[allisall]

As Einstein has pointed out in the theory of relativity...IT IS ALL RELATIVE; EVERYTHING! One must follow the other in a continuum in order to be relative. How can true science embrace the former without the latter. It is contradictory at best.

[Guille]

Hi, allisall, I have a question about your username:

If all is all, and all is the sum of all things, then the all that is all is also thw sum of all things, and, by that, it must be the sum of all things, in which all enters as a thing, thus, all is the sum of all things including all itself. This can be followed eternally. It is abstract and too continuous. Do you have a solution for this?

[allisall]

Guille,

To seek a solution is to suggest there is a problem. I believe the whole of it ALL is so... apparent we "cannot see the forest for the trees". We have trapped ourselves in a search for (so called) hidden mysteries which are not mysteries at all.

All knowledge is before us daily, we have to open our eyes in order to see... ;
which in a manner of speaking means to lay aside all previously accepted knowledge and concepts to make ourselves available for the object of our pursuit.

[allisall]

Guille,

To respond to your curiosity about my user name, I KNOW that 'All is All', and 'The Sum of All Things' ; as Donny Hathaway used to say in that old
R&B song "Everything is Everything" S m i l e !

Sooner or later life becomes a journey of truth. It really is all relative. Thoughts are things, and we speak things into existence by the simple act of words going out and our very own cultivated atmosphere of expectancy.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by allisall Guille, To seek a solution is to suggest there is a problem. I believe the whole of it ALL is so... apparent we "cannot see the forest for the trees". We have trapped ourselves in a search for (so called) hidden mysteries which are not mysteries at all. All knowledge is before us daily, we have to open our eyes in order to see... ; which in a manner of speaking means to lay aside all previously accepted knowledge and concepts to make ourselves available for the object of our pursuit.

In contrast with the "we cannot see the forest for the trees" there is a famous saying in spain: we cannot see the bullfighting out of the bullfighting place (the spanish word for this has no translation).

So, we cannot analize a situation either from in or from out. But mkirpatrik, another member, posted a fe days ago that too much analisis leads to paralisis.

[PassatAmnesiac]

Hey AllisAll not to pick at you but from my understanding the speed of light is not relative. And from my understanding the expansion of the universe is not as well, except maybe in the Brane World Thoery.