mike lawrence introduces himself

[mike@mlawrence.co.uk]

Hi, I'm Mike Lawrence. I have a TOE, which I would like people to comment on. I have tried to become an author, but have not had a reply to my request yet, and the page for asking questions/making comments does not work. The email is not confirmed as having been sent, or not.

So I'll descibe my theory, but you can find more detail at www pbtsm.co.uk ....... Hope you like it (also BTW, the site includes papers to journal standard (though not yet published) and I am having a 5 minute MPEG made to show how the particles interact to form quarks, lepton, protons, photons etc...).

It is presented in the form of a preon model, but it is a full TOE, called Ring Theory, on the website.

I consider a scheme in which all quarks and leptons are composites of only one type of fundamental object, with fundamental charges +1 and –1 differentiating particle from anti-particle. The concepts of mass, electric charge, spin, time, colour, and flavour acquire meaning only at the level of the composite systems. Gauge bosons, such as W± or gluons connect only composite states and are not fundamental and no Higgs particle or higher dimensions are necessary. The scheme accounts for several regularities of the observed pattern of quarks and leptons as well the apparent handedness of neutrino/anti-neutrinos and one possible mechanism underlying observed CP violation in Kaons. A new fundamental constant provides an indication that the charged leptons are not necessarily found in different flavours, but may be mass resonances of the same particle, composed of preons, which hints that the same may also be the case for the quarks and neutrinos. The dynamics provide a framework for the masses and magnetic moments of the quarks and leptons, including neutrino masses, and for the next level up, the protons and neutrons, as well as the possible composition of gluons. Group colour symmetries are given physical meaning and used to show that only 20 different mass sizes of symmetric stacks of 2 or 3 asymmetric composite particles may exist. The symmetric stacks, which are the next level of composite particles, all have integer or zero electric charge, and there are multiple isomers of all particles. The dynamics of the preons and composite particles are further explored and extended to show that charge and mass systems can be treated identically and that the expected charge and mass energies of atomic and planetary systems are recovered at low energies. The framework suggests a new energy that has not yet been proposed and that the combination of preon and anti-preon particles may form the underlying nature of space. The dynamics also suggest the location of quantum mechanical states within general relativistic systems, and how to avoid infinities.

Sorry for the mouthful.........

Thanks for looking
Mike
http://www.toequest.com/forum/images.../icon_cool.gif

[mkirkpatrick]

Hello Mike.welcome to the forum,greetings to you,I tried to access the link you gave
but it did not open! Hope you can fix it at your end.


warm regards michael.

[baudrunner]

The link is missing a period. Try this, Mike http://www.pbtsm.co.uk.

[analog]

Hey Mike,

Welcome to the forum.

If you go to Forums up top, then click on Member Articles, then choose which ever sub-forum you prefer (probably ToE Theory Articles), you can post your entire theory there with page breaks included, and you'll also have an endless amount of time to edit it. You don't even have to ask permission.

You can also go to Forums>Main Toe Forums>which ever sub-forum you choose (probably Your ToE Theory), and start a thread about it. Your posts there will be limited in size, so you'll have to make multiple posts if you want to display a large amount of your work.

You can also start your own blog here by following the blogs link.

You could also make an article with in-depth coverage of your work, and then start a thread (as described above) to discuss it with a link to your article, which would probably get you more recognition.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Tim

[mike@mlawrence.co.uk]

Guys, Thanks for all the help. The missing '.' in the address was deliberate, since some sites disable hyperlinks. So yes, use www.pbtsm.co.uk or www.mlawrence.co.uk since they have the same info. I'll also try to get up something short on the forum, rather than the whole thing. My last paper was 87 pages, previous about 50, so they are not short.
Cheers
Mike
http://www.toequest.com/forum/images.../icon_cool.gif

[MissChristian]

Interesting..and although I am still having a read through it, I wanted to make one initial comment. Your starting premise (from the website) is:

"I believe I have some answers – and they are simple in being based on splitting nothingness into two equal and opposite volumes – particles that I call ‘Meons’"

My question is...what is the nature of this "nothingness" you speak of. I think the key to TOE is gaining an insight into this thing called nothing, from which everything arrived.

Once we understand nothing, we will understand everything -i.e arrive at the TOE

Okay....having had read further, you do attempt to shed some light on the properties of "nothing"

I quote:

"Everything comes from ‘nothing’. ‘Nothing’ is quantised. ‘Nothing’ breaks into equal and opposite particles, called meons. Each unit of ‘nothing’ is a zero mass black hole (ZMBH). The underlying universe is composed of ZMBHs.

Space has always been unitised into ZMBHs, and they are the background on and through which everything moves."

This would also then (I assume?) suggest the opposite. That these particles -when fused back together -would form zero mass black holes.

What conditions are present to allow them to escape/break out?

