[AntonioLao]

Why do these forces exist in nature? There are only a handful of these mysterious forces, the most familiar being static electricity and magnetism. Careful experimentations would always uncover their existence. Yet they are not obvious in day-to-day physical activities. Herein lays another mystery. Why do repulsions only show up at special controlled local regions of space? The most mysterious of all being the repulsion of strong nuclear forces at infinitesimal distances, while same forces become attractive at slightly greater distances, and beyond even greater distances, the strong nuclear forces asymptotically vanish to zero.

Although quantum chromodynamics (QCD see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics) was able to describe successfully many characteristics and properties of the strong nuclear force, it still could not dispel this repulsive mystery.

This enchantment will remain unless it is possible to explain it by superposition of fundamental uniform waves by the following given prioritized conditions for the phase angle differences:

• Even multiples of p radians, the forces are repulsive and time independent.
• Odd multiples of p radians, the forces are attractive and time independent.
• Even multiples of p/2 radians, the forces are sometime repulsive and sometime attractive therefore time dependent.
• Odd multiple of p/2 radians, the forces are zero and time dependent.
• If the phase angle differences are not multiples of either p radians nor p/2 radians, then the forces are attractive and time dependent.

[mkirkpatrick]

Attraction and repulsion are operations of the natural laws,confusion seems to spring from
imagining many,when we talk of energy,we would mostly agree that there is one basic
universal energy,and that it seems to be in perpetual motion,am I correct here?

What then of force?How would you define force Antonio,are there many forces,or just
one masquerading as many?

I tend to see the singular/ie,energy,or force,although I agree it is only to easy to assume
there are more than one.

Would not much of universal phenomena be simplfied if it was in the singular rather than
the plural.?


regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

The enchantment you mention,and the question of the repulsive forces,seem to be enigmas,and present a prehaps baffling picture,maybe if we understood better as to the
reason of being repulsed,if we as human beings are repulsed by say,family and friends,
we can if we are honest with ourselves,find out the reason for the pushing away from the
centre of the fold is.

What then is the difficulty when we lookat this phenomena outside of human interactions?
Is it a difficulty in language,and gaining a full description of the actions taking place?

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick What then of force?How would you define force

If there is energy there is force. In physics, kinetic energy and potential energy are both defined by the basic notion of product of force and distance.

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick What then is the difficulty when we lookat this phenomena outside of human interactions?

Human tendencies to repel each other are effects of pride and prejudice.

[mkirkpatrick]

Is there do you think a balance between repulsive forces and attractive forces,and if there
is,what is "it" that referees them?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Is there do you think a balance between repulsive forces and attractive forces

The state of a quantum vacuum is a dynamic equilibrium of primary repulsive forces and secondary attractive forces like gravity, em, weak and strong nuclear forces. Note that em and strong do sometimes act repulsively. These can only be referred by local infinitesimal constant accelerations of uniform waves wanting to be at the same place at the time. The result is the conservation of local infinitemal motion.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao The state of a quantum vacuum is a dynamic equilibrium of primary repulsive forces and secondary attractive forces like gravity, em, weak and strong nuclear forces. Note that em and strong do sometimes act repulsively. These can only be referred by local infinitesimal constant accelerations of uniform waves wanting to be at the same place at the time. The result is the conservation of local infinitemal motion.

Without a field of expression to interact upon(the etheric field)would there forces become
inactive,in other words,there would then be nothing to repel or repulse against?

What do you think?


regards michael

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick there would then be nothing to repel or repulse against?

Equal forces always repel and unequal forces attract. The difficulty is how to make forces equal at great distances. They ar equal at infinitemal distances equivalent to Planck length.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Equal forces always repel and unequal forces attract. The difficulty is how to make forces equal at great distances. They ar equal at infinitemal distances equivalent to Planck length.

That is an interesting question Antonio,"how to make forces equal at great distances"
Prehaps the very idea of "distance" needs revisiting,and possibly revising as well?
If we accept the premise of an etheric field,being ubiquitous by nature,there would be
no distance present,all would be in constant contact with all?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick all would be in constant contact with all?

What distinctive properties distinguish one from another?