Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > ToeQuest Community > Introductions
Reload this Page My universe system
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
My universe system
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
Krzysztof Michalski is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
Thumbs up My universe system - 06-08-2005, 03:29 AM

Hi,
I would like to present my philosophical and physical view of my cosmic percepcion. I think, we are living in the biggest universe at the infinite mathematical and philosophical continuum. Even the oldest civilisation Sumerian belived, that the great- matter (NAMMU) was first of all. It represented two contrary, next were born sky (AN) and earth (KI), later would come the Gods of the man. Before the man turned the human, he walked on hands and feets. It was the first theory of cosmic and human evolution. About 6000 years ago...
I agreed mostly with this opinion. Everything were borned from the opposite thought and desire. Therefore we have dark and bright matter, matter and antimatter, quarks-antiquarks, gravity-antigravity, Big Bang-Big Collaps. Among them exists apparently the neutral world, full and rich of human sounds and gods from blood and bone.
Best regards Krzysztof Michalski

Last edited by Krzysztof Michalski : 08-15-2005 at 08:03 AM. Reason: Introduction
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
06-08-2005, 12:52 PM

hi Krzysztof,

I also believe that many things of the universe are based on opposites (although not ALL of them). Do you think the number or amount of each of the opposites is equal to the number or amout of it's opposite? If so, how? why?

How do you think then universe started (accordgin to this opposites theory)?

Just as an aditional comment, theories get better and better within the pass of time, not worse.....So the fact that you base your thoughts on the very first cosmological theories makes them quite un-reliable.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
06-09-2005, 02:39 PM

The question that bothers me frequently is that are the quantities of opposites equal to each other? If they are truly equal then no motion is possible. Systems cannot evolve out of perfect symmetry.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
06-09-2005, 03:24 PM

Antonion,

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Systems cannot evolve out of perfect symmetry.
Why?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
Krzysztof Michalski is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
Talking 06-09-2005, 03:48 PM

hi Guille,

hi Antonio,

There is no motion when there is balance on opposites. Thanks the surplus of matter we can exist. The universe is growing. The space is expanding with overlight speed ( still 45 billion years ), and the universe is 13,7 billion years old because the light speed is 300 000 km/sek "only". The space is still under inflationary theory, opposite to matter-energy. The great Einstein would be laugh for it.

See you tomorrow. Chris

Last edited by Krzysztof Michalski : 06-11-2005 at 02:08 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,308
Thanks Given: 724
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
06-09-2005, 06:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Why?
perfect symmetry is the same as complete randomness or maximum entropy or temperature is identically zero or maximum state of universal expansion or the heat death. see no info at http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/HeatDeath.html
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
06-10-2005, 03:17 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
perfect symmetry is the same as complete randomness or maximum entropy or temperature is identically zero or maximum state of universal expansion or the heat death. see no info at http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/HeatDeath.html
Thanks for the sumurized paragraph and the no info link. Although a good web page to learn about pathematics, physics, astronomy and chemistry, scienceworld.wolfram.com still has many many things not even started.

Last edited by Robert : 02-08-2006 at 01:12 AM. Reason: fixed broken link
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
Krzysztof Michalski is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
Cool 06-10-2005, 09:44 AM

hi Guille,
I would like to present my cosmic paraphrase:
" Haven`t I seen your face before? the God demanded, looking down at the man. " You have, Your Majesty," the man answered hopefully. " I helped your son to lift him, when he fell down." Ah yes recalled the God. The Earth number 111. Two thousand years!"

Regards Chris
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
06-10-2005, 12:55 PM

chris,

As an atheist, I ask you: what does god have to do with the scientific topic of cosmology?

As a member, I ask you to explain what the god meant about cosmology. Is it about that the Earth is not more important than other planets?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The god role.
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
Krzysztof Michalski is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
Thumbs up The god role. - 06-11-2005, 08:22 AM

hi Guille,

The biggest problem is to understand correctly the god role to create the material and spiritual worlds, which are filling mathematical and philophosical continuum. I told, there are many or infinitely more various universes with many variety material and spiritual states of matter- energy complexity. The great complexity appeared in our universe, in all probability exist many ( maybe 111 ) or more human civilisations. Unfortunately they can't communicate due to space - time difference. I think with determination, there were several intelligent contacts among human civilisations, and we earth people are the best example
( Sumerian and Egyptian e.g.). I don't think we are the lovely children of god. We are the product of evolution and the god is disinterested observer now. The Pole tell: the view point depends of sit point.
Chris

Last edited by Krzysztof Michalski : 06-11-2005 at 02:26 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Singularity As Separate Entity Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 11 02-08-2008 12:15 PM
Countability of space time curvature and the probability of the universe TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 4 12-13-2006 12:54 PM
The Universe is a Markov Chain TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 3 02-02-2006 09:03 PM
The probability of the universe TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 6 10-30-2005 08:04 AM
The Shape of the Universe Mohsen Cosmology Articles 2 05-26-2005 01:19 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com