LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksWell that is an interesting question Antonio,I guess the answer to that would beOriginally Posted by AntonioLao
vibrational rate.
regards michael.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 11 to 20 of 31
Thread: repulsive forces
- 01-24-2007 06:08 PM #11Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: repulsive forces Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-21-2007 04:07 PM #12Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,264
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: repulsive forces
A changing rate would contradict an assumption regarding invariant absolution acceleration. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-21-2007 07:17 PM #13Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: repulsive forces Originally Posted by AntonioLao
One assumption is incorrect then,is it not?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-22-2007 03:50 PM #14Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,264
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: repulsive forces
Only if it turns out mutable. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-22-2007 03:53 PM #15Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: repulsive forces Originally Posted by AntonioLao
That is a great reply Antonio,wish I had thought of that!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-22-2007 04:30 PM #16Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,264
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: repulsive forces
I went back to the future and read your thought. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-22-2007 04:35 PM #17Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: repulsive forces I thought I detected an intruder,but he had gone before i had time to light the gas lamp! Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-22-2007 05:03 PM #18Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,264
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: repulsive forces
Should have turn on the black light so to see in the dark. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-22-2007 05:12 PM #19Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: repulsive forces I had the feeling I was doing something wrong,just could not put my finger on it,(as it was so dark)? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-25-2007 03:59 AM #20Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: repulsive forces What if there are no repulsive forces at all?Prehaps we misunderstand what we "think" we
see and fail to make a vital connection?Energy is either spinning to the left or to the right,
it is always spinning towards a imaginary goal,the operative word here is towards,now
what if when we "think" we see the act of repelling,we are only actually seeing half of a complete rotation!It is just rotating through a complete circle,or prehaps more accurately
a corkscrew motion.
What I am really trying to get across is the in absolute reality there is just attraction,and
within relative reality there is the illusion of repulsion?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
An Intro to what Supertrings are
By james l. digol in forum String TheoryReplies: 30Last Post: 09-13-2011, 06:38 PM -
Philosphical TOE (draft notes)
By Jamesh in forum Your TOE TheoryReplies: 12Last Post: 01-31-2007, 07:27 PM -
The Grand Unification Theory of Forces..
By einstien3k in forum Your TOE TheoryReplies: 3Last Post: 12-18-2006, 07:27 AM -
disoriented forces
By AntonioLao in forum Forces of NatureReplies: 16Last Post: 05-15-2006, 03:22 PM -
what goes up must come down
By AntonioLao in forum CosmologyReplies: 4Last Post: 01-23-2006, 06:29 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
