Intro

[jungjedi]

I Was Never Here!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[dleviwing]

Welcome to ToeQuest anyway. Maybe you can be here some other time.

[pagan3142]

I saw a man who wasn't there
sitting on a chair,
I saw him again today,
I wish he would just go away.

[mkirkpatrick]

When you return,I will bid you welcome,Junjedi.
regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Jungjedi, we, none of us were here. Welcome anyway.

[Guille]

The most dense tecnically (in language) and existentially (in form) book ever written, "Sein und Zeit", Being and Time, by Heidegger, is very slow but has some good thoughts. The being-in-the-world configurates the structure of the dasien (translated to something like the being-there), and this means that if jungjedi has been-in-the-world (the world is these forums, and we know he has been for he has posted) then he is a dasien in this world (he is a being-there in the forum), that is, he was here, and he could not have never been here.

[Mohan.C]

The most dense tecnically (in language) and existentially (in form) book ever written, "Sein und Zeit", Being and Time, by Heidegger, is very slow but has some good thoughts. The being-in-the-world configurates the structure of the dasien (translated to something like the being-there), and this means that if jungjedi has been-in-the-world (the world is these forums, and we know he has been for he has posted) then he is a dasien in this world (he is a being-there in the forum), that is, he was here, and he could not have never been here.

This sure is some technically written post.

[harmonygirl]

Guille,
Denser than Hobbes Leviathan?

[Guille]

Guille,
Denser than Hobbes Leviathan?

Oh yes, much much more. The leviathan is light compare to it. I like differentiating between slow books which are dense and slow books which are boring. The first type includes (as maximum exponents) Heidegger's Being and Time and Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Whiles the second type includes (as maximum exponents) Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation and Kant's Critique of Reason (out of the three volumes, the third is the worst). The difference is that heidegger and wittgenstein are not boring, just dense, and schopenhauer and kant are not dense, just boring. I suppose the Leviathan is of the second type.

[pagan3142]

Well what a response to a simple Rhyme.
And all the replys he he.
As I write this am laughing at all the posts since with thier digs.
Do you not sometimes laugh at things ?
A little humour go's a long way to brighten up ones day.
The very clever replys have not gone un-noticed and I look forwards to more of the same.
Thanx for making me feel my contributions are welcome.
The time you took to quote from other sources etc was "Time well spent" Keep it up.