Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothing.
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothing.
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
4th degree Black Belt
Fredrick is a jewel in the rough
 
Fredrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 80x in 68 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 23
   
Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothing. - 05-16-2004, 04:37 PM

There are two prime structures vying to be the template for a theory of everything: one is a structure that contains unification and the other is a structure in which unification is absent. The difference between both structures hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if it is fundamental. Mathematical evidence is delivered in 'In Search of a Cyclops' that is available for free online:
http://www.pentapublishing.com
There is a synopsis link on this page.

Reactions can be send through the email link of Penta Publising.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothin
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Rybo is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
Re: Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothin - 05-22-2004, 09:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrick
There are two prime structures vying to be the template for a theory of everything: one is a structure that contains unification and the other is a structure in which unification is absent. The difference between both structures hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if it is fundamental. Mathematical evidence is delivered in 'In Search of a Cyclops' that is available for free online:
http://www.pentapublishing.com
There is a synopsis link on this page.
Reactions can be send through the email link of Penta Publising.
Fredrick, Nothing is nothing and is beyond the fluctuating finite boundaries of physical Unvierse, however, we can bring a tetrahedron to zero volume while matintainting its four triangular planes and define the cubo-octahedron a.k.a the Vector Equlibrium, or GoG,-- i.e. the God{es} of Geometry and is pregnat with an internal 13th sphere -- or as the geomtrical Euclidean Operating System of Universe, that also is known for its metaphysical absence in physical reality ergo the equilibrious zero pulsational system/theater that awaits the disequilibrious energetic pulsation of a dynamicall in-motion over-time physical Universe.

Please see http://home.usit.net/~rybo6/rybo/

Rybo


Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothin
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
4th degree Black Belt
Fredrick is a jewel in the rough
 
Fredrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 80x in 68 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 23
   
Re: Mathematical evidence about fundamental nature of nothin - 10-23-2004, 09:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybo
Fredrick, Nothing is nothing
Dear Rybo,

Thanks for your answer. Your site looks very impressive. I am going to look into it a little more later. Right now I just want to mention that the most important experiences a human being can have that has the most profond impact on a person's life have all to do with separation: birth, divorce, death.

Separation is factually almost non-scientific (what evidence is there really?) yet is ranks highest in our human experiences. To call divorce and death nothings does not feel right to me.

God is another factual nothing. There is no proof there is a god (or that there are gods) and yet for many their religious certainties are as vital as their daily food.

I do not mind that you say that nothing is nothing, because that is correct, but it needs to be clarified that nothing can be the most profound experience - ever - in your own life. Nothing can be the most fundamental aspect of life - of our universe. The basis for the existence of our universe may be the requirement of an initial separation.

As such I repeat what I said earlier. There is a choice to be made. Either the platform of everything is a unified platform where somehow a link exists between everything or the platform of everything that is a platform with a place for nothing centerstage.

Imagine the occurence of the Big Bang as the result of a region that was first under high pressure, like for instance the pressure that exists inside a full-blown balloon. When it pops the compressed airmolecules all move outwardly. All move, that is, except for the ones in the dead heat middle. They budge, move a tiny bit or even sit absolutely still while everywhere around them the airmolecules move outwardly. The center may not move.

If movement is required for materialization and the Big Bang did take place after an initial pressurized area collapsed than the center of that pressured area did not materialize (initially). In this idea, nothing is a vital part of our universe.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Orange Belt
Rybo is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 16
   
10-23-2004, 09:51 PM

Fredrick, Sorry but imn sick currently and not sure i will have the time to get back to you when im better. I keep mail for awhile see what happens.

Rybo


Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Get better!
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
4th degree Black Belt
Fredrick is a jewel in the rough
 
Fredrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 80x in 68 Posts
Join Date: May 2004
Rep Power: 23
   
Get better! - 10-23-2004, 11:00 PM

Whatever the reason you are sick, Rybo, I hope you take good care of yourself and get some good rest. Nothing more important than getting yourself back on track. I hope you'll soon feel better.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Introduction to 'The Sentient-Centered Theory Of Metaphysics' (SCTOM) mjgeddes Your TOE Theory 10 02-03-2008 06:44 AM
The History of the TOE kazikq Philosophy Articles 6 01-28-2008 09:04 PM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com