Intro

[lteller]

Hi, My name is Lynn, I am writing a paper for Teology class on God as Creator. I would like to include some material on the theory of everything. I think maybe I have come to the right place.

[michellemfry]

How do you feel about God as a possible programmer, rather than creator? Any God would certainly have been an expert in any and all forms of languages, including computers, don't you agree? Welcome to the forums, have some fun while you do your homework.

[Guille]

Hi iteller. I recomend you don't miss my thread entitled God. In it I present several arguments against theology, and give logical deduction to the impossibility of the existance not only of an entity such as god, but of all of the properties atributed to it. Of course, there are many that ahve replied to me (sometimes agresivelly), and my thread has been given bad reputation and bad points. Still, I regularly add posts to it, as prove that the strength of the christian religion, not only wasn't enough a few centuries ago as to quiet Galileo (eppur si muove!), but is not enough now to quiet me down. Why? Simple: We carry the TRUTH. Here I give you a link to my thread: http://www.toequest.com/forum/intelligent-design/405-god.html

[lteller]

P.S. What is TRUTH?

[lteller]

In my mind God os capable of all things, so yes, programmer is one of his talents. This is fun, by the way.

[Guille]

Hi again.

Truth is that which is the reality of the existence of the essence of the entities.

The problem with the definition I have developed, is that it is so complex and it is so specific, that it is neither comprehensible, or true (only true it is for my philosophy). That is the problem: philosophy gets wrong when it becomes a theory, and it is wrong if it is not such.

[michellemfry]

Can love of truth and truth itself be one and the same thing?

[lteller]

For example?

Truth is that which is the reality of the existence of the essence of the entities.

The problem with the definition I have developed, is that it is so complex and it is so specific, that it is neither comprehensible, or true (only true it is for my philosophy). That is the problem: philosophy gets wrong when it becomes a theory, and it is wrong if it is not such.[/QUOTE]

[Guille]

Can love of truth and truth itself be one and the same thing?

Yes and no. It depends on your definition of truth. I mean, truth in itself, meaning objective truth, no, that is not the love of truth, it is a fact itself of the objects. But if turth for you is relative, that is, truth for me, then yes, love of truth can be truth itself, for me, for example.

[Guille]

For example?

Truth is that which is the reality of the existence of the essence of the entities.

The problem with the definition I have developed, is that it is so complex and it is so specific, that it is neither comprehensible, or true (only true it is for my philosophy). That is the problem: philosophy gets wrong when it becomes a theory, and it is wrong if it is not such.

[/QUOTE]

I think you got mixed up with the quoting. I can't follow. Do you want to give me an example of a truth? or of what?