Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 4,734
Thanks Given: 535
Thanked 68x in 67 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 66 | k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 03:19 PM
This is the immediate knowledge zone. It is not hindsight nor foresight but insight. Hindsight is wisdom after the fact. Foresight is regard for the future. But insight is instant understanding of hidden truths.
The k-now zone seems to connect to every action. But does every action go through it? Could the thickness of the k-now zone be in direct proportion to the degree of inaction? Say, knowing too much can lead to indecisions. Given infinite choices can result into inaction. What would be the similarities between k-now zone and those forbidden zones or personal keepout zones: danger zone, smokeless zone, school zone, and erogenous zone? On the other hand, k-now zone is a welcome zone or keep-in zone. Good or bad, everyone wants to know. It can be done through formal education in schools. Or it can be done by streetwise experiences. But, in fact, in spite of big welcome mats at the steps of school entrances, many schoolers appeared less enthusiastic short of absolute coercion. Failure to enter k-now zone can create a lifetime full of inactions, indecisions, and poor or even bad choices in regard to life-threatening decisions: careers, marriages, social advancement, and individual freedom. Nonetheless, current events around the world clearly demonstrated the deficiency of k-now zone since many people are still found stuck in hunger zone, poverty zone, crowded zone, homeless zone, hospital zone, hot zone, cold zone, and even in the twilight zone.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
|  | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 6,984
Thanks Given: 322
Thanked 528x in 518 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 85 |  Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 03:39 PM
I know the twilight zone,not a place to dwell too long,I agree insight is the understood
perceived now,so very few live in the eternal now!
regards michael
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 4,734
Thanks Given: 535
Thanked 68x in 67 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 66 | Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 03:54 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick so very few live in the eternal now | Can you give some names?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 6,984
Thanks Given: 322
Thanked 528x in 518 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 85 | Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 03:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Can you give some names? | No! I would like to think that you and I do,but that would be deluded,would it not?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 4,734
Thanks Given: 535
Thanked 68x in 67 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 66 | Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 04:04 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick but that would be deluded,would it not | Not if we can continue this discussion in the here after.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 6,984
Thanks Given: 322
Thanked 528x in 518 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 85 | Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Not if we can continue this discussion in the here after. | Great gazooks my friend,we are here and NOW?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 4,734
Thanks Given: 535
Thanked 68x in 67 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 66 | Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 04:13 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Great gazooks my friend,we are here and NOW? | Just getting ahead of myself for the next million years. Really, do you think we are both in the k-now zone? Do we have a combined knowledge of discovering a TOE? I'm reading Paul Davis' book on Cosmic Jackpot and he promised to give an insight on the TOE. Will tell you what he have in mind when I finished the book.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 6,984
Thanks Given: 322
Thanked 528x in 518 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 85 | Re: k-now zone -
10-30-2007, 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Just getting ahead of myself for the next million years. Really, do you think we are both in the k-now zone? Do we have a combined knowledge of discovering a TOE? I'm reading Paul Davis' book on Cosmic Jackpot and he promised to give an insight on the TOE. Will tell you what he have in mind when I finished the book. | We are if we will it to be! Yes we have the combined knowledge of discovering a TOE,we
are both the very (em-bodiment) of it,are we not?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 4,734
Thanks Given: 535
Thanked 68x in 67 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 66 | Re: k-now zone -
10-31-2007, 12:10 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick we have the combined knowledge of discovering a TOE | As for Paul Davies, he persuaded the John Templeton Foundation to sponsor a workshop on multiverse cosmology at Stanford University. What foundations can we ask to sponsor a workshop for TOE?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 6,984
Thanks Given: 322
Thanked 528x in 518 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 85 | Re: k-now zone -
10-31-2007, 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao As for Paul Davies, he persuaded the John Templeton Foundation to sponsor a workshop on multiverse cosmology at Stanford University. What foundations can we ask to sponsor a workshop for TOE? |
What about Bill Gates,he seems a charitable sort of chap!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |
