Unified Field Theories - unification of gravity field with the electromagnetic field.

[Mavriche Adrian]

Hi,


I’m from Romania and I want to propose to debate my theory.
(My English is not very good - I did at school French and Russian only)
Tank you for your understanding.

Yours Faithfully, A.M.


Unified Field Theories - unification of gravity field with the electromagnetic field.



Imagine you Universe a "U" where it exist only the Observer "A" found in a box, equipped with various devices for testing and observation, together with an electric field (electrical charge jointly with floor box), and in one another box observer "B" has the same experimentation and observation apparatus, situated at a considerable distance one from the other. The two observers communicate between them using two devices, which don’t influence the experiment.
Initially, those two are rest one from other.
Communicating between them, will by:
-- Observer A to B: I observe (I detect) only an electric field in this universe.
-- Observer B to A: I observe also only an electric field in this universe.
Consequently, the two, observe only a single phenomenon in the whole universe - an electric field. Without a light source, they will not be able to see between them.
At a given moment, the box to begins to move with a constant acceleration towards the observer B (how, it doesn’t matter).
After a time (say ten seconds from the accelerated movement of box), the exchange of information between the two will be:
-- Observer B to A: - I doesn’t know what you see, but for me things have changed and now observe an electromagnetic field with the accelerated source.
-- Observer A to B: - And to me things have changed. Someone introduced me with the boxed in a field of acceleration. For this field of acceleration, I have two explanations:
1). -- Box in which I am (along with appliances testing and observation and electric field) is accelerated;
-- 2). -- I was introduced with the box in a gravity field.
The principle of equivalence says that I can’t make a distinction between these two cases.
-- Observer B to A: - If things stay for you like that, it means that in order to explain the apparition of electromagnetic field with the accelerated source, the principle of equivalence do to have two cases equivalent between them:
1). -- When your box is accelerated, normal case (if an electric field is accelerated, it will radiation an electromagnetic field with the accelerated source);
-- 2). -- when you (box and electric field) have been introduced in to gravity field, very interesting case. If you (box and electric field) have been introduced in a gravity field, and I observe (I detect) the apparition of the electromagnetic field with the accelerated source, means that this new field that I see it, is actually the result of interactions between the electric field with gravitational field. Therefore, can say that an ensemble field of gravity with an electric field generates an electromagnetic field with the accelerated source. That is:

gravitational field + electric field = electromagnetic field with the accelerated source

This represents "Unification Theory of the Electromagnetic Field with the Gravitational Field (TUCEG).
The principle of equivalence says that I can’t make a distinction between the two cases (1 and 2).
Mach said that accelerations "felt" from a corps, it’s the gravitational attraction exerted by all the mass in the Universe on that corps. That means that gravity "generates" acceleration - accelerations doesn’t exist without gravity. So the two cases (1 and 2), is reduced to one. Therefore, the case connect to the gravity is real case.
But, because is an equality, terms on the left should describe the same thing as the right of the equality. So to say that an assembly of gravity field with an electric field generates an electromagnetic field with accelerated source, it’s the same to say you can’t make a distinction between assembly of gravity field with an electric field (I called him electro-gravitational field) and (towards) an electromagnetic field with the accelerated source. Therefore the two fields are equivalent.
We can observe also who sees the left side of the equality member (gravity field + electric field) doesn’t see the right (electromagnetic field with accelerated source).
Because equivalence between an acceleration field and gravity field is local, this character is transmitted to T.U.C.E.G.
To understand those stated above, it will call another mental experiment:
We take a disc large enough so as to bear to have an observer X jointly with him.
This disc is divided equally in two colors - yellow and blue.
Suspended somewhere above the disc, there is another observer Y, that he sees the disk and the colors on him, but he didn’t sees the observer X.
At initial, the two observations will be:
- observer X to Y - I see a disc divided into two colors, yellow and blue;
- observer X to Y - I see a disc divided into two colors, yellow and blue, that means seeing the same thing, blue + yellow = blue + yellow.
At one point the disc begins to rotate around the imaginary center, and the two observations will be:
- observer X to Y - I see a disc divided into two colors, generates I saw initially, but has also appeared as a field of acceleration, which I feel;
- observer X to Y - I see a colored disk in a single color - green. I think actually seeing the result of interactions between the field of acceleration and the two colors. That is, equality has changed now and we now have blue + yellow (which we noticed initially) + field of acceleration (which you feel) = (generates) green (which I see it).
So, the two say that blue + yellow + field of acceleration (mixture) generates green, but notice that one can say yellow + blue + field of acceleration (mixture) is equivalent to the green. The two see the same thing but describe it differently (described in two different ways the same phenomenon).
T.R.R. tells us that the space generates time.
T.R.G. say that a gravitational field is equivalent to a field of acceleration, but also it (the theory) we say that field of acceleration generates a gravitational field and gravitational field generates acceleration.
T.U.C.E.G. says electrical charge in a gravity field generates an electromagnetic field, but it also shows that the assembly of gravitational field with an electric field generates electromagnetic field with the accelerated source.

As a conclusion, one can say that the allegations from two different observers (one in the gravity field and other outside influence), it is inferred that the electromagnetic field has a relative existence. Electromagnetic field and the electro-gravity, is in fact two different manifestations of a single force. These two manifestations of this unique force have a dual and complementary at the same time they we can ever be observed simultaneously. This theory succeeds to unify gravity field with the electromagnetic has the confirmation the shift towards red or blue the stellar lights, and unifies mechanical generalized relativity with quantum mechanics.

[Cubola Zaruka]

The expansion of the universe is accelerating because larger universes have higher entropy than smaller universes. Gravity is the deceleration of the expansion of the universe. The equivalence principle does not explain all of the differences. Gravity and electromagnetism have different strengths (a small magnet can have more effect on a paperclip than the gravity of the entire earth) and gravity is always attractive. Another difference is that gravitational strength decreases with the square of distance whereas electromagnetism decreases with the cube of distance.