Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | In Training
Status: Offline Posts: 2
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005 Rep Power: 0 | illusions -
01-28-2005, 12:41 AM
Illusions are something that we have elegantly created in order for us to be able to experience What We Are Not. And with that new knowledge you now remember, know that in your most Purest, Ultimate Form you can be nothing else other than That...your most Purest, Ultimate Form. Everything else you have created in a subconscious, spiritual state in order for you to be able to experience Who You Are, i.e...LOVE. Love is the only concept of Truth you will Know! Without our illusions of not having or getting love, then we could never experience what we desire most...Our True Selves!
Last edited by michellemfry : 01-14-2006 at 08:45 PM.
| |
|  | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 |  What is real is it all just a real illusion! -
10-17-2005, 10:59 PM
Many Ideas that I have had concerning, what I thought was real, have turned out over time to be false, much like the lake in the desert you rush toward the water and fall down into a face-full of sand. What was very real when I was a boy are very different now I am all grown up (some would argue that) thoughts on life and death all have been set aside for another Idea. What's that saying so little time so much to do! Well in that idea, what is different now is that I realize that I am living in the eternal now, I do not have to die in order to be part of the eternal now! I, we are all within its embrace and that Idea has remained constant now for about the last 30 years, many others have come and gone but this one stays. So that tells me that maybe, just maybe that this is real and not an illusion, it further tells me that life by its very nature is eternal and that so are we, from life comes only life, the real big-big-illusion is that death is the end. This illusion needs to and will be smashed, it will be smashed by the venerable professors of higher learning and taught at the halls of academia around this here globe, within the next 25 years, the evidence of the human soul will also be presented as part of psychology lessons taught. Then we can all step out of the unreal into life.
Kind regards, Michael.
Last edited by zeroca : 02-05-2006 at 01:54 PM.
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
10-18-2005, 02:08 AM
For all of you, who are what I call illusionists: Illusion is an illusion.
And with this simple short true correct sentence I leave you, in your doubts, on whether it proves all you wrong, or if it's an enhancement to the illusion set of things.
Last edited by zeroca : 02-05-2006 at 01:57 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-18-2005, 02:11 PM
Since an illusion is an erroneous mental representation it is correct to say that we all have the illusion of thinking that the entire universe is out there and not realizing that the entire universe is really in out mind and within each and everyone. Therefore the universe is quantized with separated existence. When all our minds become connected then and only then will the universe become a continuum.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
10-18-2005, 04:07 PM
But the fact that our mind makes us think that the universe is out, implies that the universe is out, because the mind itself is thought, so the thought of the universe is out is the mind, and thus, the universe out. But no, because it is the fact that the thought is part of the mind, which implies that the universe is out, thus, the universe is out because it's in. But again we come to this same place. Thus, determining whether the universe is out or in is an infinite circular paradox. Any solutions?
Last edited by zeroca : 02-05-2006 at 02:01 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-18-2005, 04:53 PM
If time does not exist then the universe does not exist. Time only exists in our mind therefore the universe only exists in our mind. The universe is then the totality of all minds connected together.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Last edited by zeroca : 02-05-2006 at 02:02 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | The racing-mind needs a steady-Head! -
10-18-2005, 06:09 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao If time does not exist then the universe does not exist. Time only exists in our mind therefore the universe only exists in our mind. The universe is then the totality of all minds connected together. | Antonio; If we lived closer together I would give you a Hug! Your last two posts have given me hope that all is not lost! All is mind and mind is all=such is the sequence. Once again, many thanks for your input, I am grateful to you. Kind regards, Michael.
Last edited by zeroca : 02-05-2006 at 02:04 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-19-2005, 12:19 PM
Do our states of disillusionments encourage us to continue the search for a quantum mechanical nonlinear time operator? Is this search a lost cause? What do you think?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-19-2005, 12:50 PM
The following listed website describes some lost causes of theoretical physics: http://www.mth.kcl.ac.uk/~streater/lostcauses.html
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Banned
Status: Offline Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005 Rep Power: 0 |
10-19-2005, 05:07 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by <<>> But the fact that our mind makes us think that the universe is out, implies that the universe is out, because the mind itself is thought, so the thought of the universe is out is the mind, and thus, the universe out. But no, because it is the fact that the thought is part of the mind, which implies that the universe is out, thus, the universe is out because it's in. But again we come to this same place. Thus, determining whether the universe is out or in is an infinite circular paradox. Any solutions? | I guess it's all just a matter of how you look at it.
Antonio, what is a nonlinear time operator?
Last edited by zeroca : 02-05-2006 at 02:11 PM.
| |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | |
