yesterday i was relaxing when i was confused by the idea of big bang. if as i thought big bang is a huge blast of energy.the universe need not have a boundary. well, considering a bomb blast i don't think it goes off in a defined pattern does it? the particles burn out producing an amount of enegy why cant we consider universe in such a way. the particles just accelerate outwards it is not any kind of boundary that is doing the job. the particles are still expanding considering the galaxies are moving away from us accelerating. if we consider the paticles in the universe as isolated systems particles do not lose or gain energy. Their interactions is the way we have energy. the other verses (if they r present)will just combine in a certain ratio so that they will be balanced(i dont know what ratio it is).
But if the particles r accerating. then if we come a 1000000000 years afterwards then we must find ourselves seeing the light going faster than this. and as we say rigel is 540 light years away. if as i say light accelarates then rigel is not 540 light years away but much farther.
may be light is the fastest because photons were the first ones to be ejected from the big bang so they have a lead on the others.
i slightly know what i have written here. I am egoistic to see what all is wrong in here or the entire thing is wrong. I assume there are many mistakes.
Mohan
Hi everybody 
no crunch only lunch! 
Linear Mode
