My "New Member Introduction"

[Hans J Zeunert]

Hi Robert,

Thank you for your friendly "welcome to the club". I think we all want the same. We want to know the truth, or at least we like to enhance our understanding towards that what surrounds us and how all things work together in order to satisfy our intellect. We are no fools. Before we look at a proposal, an idea, it must make sense. I think this view is what draws us together. Allow me to introduce myself and tell you where I come from, what has been my life, and why I like to join your group assembled at your forum in the quest of "a Theory of Everything", in order to propose and defend my theory of a "unified Mind".

I was born in Berlin, Germany, on June 21, 1929, the longest day of the year. To my mother, I was the "sunshine boy" in her life. As a young child, I saw the Russian Army move into Berlin, putting an end to a senseless war. I saw dead people in the streets, women being raped. Electronics were my choice and fascination at the time. I build a few radios as long as the market was there and industry had not picked up since the Russians had collected all the radios when they came - for security reasons - I am sure.

From there on, after things had stabilized, I had a pleasant high school time because there were nice kids, and I took my time to finish my studies in Electrical Engineering in Aachen when I was 30 years of age. (My father, a business man, had always been very supportive of me.) After working for Telefunken in Berlin for a couple of years playing with single side-band transmitters, I took the big step and immigrated to Canada with a job lined up already at the R&D Laboratories at Northern Electric in Ottawa, engaged in microwave design. Now I was in the position to have a family on my own and live in peace and trust away from the battle grounds of the past. This, to me, was the purpose in life. In quick order I had a wife and 3 kids, with Heidi, now my wife, nagging me to join the Baptist Church to become "organized" and "be normal", instead of nurturing Sunday morning hang-overs, wasting valuable family time.

Inviting Jesus into your life, in effect giving up and handing over control, this is pretty tough. What is if you don't like it? The question rises: Can you go back to where you were before and cancel the whole thing, or are you "caught forever" in somebody else's clutches, making all the wrong moves? They say to give up control and pass it on, you make a deal with Jesus, in person, straight, no middle-man, and You may ask whatever you want, no kidding, and it will be given to you. Wow! Can you imagine, like getting a free wish for letting the genie out off the bottle in a fairy tale setting? So, what is it that I want?

I had everything I wanted, or could possibly think of. I had invested my mother's money wisely to buy an apartment block which really took off, then I bought 2 miles of gorgeous waterfront property along Okanagan Lake in "Beautiful British Columbia". All plans were ready for a recreational development including a resort, stunning homes, a recreational vehicle park laid out in perfection, and finally, to top it all, a meditation retreat thought for spiritual enhancement and relaxation. (I had joined TM before. Transcendence was the attraction, and the discovery that there are different states in Consciousness.) Then all went bust, just to show me who is boss, and whom I had trusted with looking after my life, my family, and all my affairs. Still, I never suffered in physical terms. I always had a roof over my head.

What did I asked for? "Wisdom" of all things. I should have known better. Do I want to make a fool out of myself and start believing in spooky things, apart from one's own solid training in no-nonsense engineering? I had my reservations. I thought this was a trick, a make-belief, like selling instant sin-forgiveness certificates or stunts like that. Did I get it? What: "wisdom"? Well, in my own mind, I have no questions anymore. All I ever wanted to know has been answered through my own writings. All these things have been "revealed" to me. I asked for it, so I should not come now and bitch and complain. How does it work?

There are 2 voices in each of us: the "loud-mouthed ego" and the little one, one's "inner voice". At the beginning, this "inner voice" is very faint, and one has to become very quiet in order to hear it; but it appears to have contact with ones own "higher self", the one who should know better. Today, I have a loving wife and lead a happy and care-free life. Heidi and I have been studying and living the "Course in Miracles" which Heidi has come home with one day more than 30 years ago. All my wisdom derives from there, and all my questions have been answered how to put matter and life and memory together in one simple theory. So, what do you think? Am I preaching, or is there room to discuss Creation and Its physical and spiritual Aspects in a 5-dimensional environment?

Hans

[mkirkpatrick]

Welcome Hans.you are ın the rıght place at the right time.I send you greetings from Turkey.



regards michael.

