[everymansmedium]

Originally Posted by Profpat

I don't know John, I think the big bang is still the best theory floating around. I found this from a NASA site.

Tests of Big Bang Cosmology

The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important observations, each of which are described in more detail on separate pages:
The expansion of the universe Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally receding from us provided the first clue that the Big Bang theory might be right. The abundance of the light elements H, He, Li The Big Bang theory predicts that these light elements should have been fused from protons and neutrons in the first few minutes after the Big Bang. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation The early universe should have been very hot. The cosmic microwave background radiation is the remnant heat leftover from the Big Bang. These three measurable signatures strongly support the notion that the our universe evolved from a dense, nearly featureless hot gas, just as the Big Bang model predicts.

• Comments and Suggestions
• Privacy Policy and Important Notices
• Reproduction Guidelines

• <LI id=webaddress>wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov
• Webmaster: Britt Griswold
• NASA Official: Dr. Gary F. Hinshaw
• Page Updated: Wednesday, 03-05-2008

Additionally I think WMAP supports the big bang theory.

Best,

Pat

Hello Pat:
With apologies to CarlS for his intro getting used as a meeting place. I guess this just happens when somebody says something that you would like to respond to.
I never did give up on the BB. I have been involved in other thinking presently. I have not dismissed the possibility that these thoughts could end in that manner. They just have not progressed far enough to tell yet. I do know enough not to dismiss any variable that has not been properly disposed of. I am sure that some kind of cycling does happen. I just refuse to become fixated on this common thought when every body agrees that it is likely that we have an error somewhere in our thinking/toolbox that is making the solution to the TOE very obscured. I guess at this point I am unsure of nearly everything. A good part of this might also be due to experiences. Talking about experiences is like giving evidence that amounts to nothing but hear say relative to an absolute. Because of this we all have different tools boxes. We have yet to see what tool box holds the key to the TOE. I am just trying all of the tools at this point to see if I can find one that fits. I try to direct myself toward areas that leave you with not but questions. Like "superposition" , non location , entanglement. Then there is the observation of the progression of dimensions that I do not feel has been done at all because of being told we can not do this. Yet I see an obvious occurrence here that is simply dismissed for no good reason. Is not the strongest fact that we might ever have be "I AM" for even if everything else is a dream, this is still true. The very first thing that we notice about this is that it requires time. This then must be the place to begin, yet this is the area that is never touched. I think before we consider a bang we should make an attempt to understand what the true basics are.
I try to keep these ideas then see if it is possible to build a universe in my mind that will produce what I see. Then I tear it apart when it does not work.
If there were millions of people doing this same thing maybe one of them will find a universe that we can not tear apart. I guess I have worked too long with the idea of simulation to see things any other way. The idea of simulation has taught me many things, and it is likely to continue. I do not try to see what is, but rather what I could make that would produce the same as what I see. This is the reason that some of the solutions that I find are so very different. The approach is reversed. The older each idea becomes the less strange it becomes. My oldest is Unit Unity Community this is now 38 years old. It began in 1970. I am beginning to feel this one will never change
It is now being read in 16 countries. I still get nothing but SILENCE on this one. Not one person ever sent an email to ask a question or make a comment. It has been on the web since 1999. The original document is responsible for about 1700kb data per month. This is just a bit more than once per day it is downloaded. This amounts to a bit under 3000 copies. Now when you consider that I have never paid to advertise anything, yet every month is a bit better than the last.
John

[MJA]

Originally Posted by Profpat

I don't know John, I think the big bang is still the best theory floating around.

Pat

There is a bigger bang coming than the theoretical original bang that supposedly divided the universe so. It it the bang of truth not theory, the bang of TOE, the bang that will reunite a wrongfully divided universe, make it one or whole again, and set us free. The Big Bang is TOE, is EQUALITY, and it's coming to a universe near you.

BANG!!!!!!!!!
MJA

[Robert]

Originally Posted by carlscheider

So . . . I'm new to this. Help me understand this a bit. Where can I go in this pile of information to get a handle on the prevailing theories of everything? And why hasn't the world accepted this one yet?

Hello Carl,

Currently there is a forum for an Individual's Personal Toe Theory at Your TOE Theory and a forum for published theories at TOE Theories. I'm also working on several features to better introduce, track progress, and organize the Toe Theories that are available. If things go well, I'll be able to introduce one such feature later this week.

Also, welcome to ToeQuest! Just let me know if you have any difficulties with the website.

Regards,
--Robert

[Tina]

Originally Posted by carlscheider

It says here I should introduce myself first.


I have since met the author of that little gem, and he has published another, much more extensive work. Much to my utter amazement, that book has NOT been accepted as the answer to life's persistent questions - or the theory of everything.


So . . . I'm new to this. Help me understand this a bit. Where can I go in this pile of information to get a handle on the prevailing theories of everything? And why hasn't the world accepted this one yet?

Thanks. I'll go look around a bit.

CarlS

Welcome Carl!

I've read the links and Daniel Fitzpatrick Jnr is quite a generous sharer of his ideas. But as far as the theory goes it is persuasive but I think it needs to be thrashed out with some proponents of Plasma Cosmology or Electric Universe theories....some details need re-examining in light of Electromagnetism and magnetic fields.

[neutralino]

Originally Posted by Tina

Welcome Carl!

I've read the links and Daniel Fitzpatrick Jnr is quite a generous sharer of his ideas. But as far as the theory goes it is persuasive but I think it needs to be thrashed out with some proponents of Plasma Cosmology or Electric Universe theories....some details need re-examining in light of Electromagnetism and magnetic fields.

Hmm, I don't see any link between this guy's work and Plasma Cosmology/ Electri Universe theories-- perhaps I didn't read it properly.

Anyway, to say that these Plasma Cosmology or Electric Universe theories need "some details re-examining" is a huge understatement-- these theories are just wrong!

[Tina]

Originally Posted by neutralino

Plasma Cosmology or Electric Universe theories need "some details re-examining" is a huge understatement-- these theories are just wrong!

The connection with EU is based on the theory's explanation of electron transfer and wave action etc.

Oh neutralino I'm a advocate of Electric universe - I don't know why you think this theory are 'just wrong'. Anyway I didn't mean to infer that Plasma Cos + Electric Universe need re-examining - I was refering to aspects of Fitzpatricks theory.

[neutralino]

Originally Posted by Tina

The connection with EU is based on the theory's explanation of electron transfer and wave action etc.

Ok, fair enough.

Originally Posted by Tina

Oh neutralino I'm a advocate of Electric universe - I don't know why you think this theory are 'just wrong'. Anyway I didn't mean to infer that Plasma Cos + Electric Universe need re-examining - I was refering to aspects of Fitzpatricks theory.

Well, this isn't really the place to be discussing Electric Universe or Plasma Cosmology theories. I'll just leave it at that!