[david44]

Originally Posted by dwing29

david44,


I just took a look at your website but that is all, just a look. Will go back and continue but I had to respond to something right off the bat.
If you truly do have the solution to TOE then it should be simple, simplistic.
If most will fail to understand then I would argue that there must be something wrong. A true answer, the concept will not be hard to understand to anyone. There must be a simple paridigm of the basic mechanism of it all that everyone can understand.
However there is much wisdom in your posts.
Did you join this forum to debate your ideas or just point everyone to your website when they ask you a question? Most of us have websites, do you want to see mine?
I wise man, no matter how sure he is of himself and his conclusions, knows he could possibly be wrong. And myself personally have learned more by being wrong than I ever did being right. If you wish a challenge to your theories, you have come to the right place. Your fingers work pretty well, what about your ear? (please don't take this last sentence as an insult, not attended to be one. Just making a point from what I have observed so far in the posts)

Best wishes,
David

PS From what I have read so far since I have been a member of this forum, the one I believe is most up to challenging you theories would be dleviwing.

Hi David,

I have an entire page written on why most people will fail to learn. And the main reason is not because it is hard to learn, it is because it requires effort of attendance.

If you truly do have the solution to TOE then it should be simple, simplistic. If most will fail to understand then I would argue that there must be something wrong. A true answer, the concept will not be hard to understand to anyone. There must be a simple paridigm of the basic mechanism of it all that everyone can understand.

The basic principles on which The Second Theory of Everything is operating on can be split into two basic themes. One Mechanism and One Equation. It doesn't get any simpler than that. And this One Mechanism and One Equation can be associated with many things in our life today.

Did you join this forum to debate your ideas or just point everyone to your website when they ask you a question? Most of us have websites, do you want to see mine?

Yes I came to this website to hear about other peoples ideas and to share mine. However, when someone asks me a question, I don't feel I have the right to bring pages of my website to this forum. That would not only be unethical, it would probably annoy quite a lot of people.

So I do my best to answer the question in the most economical and shortest method possible here and then if I feel they would benefit from anything extra for that specific conversation then I recommend a chapter or two or even more on my website for extra information.

I do not sell anything on my website and all knowledge is free. So all I am really doing by directing people to my website is leading them to more of my knowledge, more of my ideas and certainly giving everyone all the evidence they need to attack my work with confidence if they see any holes in it.

And yes I have gone to a few websites from this forum, including the one dleviwing put in one of his quotes for me.

What is your website called? How do I get to it?

I wise man, no matter how sure he is of himself and his conclusions, knows he could possibly be wrong. And myself personally have learned more by being wrong than I ever did being right. If you wish a challenge to your theories, you have come to the right place. Your fingers work pretty well, what about your ear?

Yes David, I do agree with you on this point. I don't think anyone has learned more by being right than they are wrong. And in one my seminars I used to tell people that we were given a big message when we were born. One mouth, two ears and yet most people use their one mouth more than their two ears. It usually got a laugh.

And I'm glad I've come to the right place for a challenge, because if I'm wrong I want to know about it as soon as possible. And as long as I put a link to my website on every answer I give, then any new member would be able to find out what we are talking about quickly and get into the conversation.

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com

cheers
David

[dwing29]

Must have been tired last night. Skipped right by it.

There is some merit in your thinking but I believe it is simpler than that.
Your Dilt is another name for a base particle or a first particle that makes up the others in the form of EMF waves if I understand you.
But you also make assumptions when you say they just spark or achieve magnetism. If I read on with your theory will it explain how and why to me?

[dwing29]

david44,


Actually this is interesting. The more I read of your website the more I realize that your theory is not really that far off. There is another theory I am aware of and support and yours is similiar but your perseption of the basic mechanism, that is different. Or maybe I just haven't reached the part where you break it down a little further as to what the interaction is that causes the spark or magnetism in this basic particle of yours.

David A

[dwing29]

One mechanism, One equation. I agree 100%.
But the mechanism is simpler than what you have describe so far or what I have read so far.

[david44]

Originally Posted by dwing29

david44,


Actually this is interesting. The more I read of your website the more I realize that your theory is not really that far off. There is another theory I am aware of and support and yours is similiar but your perseption of the basic mechanism, that is different. Or maybe I just haven't reached the part where you break it down a little further as to what the interaction is that causes the spark or magnetism in this basic particle of yours.

