A belated howdy

[jag]

Greetings from a humble disciple of the spirit of truth. Thank you for putting up with me. I didn't mean to be rude.

I live in northwest Arkansas were, over the last 25 years, I have been experimenting with a machine that will produce and control an atmospheric vortex. Since this work is being done in my spare time progress is slow. My studies have shone me that, if a can create a vortex in the range of 300+ mph wind speed, I can nullify earths gravity in the area around the collapsing cloud. By influencing gravitons into my vortex I will create my own gravity field.

I became interested in superstrings, hidden demensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory after reading Dr. Greene's book "The Elegant Universe". The Calabi-yau space with all of it's many demensions seems to fit my theory of gravity.

I hit the internet to learn more about superstring theory and found this site. I just wanted to get some of my thoughts out there.
Peace, Jag


p.s. A good religion is a provable one.

[dleviwing]

I live in northwest Arkansas were, over the last 25 years, I have been experimenting with a machine that will produce and control an atmospheric vortex. Since this work is being done in my spare time progress is slow. My studies have shone me that, if a can create a vortex in the range of 300+ mph wind speed, I can nullify earths gravity in the area around the collapsing cloud. By influencing gravitons into my vortex I will create my own gravity field.

Isn’t that called a category 5 TORNADO? It only nullifies gravity up to a limited altitude and then you find yourself up-sh%#-vortex without wings and realize that gravity is still working. Move to Oklahoma and you can use one of nature’s vortices.

On a more serious note though, there are currently experiments being done with lasers to produce a form of space-time vortex which simply means a spatial density vortex produced with photons. To nullify gravity though, this type of vortex would need to be opposite that of a tornado. You should realize however, that gravity itself is a type of vortex process.

BTW: belated wellcome to ToeQuest.

[jag]

Hi David, Thank you for your comments.

I forgot to mention that my vortex will be around 3-4 feet in diameter at the top,which is the area I am interested in. Maybe 300+mph wind speed is overly optimistic, but say 2000 rpm @3 ft. diameter. This will give me a real event horizon to observe, at pressures much higher than an F5.

If I were foolish enough to move to oklahoma and attemt to fly a helicopter into the very top of an F5 tornado I might, If I could escape the event horizon and hover in the center of the vortex, be able to satisfy my curiosity about what is happening up there.

jag

[AntonioLao]

For stability like a helicopter you need not just a top-spin and also a tail-spin.

[jag]

Hi AntonioLao...Thank you for your interest in my little gravity machine.

I don't really understand all I know about helicopters but it seems to me that the tail rotor is necessary to stabilize the machine because of the extreme pressure caused by the blades on top pushing against the air.

In my machine the "top blades" will be be made of air and as the spin takes place they will be influenced into vortexes feeding into the larger vortex collapsing inward and downward. This machine will be using only thermodynamic force to create the vortexes of air.

What I hope is that, once I have a strong vortex of air, the gravitons that are moving down through the air and holding it to the earth will be influenced into my vortex creating a bubble in the flow of gravity.

If I can reach this threshold I'm sure I will be able to generate enough interest to build a machine using more powerful forces to influence the gravitons...magnatic and electromagnetic. Way beyond my very limited budget.

jag

[AntonioLao]

the gravitons that are moving down

Could you mean air molecules? The term 'graviton' is reserved for the quantum of the gravitational field in a quantum field theory. It is not yet detected.

[jag]

Hi AntonioLao,

I think it has been detected. These subatomic particals, moving through our bodys in mass, are what we feel holding us to the earth.

It really is a push, not a pull IMHO.

jag

[AntonioLao]

I think it has been detected.

then who received the Nobel Prize?

[jag]

Hi AntonioLao,

I think it has been detected.

jag

I should have said it has been discerned or percieved. I certainly did not mean proven.

jag

[AntonioLao]

I certainly did not mean proven.

The accepted term is "experimentally proven." There is such a thing as mathematically proven. Please note the distinction.