[north]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

The secret of time= There
Is
Motion
Everywhere=TIME.

=Time =relativity=motion=relative illusion.

Absolute=no time=no motion=reality? Job done.




regards michael.

so is time more important than movement or motion?

[north]

Originally Posted by RascalPuff

_______________________

Short of absolute zero (unachieved, unobserved) there's always movement, hence, there's always time.

so movement is still the essence of time?

[RascalPuff]

Guess I missed a spin somewhere...
What happened to the interchangeability and synonymity of time and motion (and conversely)?

- Regards,
RP

[north]

Originally Posted by RascalPuff

Guess I missed a spin somewhere...
What happened to the interchangeability and synonymity of time and motion (and conversely)?

- Regards,
RP

there is NO interchangeability or synomymity of time and motion.

motion is the essence time .

time is not in anyway a force

time is a measurement of movement.

and the measurement , if absent , does NOT affect the movement(s) of things.

but the absence of movement affects the measurement of things.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by north

so is time more important than movement or motion?

Each is linked into the other,and are all equally important,although these are only relative
realities,they are in absolute sense-totally false and an illusion.




regards michael.

[north]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

Each is linked into the other,and are all equally important,although these are only relative
realities,they are in absolute sense-totally false and an illusion.


regards michael.

I disagree michael

movement(s) of substance is the essence of combinations which allow the existence of galaxies and life on Earth.

and this ALL happened well before our senses existed

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by north

there is NO interchangeability or synomymity of time and motion.

motion is the essence time .

time is not in anyway a force

time is a measurement of movement.

and the measurement , if absent , does NOT affect the movement(s) of things.

but the absence of movement affects the measurement of things.

________________________

Dear North:
I agree with what you're saying here.
Where's the beef?

[north]

Originally Posted by RascalPuff

________________________

Dear North:
I agree with what you're saying here.
Where's the beef?

in that it is fundamentally true , Universally.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by north

I disagree michael

movement(s) of substance is the essence of combinations which allow the existence of galaxies and life on Earth.

and this ALL happened well before our senses existed

Before consciousness?At great depth there is absolute stillness and ubiquitous
atonement,it is only on the tangible physical plane where the illusion of time and
space exist that there is movement and motioning.

Do we still agree to differ?



regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by north

in that it is fundamentally true , Universally.

____________

Dear North:

Could you please humor me and approach your intended contention in another way, here?

Best regards,
- RP