David A

What is this other theory you are aware of? And where can I see it?

[david44]

Originally Posted by dwing29

One mechanism, One equation. I agree 100%.
But the mechanism is simpler than what you have describe so far or what I have read so far.

I'm very interested, tell me more.

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com

cheers David

[dwing29]

david44,


You are very correct in following the idea of attraction and expansion.
Focus on the basic mechanism, perceptional mechanism that achieves this.
When we measure this effect we call it force but we are only measuring a magnitude of motion, towards and away.
I saw something on your website in regard to Ether but could not find page where you elaborate. Sorry, my time was limited last night and this morning so only had a chance to skim. The key is what happens in the interactions between structured mass and the ether. Your idea has merit but so far what I have read, I don't think you have quite gone far enough. Need to read you ether concept to tell if you have gone further.
The theory belongs to dleviwing if you can get him to speak with you. Or read his past posts. Read his sentences carefully. There is more meaning in them than what intially appears on the surface or when you first read them. Reflect on them and you will see how they relate to your views.

[david44]

I saw something on your website in regard to Ether but could not find page where you elaborate. Sorry, my time was limited last night and this morning so only had a chance to skim. The key is what happens in the interactions between structured mass and the ether. Your idea has merit but so far what I have read, I don't think you have quite gone far enough. Need to read you ether concept to tell if you have gone further.

Actually I've gone all the way, I have joined both the ether and mass within one mechanism using one equation.

There is an old saying.....those who start reading a book from the back cover will never know why the butler did it.

I have shortened The Second Theory of Everything to the shortest amount possible. You will need to read from the start and gradually work your way through it a piece at a time. Only then will you find what you are looking for. There are no more short cuts.

Every section of The Second Theory of Everything is joined at the hip of the one before it. And you will need the knowledge of each section to properly understand the next section. If you jump ahead, you will not have enough of the base knowledge needed to understand.

When I was a child, a teacher told me the following quote: If any of us ask a question in life, we must be prepared to put the effort in to get the answers, if we do not put in the effort, we do not get the answers. And if we aren’t prepared to do the research, we shouldn’t winge that we don’t understand how things work.

With this in mind I have been able to achieve some amazing results, and I have put some of those results on my website. Have an open mind and get to understand it all. I’m sure that once you do, you will be amazed as well.

The theory belongs to dleviwing if you can get him to speak with you.

I must ask the question, why doesn't he want to speak to me? What have I done that is so bad?

Because all I did was to ask him to connect one of his thoughts with reality with proof (the solar panel) and then reflected one of his derogatory quotes that he threw at me, back at him in a kinder way than he intended it for me.

Perhaps he doesn't want to speak to me because that one little question to him, threw a spanner into the workings of his entire world, and perhaps now he lacks the confidence to share his views, because he knows that he has not quite got it right. Which then leads me to believe that if he doesn't have the confidence in his own work anymore, then why should anyone else?

But I will not be intimidated by silly little childish mind games. If dleviwing does not have enough Integrity to talk to me then that is his problem, not mine.

However, upon saying all that I have already looked through his personal postings, mainly looking for a link to his work, but have not found one. I will now go back and look for his knowledge in his writings in his postings. I hope I am not wasting my time.

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com

cheers David

[dleviwing]

David44;
You already know you have the answers for a TOE; What would you have me discuss with you. I read you site completely and only found partial answers. Did you leave out vital information?

Your interpretations and descriptions of interactions show little understanding of the science disciplines of measure and their terminology.
How does your sparks between Dilts cause the phenomena you claim? Your theory is where others have been over thirty years ago; it did not work for them then; it will not work for you now.

Does it bother you that someone may be well beyond your ideas?
The problem is within you; learn and comprehend current theories before you lay claim to the prize. Relate your ideas to true scientific methodology and more will pay heed to what you say.

You have made the assumption that I am incapable of understanding your concepts. I have read and understood many such concepts in the past and frankly find them quaint and amusing. Each has reached a level of understanding and tend to stop their research thinking they have achieved the final answer. Like those before you; you have not reached the final chapter, thus I suggest you keep critiquing your theory until you get it right.

I know that any other scientist you present this concept to will do just as I did, acknowledge your ignorance and brush you off.

[david44]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

David44;
You already know you have the answers for a TOE; What would you have me discuss with you. I read you site completely and only found partial answers. Did you leave out vital information?

