[vacuum-mechanics]

COPLETING EINSTEIN GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY

Einstein general theory of relativity (GTR) and special theory of relativity (STR) both were criticized for their PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS. Of course we have to accept their predictability and accuracy, but could we do something which will improve them? The answer is yes we could, but how? Let us see how to do it.

We knew that GTR is the consequence of STR plus the principle of equivalence. Also we known that GTR was subject to additional criticize for being unnatural, how could we visualize the appearance of the curve space if the space is NOTHING? What is the mechanism of it? Surprisingly, if we modify GTR by using “VACUUM MECHANICS” (the mechanism of vacuum medium) then we could easily explain the appearance of the curve space.

First we will conclude the problems with STR, and how we could explain them in a simple way. (Please refer to article “Completing Einstein special theory of relativity” which also present in this website). The main problems of STR are the increasing mass, length contraction and time dilation of the object when it is moving (close to the velocity of light). The question is what is the CAUSE of these effects, why it is something like that? No one can understand and can explain clearly. After we modify it by using concept of vacuum mechanics, we found that all the problems could be ELIMINATED!

Historically STR was born with the concept of nonexistence of ether, and this is the starting point of the entire problems. And after we have proved that vacuum space is not a blank space (by using a simple experiment with two solenoids), but instead it is the space that created out of structural gravitational potential energy. So vacuum space was born with VACUUM MEDIUM itself. And we may say that it is THE FABRIC STRUCTURE OF VACUUM SPACE!

Now we will consider what involve with GTR in detail. First we will concentrate on the assumption of the principle of equivalence. This says that a particle moving in geodesic path equivalence to resting in gravitational field. But we can see clearly that it is NOT CORRECT. For example, an accelerating electron will radiate, while it is not when staying rest in gravitation. This is easy to understand using vacuum mechanics concept. It is because the accelerating electron DISTURBS the existing vacuum medium, then CREATING radiating waves in front of it.

Second we will consider the problem of “CURVE SPACE” which was predicted by GTR. Even it was verified by observing the traveling of the light ray bending near the sun. But this is easier to be explained by Newton’s gravitational theory. Instead no one could understand how the curve space is (while space is not a physical entity). When we modify GTR with concept of vacuum mechanics, we will found that it is easy to understand the phenomenon of bending of light ray. The reason is because the existing of vacuum medium around the massive mass. Under the attraction of massive mass, the internal stress (or density) of vacuum medium closer to the mass will be higher than at far away. So this is the CAUSE of bending light ray (the same thing as the bending light ray traveling from air to water).

Lastly, using vacuum mechanics concept, the problems of “missing matter” and “dark matter” could be EXPLAINED easily. And it is understandable that the mentioned matters are vacuum medium itself.

Up to now we could touch the way for improving GTR and then COMPLETING it, couldn’t we? Actually there are tremendous things to talk about this matter. More detail is explained in the paper “Vacuum Mechanics a New Approach to The Theory of Everything”, which is now presented in http://www.vacuum-mechanics.com. By the way, I have to talk something about one purpose of this article before closing. Anyone who involved in the field of this subject could be felt that now there are more and more people who are unhappy with Einstein’s theory. In my opinion it is better to talk about this thing seriously. And it should be better to do something to settle the conflict in order to celebrate “Einstein’s 100 Years” with UNESCO, shouldn’t we?

--------------------