ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-23-2005, 05:14 PM
Volantis,

Thanks for the answers. I still haven't read the paper but I'm starting now.
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
The Observer

dleviwing's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,951
Blog Entries: 5
41 dleviwing is a name known to alldleviwing is a name known to alldleviwing is a name known to all
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-23-2005, 05:18 PM
volantis;
Since you are asking for a detailed critique of the "Secrets of the Aether" I will make an attempt to provide some of the answers you should have already been aware of as an Aetherist.

Aether and the Aether unit:
You are right in that there is a fundamental unit of the Aether. QM refers to it as the Quantum unity particle. I like to call it QUP ( pronounced cup).
This unit however dose not have a charge nor is it dispersed throughout the universe as the particle structure of space. It is as you say the fundamental unit of all atomic and subatomic structures.

The angular motion you suggest, produces the first unit of mass (Planck's mass unit) Mass is produced when the motion of matter becomes uniform. Angular momentum is ambiguous at this level since momentum (p) is the product of mass and velocity. The perception of mass as being a measured quantity (dimension) of matter is misrepresented. Mass is caused by the quantity of uniform motion possessed by an object and not a true measure of the quantity of matter (Aether). It is the potential energy term for matter. If you brake down Einstein's equation, he is simply saying energy is equal to energy. It dose show however that accelerating (linear uniform motion) an object will cause the mass value (Relative mass) to increase. If our rest mass values for the fundamental elementary particle do not take into account all the possible sources of uniform motion, then there is a fundamental error when using rest mass to define matter quantity.

Angular spin of the QUP however dose produce an interaction with the environmental Aether such to allow the natural bonding property of matter to weakly interact with its environmental Aether to produce a magnetic moment character. (if this is what you are referring to as charge you are on the right track) However particle structure is not the only action to produce magnetic moments. Aether electromagnetic waves are another source and thus we have what some refer to as "Vacuum Energy".

Matter only has 2 fundamental properties; motion and bonding properties. We cannot change the total quantity of motion; but we can change how it is distributed.
EXAMPLE:
If all the matter of the universe where collected such that all motions where converted to linear velocity, we would obtain a fixed value. Let's call this Vt.
All quantities of Aether that become autonomous most have this same value of total motion.
Wave interactions randomize motion preventing us from obtaining a measured quantity for random motion (Vr). We can however, measure uniform motion (Vu) and we know that the sum of the random motion and the uniform motion of all structured objects must equal the same value we would obtain in the example above. Only quantity of matter can change; total quantity of motion is fixed; thus the conservation laws remain in tact.

( Vt = Vr + Vu) This is the primary key your theory is missing and why it is incomplete.

The Theory of Relativity uses the value 2C as the Vt value.
Most of Quantum Mechanics us 4C for Vt.

The Big Bang Theory places Vt at about 10^11C.

It would appear that "Absolute motion cannot be determined" to quote a phrase.

If it is your intent to create a gauge theory with the Aether as its base, by all means proceed with my best wishes. Please do not claim it to be better than existing Standard Models or that it solves any problems with these gauge theories. The mathematics of the Standard Models are scaled and manipulate such to remove the need to account for the Aether. I have no objection if you would like to force the academic community to put the Aether back into the soup. You are right in that it will make understanding theoretical physics much easier

Would you care to continue into the cause of gravity, charge, particle structures, or any other topic.
Reply With Quote
dleviwing is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
single math misunderstanding AntonioLao Philosophy of Math 46 03-11-2006 11:54 AM
Aether Physics Model bschimer TOE Theories 20 10-12-2005 05:47 AM
A New Foundation for Physics volantis TOE Theories 5 09-17-2005 09:32 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.