It's time for time particles

[dipayankar]

Well you got me there Time Particle. But please answer my simple question. If time particles make up photon, then wont it be limited by the restrictions imposed on it by relativity just like it restricts the velocity of photon???

Keep it simple. Time's smallest component is a particle. This particle, by itself can move instantly from the tip of your nose to the center of the next galaxy. Ten time particles is a string forms one photon. Ten time particles in a stack form one graviton. And ten time particles in a circle form one particle of electromagnetism. Time particles attach together to form different elements in our universe. These elements may have wave-like qualities and so appear to be waves...

[dleviwing]

Hi Timeparticle;
Every month or two some member, usually a new one, attempts to resurrect the dead horse of “Time”. If you review former threads on the topic of time you’ll find that it will be extremely difficult to present anything new on this forum. Just review the old threads and see if you really wish to resurrect that dead horse.

About 97% of the people in the world actually do understand time; the other 3% seem to be gullible enough to believe the more complex mathematical term used in Relativity to actually be a real physical phenomena. Relativity has only to do with clocks and measurements, not the concept of time itself as an absolute.

BTW: Welcome to ToeQuest.

[dipayankar]

Agree with that post Dave... Relativity just shows us how time changes (dilutes?). Time is still there...

Hi Timeparticle;
Every month or two some member, usually a new one, attempts to resurrect the dead horse of “Time”. If you review former threads on the topic of time you’ll find that it will be extremely difficult to present anything new on this forum. Just review the old threads and see if you really wish to resurrect that dead horse.

About 97% of the people in the world actually do understand time; the other 3% seem to be gullible enough to believe the more complex mathematical term used in Relativity to actually be a real physical phenomena. Relativity has only to do with clocks and measurements, not the concept of time itself as an absolute.

BTW: Welcome to ToeQuest.

[timeparticle]

Well you got me there Time Particle. But please answer my simple question. If time particles make up photon, then wont it be limited by the restrictions imposed on it by relativity just like it restricts the velocity of photon???

Yes. Time particles in a photon, numbering ten, can only move at that restricted speed of light. But if one of the ten gets knocked off the string of ten, to make nine, the speed restriction has changed. The string now moves faster than light, and is light no more. What would happen if you squared a time particle velocity?................Big Bang!

[timeparticle]

Agree with that post Dave... Relativity just shows us how time changes (dilutes?). Time is still there...

Yes. Time does change things. In the physical universe, the matter, energy, space and time universe, couldn't it be possible that time is something more than just change. What if you could see time particles in your minds eye? You could then follow its direction, you could see how it flows into the past and into the future. You may see it attaching itself to another time particle, or watching how it separates itself from a string of other time particles. You may watch how it might dance with an anti-time particle and what that creates. You may study the three components of a single particle and observe how uniform in size and shape they are to others..... Yes, maybe it's time for the changes you speak of to change our formulation of time, itself.

[austintorn@aol.com]

I think that anything that moves creates time, even a 'time' particle, for time is mapped to a distance between where stuff was then (past) and where it goes when (now or future).

If there was a great stillness of no change, then no time would pass.

[timeparticle]

I think that anything that moves creates time, even a 'time' particle, for time is mapped to a distance between where stuff was then (past) and where it goes when (now or future).

If there was a great stillness of no change, then no time would pass.

Good. I like that. And you can enhance the definition of the map by studying time particle movements. Time particles already exist in our universe. There is plenty of time to go around. So, most all movements utilize the time particles that already exist. However, that is not to say one couldn't create them from... lets say... thought, or notion. A thought could conceive time. Most of the time, we seem to utilize what is already created, though. I would like to think that time is created with great realizations or epiphanies about oneself, others, or the environment.

[austintorn@aol.com]

There is all the time in the universe. It's just that I think that movement and time are the same.

[timeparticle]

There is all the time in the universe. It's just that I think that movement and time are the same.

Time and movement may appear to be the same thing. However movement may imply anything that moves, any matter, space and energy. But looking deeper, one might find other things that move, besides time. Anti- time, for instance, moves and is not time. Anti-time is made up of anti-time particles and may or may not react to regular time particle. Sometimes they come together to create a powerful reaction. Sometimes, though, they move on their own, almost ignoring regular time particles. This is movement, and is not time. Then, there are sub-time movements, if you will. Time particles, as well as anti-time particles, are made up of three components. Two cones and a time particle band are these components. The two cones float around in the universe freely. They pass by each other and an attraction is created. The two cones attach to each other at the small ends forming what looks like an hour glass. Then, the time particle band wraps around the small ends holding them in place. The time particle is created with movements, as you noted, but these movements are not quite time yet. This unique shape of a time particle can help it, as it attaches itself to other time particles, to create a string, as would many hour glass standing atop one another. Or, with this shape, a stack could be formed, like many hour glasses would be stacked crisscross on each other like logs creating a log cabin. So, movement seems to hold more than just time.

[austintorn@aol.com]

I would have to look through a powerful microscope to see if there were little hour-glasses there. How did you find out about them?