Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: zero amplitude

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    zero amplitude

    A necessary but not sufficient condition for matter wave packets to exist is zero amplitude. This must be true everywhere except in infinitesimal local regions of spacetime. Moreover, the motions of these packets never exceed a velocity of 187,000 miles per second. Another necessary but not sufficient condition is that every packet must be the superposition of infinitely many uniform waves whose reality could not be empirically verified but whose relative forms could be dimensionally structured.

    The structuring process could be as simple as adding or subtracting dimensions. However, at every level of existence (LOE) the maximum dimension is always less than or equal to three. Adding one more dimension would place the structure in the next higher LOE. Reading the book 1884 novella Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland) one gets a sense of how adding or subtracting dimensions is accomplished. Subtracting dimension is tantamount to zeroing the spatial extension in that particular dimension. Nonetheless, in one particular LOE no more than three dimensions can be subtracted. Therefore, the fundamental uniform waves of spacetime exist at a lower LOE, while they appear as waves of zero amplitude for beings at the next higher LOE.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: zero amplitude

    If one existed in flatland,or say zero dimension,you would what,exist as a point in space?
    Could you possibly interact with a being from say two dimensions?And if so how?
    If you folded up a line,would you then form a circle?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Could you possibly interact with a being from say two dimensions?
    two requirements are that the topological spaces must be simply connected and directionally orientable.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    two requirements are that the topological spaces must be simply connected and directionally orientable.
    So it would then be possibly to communicate with a being in two dimensional space
    if the requirements you mentioned were met!

    A small aside from this would be a medium communicating with a soul fromthe astral
    plane?What is the dimensions of that realm,I wonder?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    What is the dimensions of that realm,I wonder?
    I guess 4D minus 1D of space and 1D of time.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I guess 4D minus 1D of space and 1D of time.
    All these planes,dimensions seem to overlap each other,there seems to be a gradual
    vibrational merging from one level to the other.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    there seems to be a gradual vibrational merging from one level to the other.
    Not so in a quantum universe but it is possible in a subquantum universe.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Not so in a quantum universe but it is possible in a subquantum universe.
    What then is the barrier in this quantum universe?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    What then is the barrier in this quantum universe?
    The existence of absolute frequency, another upcoming thread title.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: zero amplitude

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The existence of absolute frequency, another upcoming thread title.
    Absolute frequency must then be the universal "base line"?





    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Where are the other universes?
    By Robert in forum Polls
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 11-03-2008, 05:39 PM
  2. making waves by 3C
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-06-2006, 11:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top