form vs. potential

[AntonioLao]

In the Aristotelean sense, form as structure or design is knowable. On the other hand, potentiality is not. Aristotle called absolute potentiality pure matter and absolute knowledge pure form. Although pure matter is not comprehensible, pure form as a mathematical structure is relatively understandable depending on underlying assumptions and definitions with empirically verifiable consistencies.

The important aspect of all mathematical structures is their defined dimensionality. In this sense, dimensionless quantities supposedly become the simplest to understand. Next, would be 1-dimension, 2-dimension, 3-dimension, 4-dimension, and so on and so forth in the order pf progressive complexity. For matrices, their dimensionality is indirectly determined by the number of elements. A single element is a scalar. 2-element is a spinor. 3-element is a vector. 4-element is a tensor. The magnitude of each element becomes a component of an embedding structure. The magnitude of the dimension of a scalar is zero, for a spinor is 1, for a vector is 2, and for a tensor is 3. However, the dimensionality of matrices with more than four elements becomes more complicated. Fortunately, study of symmetry using group theory allows groupings of elements whose magnitudes of group dimension do not exceed 3.

According to Aristotle pure form is eternal and unchanging, the prime immover. Relative forms, on the other hand, change according to four Aristotelean causes: material, efficient, formal, and final. This final cause is then equivalent to quantized space composed of fundamental wave forms that are all out of phase with zero value for group and phase velocity.

[mkirkpatrick]

Aristotle was a wise old sage,pure form is eternal no doubt about that,what shape
that form would be,well thats another question,I suppose for me it would be circular.

We see only ever the form,the very tip of the iceberg,there is so much hidden and as
yet unrealized.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

I suppose for me it would be circular.

How about doubly circular or two linked circles? This is the simplest knot structure in topology.

[mkirkpatrick]

How about doubly circular or two linked circles? This is the simplest knot structure in topology.

Sounds like a workable idea to me!


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Sounds like a workable idea to me!

But hardly convincing. What does it takes to make others buy it?

[mkirkpatrick]

But hardly convincing. What does it takes to make others buy it?

It would take an extemely good and positive salesman,who could convince even the hardest skeptic that this idea will fly,hell we will even supply the fuel free of charge!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

It would take an extemely good and positive salesman

Is there a school that teaches becoming this person?

[mkirkpatrick]

Is there a school that teaches becoming this person?

Not sure about that will search google for the answer?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Not sure about that will search google for the answer?

This might be the important of multiple moments, a title of a thread to be posted maybe tomorrow.

[mkirkpatrick]

This might be the important of multiple moments, a title of a thread to be posted maybe tomorrow.

That sounds interesting,multiple choices can be very confusing,so what about multiple
moments,do they signal a synchronicity that is upon us,resulting in an expansion of
consciousness,?


regards michael.