A Theory of Everything Based on Absolute Motion

[kenseto]

Hello, My name is Ken H. Seto
I am a first time poster.
The following papers on my Toe theory called Model Mechanics are available in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2. The Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. The Origin of Life as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
4. Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity.

http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

All comments are welcome. Thank you.

Ken H. Seto

[Profpat]

Hi kenseto;

Welcome to the forum. I've been a member for less than a year but have enjoyed this site very much. I hope you will also.

I didn't look at your links yet, but will in the near future.

You may want to transport this to a theory thread as right now it's in the introduction thread which usually doesn't receive much viewing.

Again welcome,

Pat

[dleviwing]

Welcome to ToeQuest Ken;
I developed the theory of “Absolute Motion” over 30 years ago.
Maybe you would like to review what actual “Absolute Motion” is. If you’re going to use my ideas, you should at least get them right.
http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/viewblog.php?userid=233

[kenseto]

Hi David,
What is your idea about absolute motion? Do you have a website that describe your theory? I read your blogg but there is nothing about what absolute motion is. Also I don't see how I used your idea on absolute motion to develop my theory. Thanks for reading my theory.
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken

[kenseto]

Hi Pat,
How do I transport my post to a theory thread ?

Thanks
kenseto

[Profpat]

Hi kenseto;

I'm afraid I am computer illiterate and don't know how. You'll have to contact Robert to help you on that.

[JAK]

Welcome to ToeQuest Ken;
I developed the theory of “Absolute Motion” over 30 years ago.
Maybe you would like to review what actual “Absolute Motion” is. If you’re going to use my ideas, you should at least get them right.
http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/...php?userid=233

This is a problem with our educational system. Professors must "publish or perish", but no work is being done to integrate ideas into a cohesive whole. There is no "patent clerk" researching whether any idea is new or not. As a result, the same old truths are just rediscovered over and over. For example, William T. Powers came up with Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) in the 1970s. PCT is just warmed-over stuff that Walter Cannon said in the 1930s. Another example is Antonio Damasio's concept of "somatic marker" which was the same as Victor Johnston's "hedonic tone" and my "emotive trace" from the mid-1980s. At least I had the decency to give credit to Wilder Penfield, who did not name the phenomena, but discovered and proved its existence in the 1940s. Finally, Dominic Masaro's Fuzzy Logical Model of Perception is just a re-hash of Selfrige's Pandemonium Model from 1959.

Who knows, your "Absolute Motion" might have a predecessor in the ashes of the library of Alexandria.

What you need, dleviwing, is better marketing - just what I need, too.