Hi Blackcrow;Originally Posted by Blackcrow
The scientific term for that is permittivity, however others call it vacuum energy, quantum foam, Aether, and spacetime; I think you’re the first I’ve heard call it god though.
If someone came to you for some lessons in gardening and proceeded to inform you that your knowledge of shrubs and flowers were screwed-up; would you provide any training without correcting their misconceptions first? I’m simply trying to correct your misconceptions and probably will do so in any science postings you may present.
Is saying there is no god any more blunt and presumptuous than saying there is a god? I think you are missing the point; it is not for others to prove someone’s conjecture is wrong but for those who make the claim to prove their claim is true. Authority figures like the pope are not proof of anything other than the gullibility of the human race; he’s just another CEO of a big company - One that doesn’t even produce a product; you know, something like Al Gore’s “carbon credits” company.
Now, if your theory is going to be scientific, then you will need to understand the fundamental rules for providing the empirical data needed to support the theory. Is the evidence you claim to have based on experience or experiments? Testimonials are only proof in a court of law, not in science.
Let me know if you wish to debate truth or belief. Belief to me, is just another word for convinced and has nothing to do with truth. The saying is “practice what you preach”; stop trying to be clever!
BTW: I don’t take myself seriously and neither should you. Just enjoy the banter.![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




