"LOOKING FOR THE WRONG PARTICLE AT THE WRONG PLACE"

humanbydefault · 10:59 AM

"THE SEARCHING FOR GOD'S PARTICLE: ...is it another joke?"

Let me quote this thoughts from a book titled "Recent advances and issues in physics" [David E. Newton]:
"It is sometimes easy to take the most fundamental ideas of all for granted. Mass is an example. Almost everyone understands the concept of mass... but the interesting question one might ask about mass is, "WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?" [end of quote].
I'm aware that we all must know such fact pretty well, we just keep forgetting all the time and I'll tell you why next as the quote continues:
"In fact, one of the intriguing points about modern physical theories is that THERE IS NOTHING IN THOSE THEORIES THAT ACCOUNTS FOR THE PROPERTY WE KNOW AS MASS..." [the capital letters are mine as you may have guessed by now]... "The equations of quantum chromodynamics (qcd), for example, fully account for the behavior of fundamental particles without imputing to them the properties of mass..."
I agree 100% with such assestement [as Dr. Feynman wrote once "...is a fundamental question" and a big problem we are facing in today's physics].
Those who have read some of my articles could have seen why I have placed so much attention to that especific aspect of physics...
In 1960 a Scottish physicist called Peter Higgs suggested the existence of an electromagnetic field that permeats all space. He thought that as particles [since he still believe in the existence of particles as an inherent entity] travel though space, they gain mass from the Higg's field. The problem with Higg's field is that it appears to have NO PROPERTIES at all. [In my personal opinion "a vey convenient aspect of his proposal"] Anyway! Physicists are trying to approach the problem from a different angle.
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THIS... According to QM every field has a corresponding particle right? right! and viceversa too. QM PLACES no distintion between fields and particles. A photon traveling across space could [according to QM PLEASE!] BEHAVE AS A PARTICLE OR AS A WAVE. According with Higg's hypothesis [since is not being proved yet and it won't as I see it] God's particle or "his boson" is an unusual one. It lacks ALL of the other characteristic properties of "particles" [such a spin and charge]. It's mass has been estimated to be as big as one atom. [from an atom of iron to an atom of uranium]. But the reason I found this search INCOMPREHENSIBLE is the fact that such "huge particle" they are looking for is MADE OUT of PURE MASS.
NOW! THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO PROVE MY THEORY, MY ATOMIC MODEL AND THE REST OF CONCEPTS I HAVE CAME UP WITH IN MY WORK... WRONG!
Think about it for a second! If they found God's particle I'm out of the game for ever!
I have proposed a physical REALITY [both in my book and in my articles and posting in the past] where MASS is not coming from any field but it is present in the vacuum. My MASS is no different than ash or dust for that matter. I called it "DARK MASS" and I posted for the first time in my article titled "The Young experiment"... my first here.
I made clear to all of you [and potential readers of my book] that mass is part of the "equation" of MATTER as a FTL [faster than light] intervention of the UNIVERSE avoiding the possible appearance of a PERFECT AND FORBIDDEN VACUUM. It's not a secret for any of us that the fundamental different between ENERGY and "particles" is that the first ones could cancel each other out in space. It also means that two opposite waves with equal intensity, phase and frequency simply disappear from the "screen." Of course we are used to think in "two dimensional terms" instead of 3D. Waves in reality are not those perfect mathematical sinusoinds they teach you in high school. It's is my theory that as two waves "facing each other" in space with the kind of huge energy of the beginning of the universe could produce such an instantaneous vacuum in the fabric of space that forces the universe to "push" MASS into the forming "emptiness." We speak about how ENERGY always look for the lower energy-state trying to save what's left of it. It's not ENERGY itself what promotes such behavior, but "the greatest entity" of all: THE UNIVERSE. How the UNIVERSE helps himself in trying to achieve such a task? We have had the answer to that since the very beginnings of our evolutionary state of progress as human beings: MUSIC.
The MOST important phenomenon observed in acoustics is the pattern of interference called STANDING WAVES. QM is not entirely alien to the application of the concept since we all know De broglie idea to adapt it into electron orbitals. Something that "gave birth" later on to the "Pauli exclusion principle."
STOP YOUR READINGS RIGHT HERE AND DO YOURSELF A FAVOR!
Sign off this page and search in the NET the pattern of standing waves! [you could come back at any time and continue later with this] If you don't see a rotational pattern... A sort of spinning of harmonic as the result of two confronting waves you don't have to believe a word of what I'm saying here!
WHAT A PERFECT SOLUTION THE UNIVERSE FOUND TO SAVE ITS OVERALL ENERGY! By confronting each speck of radiation with others around IT found a pattern that will keep both energy specks from an eventual dispersion of its internal resources and at the same time a way to arrange them in different couplings according to an INFINITE number of those bondings.
I'll let you with your research for a time being... My next post right here will keep exploring the arguments I have expressed all this time.

