™]

First: publish results of your experiment, and means to replicate it.

Then compare the results which are found by moving observers.

[munty13]

"....there is a constant in his equations which he chose for no other reason than aesthetic ones."

The speed of light as a constant is incredibly restrictive. Einstein may only have chosen it for aesthetic reasons, but the result has been one that chokes, and cuckholds physics.

"First: publish results of your experiment, and means to replicate it."

Well, you got me there. I wouldn't know where to begin. But I don't think you have to go as far as setting the whole thing up in a lab. It's an experiment which asks only for a bit of imagination.

Imagine yourself being big, I mean planet big, and think about how the distance between your neurons would have increased. Signals travelling between neurons will take much longer to be sent and recieved. It would now take you much longer to produce a thought. Imagine watching our solar system, and seeing the planets practically whiz by in a blur. Who knows how many days would have passed on the Earth - in the time it would have taken you to read this one paragraph?

Then imagine yourself small - atomically small. The distance between neurons has now dramatically decreased. Now the thoughts take place much, much faster than normal.

No matter what size you are, the metronome of your thoughts will always dictate reality as a normal experience. Thoughts dictate the concept of time. What these armchair experiments prove is that time is simply an experience. Time is not a function of the Universe. Time is man-made.

[Max™]

You're confusing observed time with actual time.

The speed of light is not the constant I am referring to, that one is a measured value.

[munty13]

"You're confusing observed time with actual time."

But there's no such thing as time- either observed or actual. It's an illusion. We watch the clock on the wall to tell us the time. Tick follows tock.

Imagine we are in a room together (don't get any ideas!). I have been shrunk to a size so small, that the distance travelled by signals in my brain is incredibly less. My rate of perception is a 1000 times faster than yours. We're in a room together. Someone walks in and flicks the light off and then back on. For you the darkness would have lasted one second. I experienced the darkness for 1000 seconds (16 minutes). I couldn't even read a book.

If there was a clock on the wall, you could watch a second pass in the blink of an eye. Me? I would have to count to a thousand before I saw that exact same secondhand move.

[SCarter]

Hi there! I recived some e-mails from NASA talking about some research that is being done trying to disprove Einstein's theory too. I'm not necissarily for it, but for the advancement of science- sure. Basically they were looking at high energy gamma-rays that would move faster than lower energy photons due to a "foamy" space-time. I did not really get it- but its out there.

[G_burnett]

I have satisfied myself with an understanding of space time with the observation that we are connected to the all and thus in varied motion measured in the heading of relative time we all exist. A tree breaths once a day in an out dependent on the dark and light available, we do so more rapid but we both breath in the space of time relative to life.

It is the motion we dare to use as a constant to give value to life as the speed of light packets motion through a given measure of period through space. the spookiness effect is indicative that we have not faster then light motion but instantaneity effect over the full packet measure. IMHO Kind regards graham

afterthought the question must be asked with no preconceived idea learned or asked with objectivity despite the observation or else you just state what the answer is in spite of the observation. ... worth elaborating here i think from another posting I made on this... g