[dthawkley]

Thank you to those who maintain this forum.

I haven't looked into it very thoroughly yet, but from what I've read over the past few weeks or so, there is a fairly broad spectrum of thought. A lot of what I've read seems to beg the question: what is Everything?

My thinking is compatible with those who simplify by identifying and minimizing their presumptions. So what I'd like feedback on, initially, concerns the question of "where to begin". My working definition at this point is:

Everything must include any observation, but it is not necessarily confined to what has been observed. In simplest terms:

Whatever it is, it is not Nothing.

In other words:

Everything (as must include any observation) is not Nothing.

[dleviwing]

Welcome to ToeQuest dthawkley, from a former Ft Collins resident. (when cowboys still romed the streets.)

If you’re looking for a fundamental root concept of everything, you may find my blog pages helpful.
dleviwingBlog

[Profpat]

Hi dthawkley;

Welcome to the forum. One of my favorite spots is Rocky Mountain National Park. Truly God's country, I also like Lake Tahoe.

You are correct this forum is very diverse with theories. In fact after you review David's fine blog, you may wish to take a look at my An Idea;
( http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-t...2803-idea.html ). You'll have to access a PDF File.

Of course there are many more theories in blogs and under the thread " Your Toe Theory ".
I'm looking forward to your input.

Best,

Pat

[mkirkpatrick]

Welcome to the forum Dthawkley,greetings from both Turkey and the UK to you,hope you
quickly settle in and begin posting,no-thing amounts to all-thing when seen as a whole!



warmest regards michael.