[Tina]

There are 2 voices in each of us: the "loud-mouthed ego" and the little one, one's "inner voice". ....... So, what do you think? Am I preaching, or is there room to discuss Creation and Its physical and spiritual Aspects in a 5-dimensional environment?

Hans

Well Hans I think religious discussion often just ends in arguments but many on forum enjoy religious/physics discussions - so I say give it a try.

The two voices make alot of sense to me......and I think the "inner voice" has got to find a way to be heard...its like knowing the right thing to do but not being able to actually do it.

[dleviwing]

Hans;
Welcome to ToeQuest.

We have many forums here including religious and spiritual forums. The arguments that Tina mentioned only arise when members attempt to present religion in the science forums. Science does not recognize faith and testimonial evidences as proof; science philosophy requires observable empirical data. When any religion provides such data then it becomes science. We call the study of religions science, but that does not make religion a science. Most scientist also have a religious faith. I’ve never been able to find any “will-of-god” justification for the atrocities of neither humans nor nature.

[Hans J Zeunert]

Well Hans I think religious discussion often just ends in arguments but many on forum enjoy religious/physics discussions - so I say give it a try.

The two voices make alot of sense to me......and I think the "inner voice" has got to find a way to be heard...its like knowing the right thing to do but not being able to actually do it.

Hi Tina,

Thank you for your support. The inner voice does not suggest to do anything, it suggests not to do anything but to "allow the universe" to act for you on your behalf, by allowing things to happen without your ego interfering. Jesus called it the "Holy Spirit" he was going "to send from Heaven". Interesting? Works for me. Sorry for being a bit late with my reply, but right now I am enjoying an unplanned vacation in Waikiki, Oahu/Hawaii, tending to my sun burns. Cool? I look forward to a spirited discussion on the "Unified Mind Theory". Aloha! Hans

[Hans J Zeunert]

Hans;
Welcome to ToeQuest.

We have many forums here including religious and spiritual forums. The arguments that Tina mentioned only arise when members attempt to present religion in the science forums. Science does not recognize faith and testimonial evidences as proof; science philosophy requires observable empirical data. When any religion provides such data then it becomes science. We call the study of religions science, but that does not make religion a science. Most scientist also have a religious faith. I’ve never been able to find any “will-of-god” justification for the atrocities of neither humans nor nature.

Hi David,

Thanks for your input. In the meantime, I have posted my article "Introduction to the Unified Mind Theory" which may answer some of your concerns. People say: religion and science do not mix and I agree, unless both disciplines undergo some adjustment or corrections to become compatible with each other.

It amazes that more or less all religions, despite the teachings of Jesus, assume God to be some kind of a cruel monster one has to be afraid of, confined to a body, subject to time which is a dimension of His own Creation, wondering what went wrong with His Design, shelling out degrees of sin and condemnation on those who do not fit his standards. This not only is disgusting, it is right-out stupid and shows no brains. Similarly it amazes that Albert Einstein could not see the 5th dimension after he worked out his special and general relativity for a static 4-dimensional, never changing universe, and then learned about Hubble's findings that the universe has indeed been expanding, and that the further one goes back into the past, the higher has been its rate of expansion. As of right now, his famous graph shows recessional velocity to be zero. Einstein failed to see that an expanding, and consequently contracting universe is an absolute process which has nothing to do with speed limitations of bodies within space-time which is internal, and all indicators show we must be at its peak of maximum expansion. Here is our need for dimension #5 to measure our distance to the origin. We pull the term "absolute time" out off the garbage bin and give it a new meaning. Now can we see Creation in completion. This is so simple, a school child can see that. But your concern is: Can we see perfection in Creation as well despite man's cruelty to each other? Perhaps we bring this up for discussion at the forum level if there is enough interest. We would have to work with complex fields in absolute and relative time where all illusions balance or fall out, and the real component adds up and remains forever. Familiarity with Maxwell's Theory would be an asset. Hans

[Hans J Zeunert]

Welcome Hans.you are ın the rıght place at the right time.I send you greetings from Turkey.



regards michael.

Hi Michael,

Thank you for your welcome. Many greetings from Hawaii. You are right: humility reveals truth, and truth is expressed with boldness. Very good! Is truth female? I would have chosen "itself".

Hans