+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: repulsive forces

  1. #11
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 17x in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    114

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    What distinctive properties distinguish one from another?
    Well that is an interesting question Antonio,I guess the answer to that would be
    vibrational rate.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  2. #12
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,852
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    223
    Thanked 261x in 205 Posts
    Rep Power
    110

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    that would be vibrational rate.
    A changing rate would contradict an assumption regarding invariant absolution acceleration.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  3. #13
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 17x in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    114

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    A changing rate would contradict an assumption regarding invariant absolution acceleration.

    One assumption is incorrect then,is it not?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #14
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,852
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    223
    Thanked 261x in 205 Posts
    Rep Power
    110

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    One assumption is incorrect then,is it not?
    Only if it turns out mutable.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  5. #15
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 17x in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    114

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Only if it turns out mutable.

    That is a great reply Antonio,wish I had thought of that!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #16
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,852
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    223
    Thanked 261x in 205 Posts
    Rep Power
    110

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    I had thought of that!
    I went back to the future and read your thought.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  7. #17
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 17x in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    114

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I went back to the future and read your thought.
    I thought I detected an intruder,but he had gone before i had time to light the gas lamp!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #18
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,852
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    223
    Thanked 261x in 205 Posts
    Rep Power
    110

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    to light the gas lamp!
    Should have turn on the black light so to see in the dark.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  9. #19
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 17x in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    114

    Re: repulsive forces

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Should have turn on the black light so to see in the dark.
    I had the feeling I was doing something wrong,just could not put my finger on it,(as it was so dark)?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #20
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 17x in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    114

    Re: repulsive forces

    What if there are no repulsive forces at all?Prehaps we misunderstand what we "think" we
    see and fail to make a vital connection?Energy is either spinning to the left or to the right,
    it is always spinning towards a imaginary goal,the operative word here is towards,now
    what if when we "think" we see the act of repelling,we are only actually seeing half of a complete rotation!It is just rotating through a complete circle,or prehaps more accurately
    a corkscrew motion.

    What I am really trying to get across is the in absolute reality there is just attraction,and
    within relative reality there is the illusion of repulsion?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. An Intro to what Supertrings are
    By james l. digol in forum String Theory
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 07-03-2008, 02:07 PM
  2. Philosphical TOE (draft notes)
    By Jamesh in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 06:27 PM
  3. The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
    By einstien3k in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-18-2006, 06:27 AM
  4. disoriented forces
    By AntonioLao in forum Forces of Nature
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-15-2006, 02:22 PM
  5. what goes up must come down
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 05:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts