The Second Theory of Everything

[david44]

Hello everyone,

My name is David and I am the author of The Second Theory of Everything. This is a full and complete understanding of Life from the sub-atomic world to the cosmos. So far there hasn't been anyone who has been able to challenge the accuracy of it in any way.
The credibility of my theory is untouchable. It explains everything in detail and without the use of the basic fundamental and traditional laws of physics.

The Second Theory of Everything is just a small part of

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com

I would be grateful if you could test my knowledge and try to prove me wrong. Because I have thrown out almost everything scientists hold sacred.

I was told there were some pretty intelligent people on this website and I should give you the chance to prove me wrong.

Good Luck, I wish you well and look forward to hearing from you soon.

David44

[mkirkpatrick]

David 44,I have scanned through some of your stuff,it seems that you have put much effort,and much of yourself into this work.May be I missed it but didyou mention mind-consciousness,I know you talked about "going home"for me all is
mind,and all manifestation isthe product of mind,what do you think of mindfulness.and ideation,matter and mind one of the same??



kind regards michael.

[david44]

Hi Michael,

In answer to your question, there is an entire section devoted to this specific topic. And "Going Home" is also a part of being here, as well as the return journey. I have explained this in detail in both easy to understand terms as well as producing scientific schematics of how this happens.

Everything in life is connected from the very small to the very large and also beyond.

Do yourself a favour and get to read all of The Second Theory of Everything and I'm sure just about all of your questions will be answered.

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com

cheers David

[dleviwing]

david44;
Welcome to TOEquest.
Do you have a background in any field of science or is this concept simply that of a self taught layman?

[david44]

Thanks for the welcome,

It is a bit hard to answer that question as it was so long ago, still, I will give it a shot.

I started out with mechanical engineering and got stuck on a man by the name of Nikola Tesla. This man is the most remarkable man I have ever read about and from there it was just a natural progression or quest to want to know about life itself. Because to look at this from one point of view, Nikola Tesla has achieved more knowledge relating to the substance of life through successful experimentation than any other person in our history.

I have studied just about every field there is to physics. up to the level at which I realised it no longer fell into the parameters of the work of Nikola Tesla.

As soon as any of the acceptable knowledge on physics contradicted the actual findings of Nikola Tesla, I realised it did not have all the answers and I then moved on to the next subject, looking for more answers that connected with his findings
.
Nikola Tesla created knowledge from successful experiments even though most of what he thought to be true was not accepted by the scientific community at the time.

I have studied the work and knowledge of many different scientists in every field that has something to do with "Life Itself" and what people believe or hold to be true on this planet, as well as the findings that are thought to be from others. lol

So, on the most part I think one could say I was self taught, however, I could never take credit for the findings of all of the knowledge in The Second Theory of Everything. Because most of it has come from the efforts of many others. And I think that that is the reason it is so successful in the face of attack, because I have only used evidence that has been proven, and at the same time the evidence is conclusive on a number of fronts.

A perfect example of this is the electromagnetic energy expansion rate of 2:25 - 1. This applies to every area of life we know about from the very small to the very large. It alone is indisputable and yet it alone disproves many notions about Quantum Physics and Relativity, including black holes.

http://theuniversalcodeofliving.com


cheers David

[Guille]

Hi dave.
You'll find a lot to discuss about in the forums, their open to all kind of toequesters: philosophy, mathematis, physics, religion... I recomend you to start a thread in the forum called "Your TOE theory". I'm currently reading through your web page, there's a lot to!

You can, apart from the toe itself, expose thoughts on each part of the forums, and as I see your toe is onyl a part of your big picture, then you can psot the other parts in it's correspodning forums.

I see that you've done a lot of research, so, definatelly your theory is not one more of the bunch: those kinds of theories that claim, and claim, and claim, and say, and say, but have nor proof, evidence, or background.

[david44]

Thankyou Guille

I will do my best to navigate this site.

cheers David

[Guille]

Thankyou Guille

I will do my best to navigate this site.

cheers David

One more thing: I just wanted to ask you why you call it "the second theory of everything"? I believe it's not to do with the second as in measurement of time. Also I believe that it's not the second part of a toe. So, is it because you consider the knowledge gained by science up to know a TOE, and that yours is a replacement?

[dleviwing]

Hi David44;
I always found Tesla's work quite interesting.
Can you explain what is meant by the "electromagnetic energy expansion rate of 2:25 – 1"? Is it a ratio or a rate of expansion?

The randomized wave function of matter promotes expansion and angular uniform motion promotes the collapse of matter by decreasing the wavelength function to form fundamental units of matter (a Dilt for you; a Toron for me). Though we seem to express ourselves differently, I think we may be referring to the same process.
Your web site is rather extensive so it will take some time to see how much we have in common with our ideas. Much of my concepts are here on TOEquest if you wish to review the threads.

Does the 44 refer to something like age or year of birth?
Have a gooday mate;
Dave (dleviwing)

[david44]

One more thing: I just wanted to ask you why you call it "the second theory of everything"? I believe it's not to do with the second as in measurement of time. Also I believe that it's not the second part of a toe. So, is it because you consider the knowledge gained by science up to know a TOE, and that yours is a replacement?

Hi Guille,

To me a TOE is supposed to take in everything in it's wake. The only TOE that I have seen that makes this claim is String Theory. As I did not want to be associated in any way to String Theory, I thought I would call it The Second Theory of Everything so that people can associate my theory with being a totally separate entity from everything else available.

David