Intelligent or unintelligent?

[Lloyd Gillespie]

The 2/3 and 1/3 was division, where 2 divided by three equals 0.666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 6^r, meaning repeating to infinity, and 1 divided by 3 equals 0.333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 3333333333^r, meaning repeating to infinity__this being the reason no symmetry exists in numbers.... This is why I use absolute fundamentals to view the most basic motions and units of our Universe. Something mechanically has to make charge__What is it...?

This was my point of symmetry and asymmetry to you also Austin...

Not at all Lloyd. I agree, my thoughts have come to nearly the same resolve. Your 666 number is interesting, I have not read it. Link me . Years ago I found that Gods number is incomplete, as good is 3 and evil is 6 they are both not complete unless the number is 9. My thoughts fell upon 81, 9 squared as being the number that unites both dimensions and chemistry (27*3). But that would be 81 motion vectors max before a brake down in motion vrs other dimensional perspectives. I'm not so sure any more but its interesting that you came to an inverse number being 18.

I do think there are asymmetries due to a brake down in symmetries vrs symmetries. Like I said individuality is only part of the whole and so it misconstrues the whole. As it is not the whole so it can't be the whole. 2/3 is a brake down perspective of 1/3 and they both define 3/3 to a finite point. Yet looking out word 2/3 and 1/3 are infinite in perspective to any other. The real structure comes from it being 3rd's.

I think what it really is, is asymmetries arise from a symmetry being placed in perspective to any other symmetry, even the same (the half of half you were talking about Lloyd). Like you said 2/3 and 1/3 are the minimum perspectives to define all of reality.

This really isn't deviating from this original point. As I would relate it this might be along the lines of God creating reality and us defining it, which is funny because thats what we are really doing, trying to define reality in TOE.

[greenbug]

They define each other, alone they maybe infinite/abstract or even absolute. Yet they wouldn't be any thing if they weren't defined by them selves or the whole.

If by perspective .666^ was analyzed by .333^ then .333^ would see .666^ as finite.. That is 2/3 is finite to 1/3 but infinite to 3/3.. Along the lines as what I was saying the symmetry is off because of other symmetries. .333^ is half of .666^..

.333^ * 2 = .666^ .666^ / 2 = .333^ The wholeness is in the symmetry of all the numbers not a single number.

Like adding all the numbers from 1 to 100.. its easy to add 1+99, 2+98, 3+ 97.. and so on left over 50 and 100 =5050.. The symmetry is dependent on the numbers with in a system.

Asymmetry is in individuality, as I was saying.

[labelwench]

Asymmetry is in individuality, as I was saying.
Originally posted by Greenbug

Asymmetry in individuals is also expressed as 'handedness', with very few persons being ambidextrous, and even then, showing a marked preference for one side in the utilization of fine motor skills, and likewise in animals, with more horses being inclined to favor travel to the left, at least in the northern hemisphere.

A cute codicil to the post on 3's.

In retail, some price combinations are exceedingly uncommon. Last night, one of our frozen food lines came down priced at $3.33 per unit. I'm trying to recall when in 5 years of pricing, if I have ever seen that price come down on any item in the store. It was just too unusual of a coincidence not to mention.

Regards,

LW

[austintorn@aol.com]

That is a good deal for buyers, for they got money off of what was supposed to cost 3.33333333…