[jimscarver]

Hi all, I am an Information Physicist wannabe looking for the Truth of Everything. All theories are falsifyable and therefore wrong.

Unfortunately I could not find a Truth of Everything website and am duely impressed with the intelligence and open mindedness evident here.

My quest is to eliminate all aspets of theory, human concept or abstraction and discover howe nature really behaives based soley on measurement.

But I am human and believe the data sugests a logically constructable universe. So I assume constructability unless I find can a contradiction.

I also assume that nothing happens without cause.

While my assumptions may contradict theory, they are not thus far contradicted by the data.

I am the Information Police and enfose the Law that we do not embellish nature with any properties that are not evidenced directly by measurement and that we distiguesh the relative from the absolute and the fundimental from the emergent based on what measurement reveals.

Like many folks here, I am seeking collaborators in my endeavor.

My last attempt to present the model is at
http://WikiWorld.com/WhitescarverModel

I am working on a new version to post here based on activity in
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/InfoPhysics/

Where is the spelling check button?

Jim
http://InformationPhysics.com

[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by jimscarver

My quest is to eliminate all aspets of theory, human concept or abstraction and discover howe nature really behaives based soley on measurement.

Jim;
Why would you perform a measurement if you did not have an idea (Theory) of what you wanted to measure? Many times measurements have contradicted the original hypothesis, but we need to make assumptions before we can design the experiments and do the measurements.
I believe you may be looking for a fundamental paradigm of reality so we can accurately interpret the data obtained from measurements.
An example is the energy equation that states Energy is equal to the product of Mass (Matter) and the square of the velocity of light (Motion).
A simple statement that "Energy is equal to Matter in a state of Motion" implies that we cannot assign attributes to the term "ENERGY" for it is not an independent entity with its own properties and attributes as many have proclaimed. In reality, "mass" is not a proper term for the quantitative measure of matter.
What is required for true measurement is a paradigm of the ABSOLUTE properties of matter. This infers that matter is the fundamental substance of the universe.

Welcome to TOEquest
Dave

[jimscarver]

We do experiments to discover what happens.
Then model what happens.
We accumulate facts as probabilities of outcomes.

A generalized learning algorithum can be applied.

Generalizations are tested to determine the domain where they apply.

I try like mad to not have any theories but have very stong views on most everything.

All theories I know of have been falsified.

I suppose my current molel is a theory, but it is more like an intermediate result, I seek the simplest machine that accounts for the data by Occham's razor.

It is difficult to prove as it necessarily agrees with the data. All I can do is show how it agrees with both quantum and relativistic effects and hope to find collaborators as much o mathimatics and science must be reformulated in each new model.

I do need to deign experiments where the standard model is incomplete and the new model gets more complete results.

But I don't have a theory really, I just have known relationships unencombered by human ideas of how things ought to be. What emerges is an information system model, and like magic, nature appears to obey information rules. The constraints of our world appear to be logical, not physical. Only nature is the authority. All physical theories have anomolies and are therefore invalidated.

Jim

[dleviwing]

Jim;
You have adopted the proper state of mind; now you need to reduce all the irrational ideas of the "Standard Model" to create a pure paradigm that answers the mathematics of the "Standard Model" and goes beyond it.

Best regards;
Dave

PS; Cause is always before effect and most properties are interactions of matter.

[jimscarver]

Thank you Dave,

Can you help?

Jim

PS;You are correct but cause and effect are not always the same for all observers. See http://wikiworld.com/TheCaseOfTheElectronCollision
But in the macrocosm, indeed, all observers agree on cause and effect, time only goes one way by every experiment, forward, but it goes forward in every direction.