Is it possible to prove the non-existence of God?

[ggullet]

This thread is certainly "dead" in that spiritualists cannot answer most post content, but that is to be expected of the "neglect" induced by attending to the more real invisible…

Anyway,

And the #1 purpose of humankind,
made up by silly humans is:
to adore a Perfect God who wouldn’t even need adoration!


PRAISE THE LORD
FOR BEING THE
GUY
IN THE RIGHT SPOT
AT THE RIGHT TIME!


(Ho hum. He was naturally talented. All was so easy for him.)

To remove God, or anything for that matter, from this model would change the model to something else. exsitence is only definable through it's relation to non-existence

[austintorn@aol.com]

Hi Prof,

Yes, God had it easy as pie, but we humans have to work for our living, etc., so, we get an "A" for effort and learning. God was born with a silver spoon and had it made in the shade…

Sometimes the silly making up of things has unseen repercussions of nonsense coming out of it.

It's like Isaac Asimov said, something like "Don't praise me; I had a natural talent for science and science fiction and for the writing of it."

[austintorn@aol.com]

To remove God, or anything for that matter, from this model would change the model to something else.

Hey, new old buddy, "God" is only in the model as made up by human mammals.

[ggullet]

There is omnipotence.

Good old ggullet, you are a man of few words.

Now, don't get mad, for I am actually being part humorous and of course I have no choice:

There is omnipotence.

God Gullet speaks,

for He knows All,

even as much as God knows…

Hail to gg!

He speaks for God Almighty.

As do we all

[ggullet]

To remove God, or anything for that matter, from this model would change the model to something else.

Hey, new old buddy, "God" is only in the model as made up by human mammals.

but there it be nonetheless

[austintorn@aol.com]

As do we all

Well, not all, but many cannot resist; unfortunately their individual "scoops" didn't match at all and so there was much killing and bloodshed over the pronouncements…

[austintorn@aol.com]

but there it be nonetheless

Yes, as humans made it up and put it there in their vanity…

[ggullet]

but there it be nonetheless

Yes, as humans made it up and put it there in their vanity…

resistance indicates choice, of which there is none.

If there is one thing that we may be able to agree on, it's that nothing has been "created" since creation. therefore humans can only interpret that which already is.

[Profpat]

resistance indicates choice, of which there is none.

If there is one thing that we may be able to agree on, it's that nothing has been "created" since creation. therefore humans can only interpret that which already is.

So you assuming omnipotence:

The argument can be stated as follows:
1) If a being exists, then it must have some active tendency 2) If beings have some active tendency, then they have some power to resist God 3) If beings have the power to resist God, then God does not have absolute power

[ggullet]

So you assuming omnipotence:

The argument can be stated as follows:
1) If a being exists, then it must have some active tendency 2) If beings have some active tendency, then they have some power to resist God 3) If beings have the power to resist God, then God does not have absolute power

a mouse in a straight tube fitted with one way check doors spaced exactly the length of the mouse essentially allowing travel in one direction. the mouse has active tendencies but no choice of direction