Your interpretations and descriptions of interactions show little understanding of the science disciplines of measure and their terminology.
How does your sparks between Dilts cause the phenomena you claim? Your theory is where others have been over thirty years ago; it did not work for them then; it will not work for you now.

Does it bother you that someone may be well beyond your ideas?
The problem is within you; learn and comprehend current theories before you lay claim to the prize. Relate your ideas to true scientific methodology and more will pay heed to what you say.

You have made the assumption that I am incapable of understanding your concepts. I have read and understood many such concepts in the past and frankly find them quaint and amusing. Each has reached a level of understanding and tend to stop their research thinking they have achieved the final answer. Like those before you; you have not reached the final chapter, thus I suggest you keep critiquing your theory until you get it right.

I know that any other scientist you present this concept to will do just as I did, acknowledge your ignorance and brush you off.

Hi Dave,

It's nice to hear from you again.

I want you to know that I initially did want to respect you and as a result I have read some of your posts and unfortunately there is a common theme through all of them.

You don't actually say anything with any of the thoughts that come out of your head. All you seem to do is give a lot of rhetoric nonsense that sounds like you have it all together, but there is actually no content in what you have said.

One other major thing I noticed was your ability to insult people when they say something you don't understand or agree with. I find this process of intimidation of yours is probably the reason you've been able to convince so many people that you have it all together.

But that crap won't work on me, because I can answer any question you can come up with, and do it with just the basic knowledge from within The Second Theory of Everything

And also the truth remains in plain view for everyone to see.

Where are your thoughts? Where is your complete theory?

You clearly do not have a complete theory and all your knowledge is based on what other people have said to you and what you have read in books. It is clear to me that you can't answer any of my questions because your alleged knowledge is not your own. You don't even have a base knowledge of what you are trying to peddle to other people in this forum. That is why you retreated to your own little world when I asked you to prove one little thing.

And now I'm going to ask you one more very important question.....If you don't have the TOE in your own head from you own work, what makes you think you have the right to put others down for knowing something that you don't or even agree with?

By doing so means you are just another idiot who thinks he knows everything and clearly doesn't.

When are you going to actually say something that adds to the knowledge of this website? And when are you going to stop insulting people because of your inability to express what you think you know?

Also, what you do with your insults doesn't bother me as much as it does others, because I have had a lot more horrible people attack me than what you are. And I can answer each and every one of them. I've even had religious people try to stop me from having my website because I can prove that religion does not want to have peace on this planet.

But what about all of the information that could have been put on this website that will never see the light of day because of the bully that you are. How many people have just left this website because they couldn't express their thoughts because of a fear of not being accepted by their peers? Or because they just didn't want to get insulted by the type of person that you are?

You are a very nasty individual. I could have known what I know today 20 years ago, if it wasn't for people like you. But like so many others, I was convinced not to try my experiments because of fears. Because I listened to people like you who made out you knew stuff.

Mankind as a whole is being held back from learning anything new by you and all those like you. Either put up or shut up. Because I've had enough.

Where is this so called scientific knowledge you keep telling everyone you have? Come on, the balls in your court now. Either put up or shut up.

And make sure that anything that comes out of your mouth from now on has substance, because I will be right behind you to show everyone how much of an illusionist you are.

10 million children die every year because of people who want to hang onto their religious beliefs at all cost. Is this you? Or are you willing to put what you think you know in harms way? Either put up or shut up.

I am Watching


And yes I have left out a lot of information, because mankind is not yet ready, because there are still too many people like you in it.

As long as people like you remain on this planet, there will never be peace.

The gloves are now off Dave. Either put up or shut up!

And coming back with one sentence quips will definitely prove my point to everyone about the type of person you are and how much knowledge you don't have.

And I will make it easy for you, I will give you a simple little tip.....Make sure that what ever alleged scientific knowledge you think you have, and you want to hit me with can be directly related to life itself and not just a theory. Because I will shoot you down in flames if you try any more rhetoric nonsense with me.

This is not a game, there are a lot of people who come to this and other websites to learn what they cannot find previously in their life.

If you disagree with what someone has to say, make your case in point by using your own words about what you think you know and not attacking the person or the knowledge in any way. Taking cheap shots at people is not the way to do it. Do not put some else's knowledge down in any way shape or form. This is not the way to get respect.

Either learn this or be gone!!!!!

Have a nice day

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com

cheers David