Probably not all. It's something I'm still struggling with. Of course, by math, I also mean logic, etc. Godel also happened to prove that ANY formal system (i.e. math) cannot fully encompass reality. Sort of.
I think that the infinities of zpe would come closest, and as Dirac might say, "renormalization is mathematically incorrect."
If "c" is not finite, but absolute, then E = mc, without squaring it, would represent the equivalence of "all" of the universal energy at any given point of the universe. In other words, the whole universe is contained within any one point, or rather the "zero point."
0/0, or G = mc, would indicate an infinite number of infinitesimal/absolute point masses with infinite/absolute energy.
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Thanks, are you being sarcastic when you say thanks for being here (or there)?
On the contrary, Sir.
Best regards,
- RP
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
Re: Hello World! -
01-09-2008, 02:47 PM
Linear Mode