HUMANBYDEFAULT
www.humanbydefault.com [part of my book's excerpt free to the public touches this specific part of my theory]

HUMANBYDEFAULT

dleviwing · 10-18-2005, 02:49 PM

Your publisher web-page posts your book as:
Subject: FICTION / Science Fiction / General

Are you stating that it is otherwise?

humanbydefault · 10:51 AM

You first reaction would be to believe that I'm trying to contradict the father of modern physics. I have said many times that I agree 100% in the notion of ENERGY-MASS proportionality in physcial magnitude only. Those who visited [as I proposed in my first post here] standing waves, may have realized that a higher interference between two confronting energies would reasult in a greater need of MASS to avoid a forming vacuum during SPIN.
Since Einstein's theories were based on a reality built upon "particles" and "messenger particles" used as glue, I could see that he never included the pattern of interference mentioned above into the atomic model at all.
THE NEXT QUESTION IS "COULD MASS ALONE EXIST IN THE VACUUM?"
My answer to that is: ABSOLUTELY NOT! IT IS AN ABSURD AND INCOMPLETE PICTURE OF MATTER AND ITS NATURE!

Einstein arrived to the right answer by asking himself the wrong question. If ENERGY SCATTERING inside the atom would follow a decrease in overall mass the logical deduction was that MASS had been transformed into ENERGY. He was following an entirely logical line of thinking. The problem with it is that he believed that physics was LOCAL and could be otherwise in the time periond he developed great part of his work. The ENERGY saved in bondings is not hiden in the form of mass but inside those tiny specks of radiation responsible for the existence of MATTER. It is precisely the non-stop process and continuing search for bondings [lower energy-states] what perpetuates the existence of the PATTERN [standing nuclear waves in my theory]. The process is not LOCAL as Einstein thought back then, but NON-LOCAL. The best evidence of such statement is the impossibility of "PROTONS" TO DECAY. As the energy available inside those two specks of radiation responsible for "my standing nuclear waves" becomes weaker and weaker, it is THE UNIVERSE who supply in the form of neutrinos and perhaps even smaller quanta [not yet discovered by our instruments] the right ENERGY that avoids such catastrophe. As a manner of recapitulation I remind you that "sub-atomic particles" inside the atom [in my theory] were not "particles" but HARMONICS FORMED IN THE CORE OF THE ATOM. That's why I always included the hydrogen atom since it is made out of "one quark harmonic-one proton harmonic-one single electronic harmonic" which in fact WERE nothing more than the SPATIAL PROJECTION of the same PATTERN... Got it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
My next thread will talk about a very interesting subject and one of Einstein prediction: the Bose-Einstein-Condensate [BEC]. I decided to post everything concerning such important piece of MATTER (considered the fifth state of matter] in an entirely new thread format. I promise you it will be FUN! I will begin with a short introduction of what that is [which many of you probably know already] followed very close by MY OWN INTERPRETATION about some interesting theoretical arguments also published in an attempt to explain RIGHT ANSWERS BY ASKING WRONG QUESTIONS... Don't miss it either!
Understanding BEC is nontheless an incredible feature of MATTER and just another opportunity to prove my theory to those interested in it.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

~~subversion~~

The way I see it, there are a few roads to revealing to one's self the TOE. Any of these roads has to do with uncovering one fundamental truth. As I have mentioned, one of these truths to be uncovered is the cause of the formation of the universe. By this method principally I've arrived independently at the TOE (which I promise to share with the hopeful) but another method I also indulged. This method is of uncovering the fundamental truth of matter, i.e. it's makeup. The fullfillment of this truth is the goal of the search for the Higg's boson. Now I will agree with you humanbydefault, that searching for the "God particle" is a joke, because the universe always keeps it's secrets. Now this does not mean that I don't believe in what the concept of the Higg's Boson is trying to address, that there is a fundamental unit of matter. I just believe it's inherent nature is such as to never be detected. Eventually, our minds must be able to fill in the blanks for where reality leaves us hanging.

An important point must then be drawn, one which has been driven home to me in the process of discovering. The similarity between fundamental truths is that they can never be determined by observation, and this reminds me of the incompleteness theorem. Just as the fundamental unit of matter remains hidden from us, so too can we never go/look back in time before the big bang, and this is not a matter of coincidence. In such a manner the universe only allows the most elect the priviledge of absolute understanding, for only those creatures so intelligent may be able to arrive at the answer to the riddle, when it is not easily given to them.

So what does this mean? It means that experimenters are never a replacement for theorists. It means that atom smashers and particle accelerators are a dead end of research. It means that the human mind can go where nothing, no device has gone before. And that is the wonder of the human mind, the ability to answer the riddle.

please be patient, our time awaits

-subversion, who, if his theory is correct, is the elected one (see the Book of Enoch)

humanbydefault · 10-20-2005, 10:20 AM

Good Call My Friend Sub!

humanbydefault · 11-28-2005, 11:42 AM