forward, backward, left, right, top, and bottom are all indistinguishable.
forward, backward, left, right, top, and bottom are all indistinguishable.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Sorry, AntonioLao, this makes no sense to me. Please try to explain it to someone like me, who is completely ignorant of your ideas.
A human being or for that matter any physical object should possess all these properties. Yet for a sphere, some of these become indistinguishable still a sphere should have a north and south pole if it does rotate on an axis passing thru these poles.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Hello neighbor,
Glad to have a fellow member from Louisiana. I'm from central Louisiana, about half way between Shreveport and Alexandria.
You'll find that the aether/ether is a common approach to a unification theory and ToE around here. So your views should find welcome discussion with many members.
Personally, I'm a materialist and subscribe to a material Aether theory founded by our local scientific engineer and fellow member dleviwing (Dave), which establishes a paradigm with a fundamental material substance with two properties of absolute motion and self affinity.
To get a feel of some of our interpretations of such concepts, I would recommend a quick review of his posts or mine. We are currently exchanging ideas at his "Toronic Concepts" thread with other exchanges in my old "Absolute Rest" thread, among other threads of his. I look forward to you joining our discussions or starting a thread of your own.
I hope you enjoy your time here, and if you need any help getting around the forum or anything, just let me know.
later,
Tim
Disclaimer: *The above statements are my opinion only and shouldn't be taken as factual. Read at your own risk*
Ether I do understand, or I don't...... Welcome Cajun. I am hungry for a blackened catfish, all the sudden.
Time uncovered brings new insights.
Greetings all,
Don't mind me. I'll just pull up a chair, pour a glass of Australian Shiraz and follow the proceedings, wherever they may lead.
This looks to have the makings of a fairly balanced discussion and debate.
Labelwench
Hi Cajun....welcome to the TOE. Interesting that you connect consciousness to sensation which could imply that the more sentient and sensory we are, the more conscious we are. I would definitely understand this. We are consciousness and I believe the ether is that part of us which is sentient consciousness....of course this seems to make consciousness of a more complex nature than is typically understood....
Mikal
Hi Cajun;
Welcome to ToeQuest. To add another link along with those provided by my press agent, analog,you may find it quicker to read my blog pages at Toronic blog pages
Hope you enjoy the forums.
David![]()
It's my pleasure to meet you, I hope we can remain friends.
God Bless You.
Rev Mike
What many call conciousness is nothing more than recall of sensations in the past and more importantly changes that we project into the future.
Sounds good to me, Cajun, as what consciousness is. Kind of like a "struggle" of different brain circuits trying to hold the stage for a second or two—as all sorts of thoughts come and go.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)