[MissChristian]

Personal note//
look up
MEONS
ZERO MASS BLACK HOLES (ZMBH)
ZTES ("The Universe is a ZTES") ?

[MissChristian]

Okay, two things:

1) Meons: Are they measurable? If not, how would you explain/define them in relation to particles we know (including matter and anti-matter, quarks, leptons, mesons, etc). In other words, where does a MEON stand in the hierarchy of particles?

2) Symmetry (**see below): We know that the universe would have difficulty creeping/blasting (whichever was the case) into existence if it were not essentially asymmetric. This is because the assumption is that creation would have to lead to the formation of equal quantities of anti-matter and matter (which annihilate each other on greeting!) This in turn would lead to a universe destroyed within an instant of its creation. Your suggestion is that "[Meon] Spin hides the perfect underlying symmetry" This brings me back to my first question. Can you define a Meon in relation to anti-matter and matter. What makes it different. Where does it 'stand' in relation to what we know. (assuming we do not want to disregard what we know***)

***Inventing a new particle (and defining its properties -i.e. "Meons are the most dense particles possible" and "Meons are affected by the viscosity of space proportional to speed squared") is difficult to visualise or put in to proper context without understanding it in relation to KNOWN particles or well researched and understood entities such as matter/anti-matter with their associated properties and eccentricities.

**(Symmetry) What we currently "know" is that for true symmetry of matter and antimatter to exist, when any particle meets its antiparticle, they are both annihilated and energy is emitted in the form of gamma radiation. Of course the amount of radiation released by these collisions is calculated using none other than E=mc2 (where E=Energy, m is the combined mass of the two particles and c is the speed of light)

[mike@mlawrence.co.uk]

Miss Christian,

Thanks for the comments. To answer your two points:

This would also then (I assume?) suggest the opposite. That these particles -when fused back together -would form zero mass black holes. - Yes. That is what a photon is. 6 meons in one ring have each merged back with an opposite meon partner in the other ring, giving a double ring of 6 ZMBHs. Within each ZMBH one meon is chasing the other and the other is trying to move away from the first, so they accelerate up to the local terminal velocity of space (proportional to the density of ZMBHs locally), which is light speed.

What conditions are present to allow them to escape/break out? - I don't have an answer to that. Only that when they do, they must do so at the same energy for every meon, which is why the electrostatic charge is the same unit size 0, 1/3, 2/3 and 1 in all rings.

Hope that answers your points.
Cheers
Mike

[mike@mlawrence.co.uk]

Miss Christian,

Thanks again. I'll answer your latest points in order.

1) the size of meons is 1 in Planck units. They are not directly measurable because they only exist in rings of 4 or 6 (and possibly meons. There are no 'free' meons. They relate to our existing particles as the building blocks. So a ring of 6 meons could be a quark or a lepton depending on which way the meons are twisting.

2) I contend that the universe remains symmetric, even now. But that the total energy, which is at all times zero, has been turned from being individually zero for every ZMBH/meon pair into something that contains asymmetries within collections of particles. These collections are driven to try to form systems that have zero energy in total - our stable orbits of planets and electrons. There is absolute symmetry in the number of positive and negative meons separated out from ZMBHS - your matter and anti-matter, but these are NOT our normal matter. The latter is the rings themselves, all of which we measure as one typre of matter because the direction of spin of a ring has the same effect of deflecting space whichever way it is aligned. So we see all mass as positive - but this positive mass is composed of meons that come in 'fundamental' mass that is positive and negative.

3) The statement that 'a meon is the densest particle' comes from simple maths. If you pack a Planck mass into a particle of radius Planck distance, it will have a Planck unit density of 1. A 'normal' black hole will be around 10^-11 or less in Planck units. So a meon is an extremely dense black hole in its own right, and it is not possible to have a density higher than 1.

4) The viscosity of space and volume are inversely related through powers of mass. Difficult to explain simply, and only of use in Planck units.... mass is mass^1. Speed is mass^2. distance is mass^-3. Volume is mass^-9. Also works for voltage, current, magnetic moment, magnetism etc. You can derive all the fundamental relationships between properties by equating powers of mass. So angular momentum (h) is a constant (m^0) is equal to mass x velocity x distance = m^1 x m^2 x m^-3 = m^0. Viscosity is m^9. So viscosity times volume is a constant. So all meons feel the same retardation as the move. The terminal velocity is local light speed.

5) What you describe as matter and antimatter ‘annihilating and releasing energy’ is what I call the formation of a photon from a ring and it’s anti-ring. But these are not matter and anti-matter. These are both matter of positive mass.

Hope this answers your points. Thanks again for the comments. I have almost completed an update of my latest state of progress (although it’s a bit too long for this forum). When I have posted it on my website, I’ll send you an email.

Cheers
Mike