COPLETING EINSTEIN SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
Everyone who familiar with Einstein special theory of relativity (STR) would found that it was criticized for PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS. Of course we have to accept their predictability and accuracy, but could we do something which will improve it? The answer is yes we could, but how? Let us try to do together.
.
The main problems of STR are the increasing mass, length contraction and time dilation of the object when it is moving (close to the velocity of light). The question is WHAT IS THE CAUSE of these effects, why it is something like that? No one can understand and can explain clearly. To find out what was wrong with them, we have to look a little back to the past.
Historically STR was born to solve the problems in electrodynamics, which was not work properly in the realm of Newton classical mechanics. And before Einstein created STR, there was a long debate about the existing of the hypothetical ether in the vacuum space. Because in that day there was no obvious way for PROVING THE EXISTENCE of ether (or something) in the vacuum space. So people believed in STR which was no need the ether for its concept.
Up to now, when quantum mechanical theory is dominant, it is require something in vacuum space; the zero point energy. So the number of people who return to the concept of ether is increasing, and they have tried to show that there was something wrong with STR. But to do that they have to OFFER SOMETHING BETTER than the old one. Now we will try to do thing like that.
When we reconsider closer in the detail of physiological problem in STR mentioned above, for example the increasing of an object’s mass when it is moving. We will found that actually this increasing of mass is AGAIST the law of conservation of energy. So to maintain the law conservation of energy, they have INVENTED the relativistic energy and relativistic momentum (in the standard conventional procedure for proving the increasing of mass by using the collision experiment of two elastic balls).
Now let’s suppose that if we could do an experimental prove for the existence of “something” in the vacuum space, what follow is the solution for a better STR. Why? The answer is that we could go back to use the concept analogous to the old concept of ether for improving STR. Actually anyone who studied the history of the ether would found that A. H. Lorentz had derived the famous Lorentz transformation equation (use in STR)by using ETHER CONCEPT.
.
To solve the problem, for example the increasing of a moving mass mentioned. We can use the hydrodynamics theory for the moving object through “something”. Then it is easy to found that the increasing of the moving mass is not the KINETIC EFFECT as formerly believed. But it is a DYNAMIC EFFECT of “something” that resistant to the moving object. So we could improve STR just only by changing the concept, then we would get better explanation for the increasing mass and completing STR.
You may ask, are we going back to ether theory? The answer is yes and no. Yes; we are returning to the general concept analogous to the concept of the old ether. But no; it is not the old ether which filled vacuum space that we are talking. But it is the vacuum space medium itself; It is THE FABRIC STRUCTURE OF VACUUM SPACE. It means that vacuum space is not a blank space, but it is the space that was formed or created out of “something”. Something which we are talking was existed with the vacuum space – it is the “geometrical structural gravitational potential energy” of vacuum space and we will call it as vacuum medium.
Now we will prove for the existence of the mentioned “VACUUM MEDIUM” with a simple experiment using two nearly identical solenoids. One solenoid which has a little smaller in its diameter is inserted in the bigger one. If both solenoids are feed with equal amount of direct currents from two identical power sources, what will happen is as follow; If the two feeding current’s polarity are the same, we will get the magnetic field both inside and outside the solenoids. The appearing magnetic field density generated is twice comparing to one solenoid, which is what it should be. But when we reverse the polarity of one of the feeding current then the magnetic field generated will disappear. You may say that it is what it should be, yes it is. But where is the generated energy gone? It can not be something like that! Because we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids. Is it means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy? Of course not, we can not do something like that. The only ONE SENSIBLE EXPLANATION is that there is a cancellation of the opposite phase of the twisting stress in the vacuum medium, isn’t it?
Up to now we could touch the way for improving special theory of relativity and then completing it, couldn’t we? Actually there are tremendous thing to talk about the matter. More detail is explained in the paper “Vacuum Mechanics a New Approach to The Theory of Everything”, which is now presented in
http://www.vacuum-mechanics.com.
---------------