Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dleviwing David44;
Though you stated on your site that we should ignore Relativity and Quantum Physics, I think a better understanding of these gauge theories would help you. You will find that in the thread "Dimensions and Entity" that these theories are designed to allow scientific measurements. The problem is that they are purely mathematical concepts that when interpreted to a philosophical paradigm of reality, the interpretation takes on the abstract nature of the mathematics. Many authors have played on this abstract nature to infer the existence of realities coexisting dimensions and the many world interpretation of QM.
Dimensions are measured quantities and worlds represent measured quantities of an interdependent system. The atom is a world system whereas the measure of mass or energy are dimensions. What we need to ignore are those who attempt to impress us with overwhelming intellect of meaningless nonsense. We actually need a better philosophical paradigm of reality that will allow us to properly interpret the numbers obtained from measurement and the terminology of science.
You have made a very important realization of the wave function or vibration as it relates to expansion and also the ethereal nature of space. Though it is possible to express reality in terms that infer energy as the entity of the universe, it is often misleading and ambiguous. Energy is actually a dimension or measured term that is the interactions between fundamental substance within the universe. What is referred to as Electromagnetic waves are the variants of spatial density of the ether.
You seem to have also realized that it is the angular momenta that organizes fundamental matter into a fundamental unit of structure.
You will find that even electrical charge is a process of the expansion or collapse of a physical entity of the universe in the randomized wave function motion state.
If you find better ways to relate your ideas to the gauge theories, it may help with how you present them. You do have the right idea to ignore the bizarre nonsense of Relativity and QM and focus on practical reality. BTW, string theory is just more foolish nonsense without any true supporting physics; only supporting math of unproven hypotheses.
Best regards;
Another Dave
|
Hi Dave,
Firstly, I did not say to ignore quantum physics and relativity. I simply said that if we have a look at our Universe without these and others we can see a full picture. I guess it all depends on a persons interpretation of what they read. I also said that it would be wise to put what you think you know under your seat for the time being while you are learning it, because if you don't it will stop you from seeing past the limitations of what is holding you back.
Finding a way to get a person to see past their beliefs is the biggest struggle I know of. If you have a secret potion let me know.
From your quote..."Dimensions are measured quantities and worlds represent measured quantities of an interdependent system. The atom is a world system whereas the measure of mass or energy are dimensions. What we need to ignore are those who attempt to impress us with overwhelming intellect of meaningless nonsense. We actually need a better philosophical paradigm of reality that will allow us to properly interpret the numbers obtained from measurement and the terminology of science"
Yes I do agree with this totally. However, if we put every type of science on a graph to see it's performance in relation to what we actually know and experience in life, (reality) we will see that every type of science makes some type of measurement on the graph and showing a certain percentage of reality.
In terms of traditional sciences such as Relativity, Quantum Physics, String Theory, Religion and E=MC2, they all fall way below the 5% mark. However, in terms of getting people to believe them, they reach above the 90% mark.
Based on what I have learned over the years, I have made predictions about certain things and they have been proven to the extent that they explain the outcome with regularity. You can see some of these things on my WebSite. And based on every prediction I have made to the point of findings, The Second Theory of Everything rates well over 50% on the graph, which is way higher than anything else we have.
I read somewhere that the knowledge of mankind does not grow by convincing people they are wrong, but by the ongoing method of new generations leaving what they find to be wrong behind, and bringing in the new.
As long as a person wants to hang onto the limitations of the past, they will never be able to move forward. It was only after I understood this did I leave everything else behind to find something new.
From your Quote..."Though it is possible to express reality in terms that infer energy as the entity of the universe, it is often misleading and ambiguous. Energy is actually a dimension or measured term that is the interactions between fundamental substance within the universe. What is referred to as Electromagnetic waves are the variants of spatial density of the ether."
This is exactly what I was talking about. What you are saying here came from a book. It has nothing to do with reality. And yet you believe it has. And so do most scientists on the planet.
If you really believe this theory of yours,(from the book) please explain how a solar panel can create electricity from "variants of spatial density of the ether." without any type of conversion or creation.
And if you cannot, I would suggest you might be very careful about sassing someone who can explain both areas with a single theory. Because it would be quite easy for someone to come up with a quote like this (your quote) and throw it right back at you...
What we need to ignore are those who attempt to impress us with overwhelming intellect of meaningless nonsense. We actually need a better philosophical paradigm of reality that will allow us to properly interpret the numbers obtained from measurement and the terminology of science.
From your Quote..."You will find that even electrical charge is a process of the expansion or collapse of a physical entity of the universe in the randomized wave function motion state"
This is a theory of assumption. Until you can actually tell me what the underlying nature of electrical charge is, then what it actually does in nature will always remain obscure. Because there
is no randomized wave function motion state"
Many people forget that Mathematics is just a tool for us to use. It is not the overall answer to everything that we must bring everything to it or fail. There is a lot more understanding to life than it can bring.
There are many magicians and Illusionists that use Mathematics to present their audience with wonder and amazement, and yet the illusions they come up with actually make sense, when viewed from a certain point of view. A popular saying among many Illusionists and other performers I have met is that they can do almost anything with maths.
http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com
cheers David
Know the empirical 
Linear Mode
