You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Another question here is,will the full potential of form be realized,and what will that then be like?Prehaps this will bring about fusion at room temperature!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Only if I needed to do mountain climbing in the Himalayas. I'm still having trouble with form and potential, especially, the form structure of quantum space-time and the vector potential of electromagnetism.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Only if I needed to do mountain climbing in the Himalayas. I'm still having trouble with form and potential, especially, the form structure of quantum space-time and the vector potential of electromagnetism.
Try looking at just the potential,and ignore the form,see what transpires?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Mentally see a unifying principle,its there you know
Scientifically, there are two distinct energy potentials: the scalar and the vector. Where the gradient of the scalar potential is a force but the vector potential is already a force. Magnetic potential falls in the latter category. Yet magnetic monopole cannot be detected.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Re: form vs. potential -
02-26-2007, 06:02 PM
Linear Mode
