It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Philosophy > Logic and Reasoning
Reload this Page Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,423
Thanks Given: 85
Thanked 73x in 69 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-19-2007, 02:31 PM


Special Effects, Austin P Torney
Illustration copyright 1970 - 2007 by K. B. Robertson

* * * * *

POINT:

Marvin Minsky just sent me this absolutely brilliant and hilarious list--the "crackpot index" -- from mathematical physicist John Baez, formerly from MIT now a professor at UC Riverside. His Web page is
http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/and the crackpot index is at
http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
I hereby nominate Baez to be a presenter at the Ignobel Awards. He should give one out every year to the best theory of everything.
We receive these manuscripts (what I call "theories of everything") about once a month.
Caveat: yes, I know that outsiders to a field can make important contributions. But the chances of that happening are rather slim, especially when they meet many of the following criteria.
-- Michael Shermer


THE CRACKPOT INDEX
A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to physics.
1. A -5 point starting credit.
2. 1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.
3. 2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.
4. 3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.
5. 5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful correction.
6. 5 points for using a thought experiment that contradicts the results of a widely accepted view.
8. 5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawking" or "Feynman".
9. 10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).
10. 10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this were evidence of sanity.
11. 10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how long you have been working on it.
12. 10 points for mailing your theory to someone you don't know personally and asking them not to tell anyone else about it, for fear that your ideas will be stolen.
13. 10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds any flaws in your theory.
14. 10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of equations".
15. 10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it.
16. 10 points for arguing that while a current well-established theory predicts phenomena correctly, it doesn't explain "why" they occur, or fails to provide a "mechanism".
17. 10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).
18. 10 points for claiming that your work is on the cutting edge of a "paradigm shift".
19. 20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize.
20. 20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or claim that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).
21. 20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if they were fact.
22. 20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) ridicule accorded to your past theories.
23. 20 points for each use of the phrase "hidebound reactionary".
24. 20 points for each use of the phrase "self-appointed defender of the orthodoxy".
25. 30 points for suggesting that a famous figure secretly disbelieved in a theory which he or she publicly supported. (E.g., that Feynman was a closet opponent of special relativity, as deduced by reading between the lines in his freshman physics textbooks.)
26. 30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.
27. 30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).
28. 40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to Nazis, stormtroopers, or brownshirts.
29. 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike.
30. 40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.
31. 40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.)
32. 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.


Copyright 2000 by Michael Shermer and the Skeptics Society. Copies of this internet posting may be made and distributed in whole without further permission. For further information about the magazine and society, contact P.O. Box 338, Altadena, CA 91001; 626/794-3119 (phone); 626/794-1301 (fax); skepticmag@aol.com and www.skeptic.com or send your message telepathically and we will respond in kind.

* * * * * *

COUNTERPOINT:

The formal study of Contemporary Literature teaches that there are four principle contributors to whatever information may be contained in any communication, beginning with 1900... Since then, whatever a person may read in a book, see and hear in a movie or conversation is influenced by a singular or combined source-influence of one or more of the following men:

Charles Darwin

Karl Marx

Friedrich Nietzche

or

Sigmund Freud

__________________________

Time magazine's 1/1/2000 issue
features Albert Einstein as 'Man of the Century'.

Note, that he is not among the Contemporary Literature designated influences on thought in the 20th Century (1900 - 2000)...

Apparently Time Magazine has studied formal Contemporary Literature (as it is taught at the college level); read John Baez' "Crackpot Index", and taken it to heart...

Mention of Einstein gains five points of incredibility for anyone 'outside science' who says, writes, or otherwise employs his name...

Here we have a principle example of a non-sequitur (Aka, 'oxymoron').

Einstein is declared the 'Man of the Century' by Time-Life Inc., spanning the years from 1900 to 2000, but he is excluded as a world class influence by formal contemporary literature guides, only to be included - in John Baez' CRACKPOT INDEX - as a five point subtraction of credibility, for anyone outside the tight fisted innercircle of (desperately confused and perspiring) scientists.

Draw Your Own Conclusions.

(May I have a singular - minus five points of credibility - word with you, Professor John Baez, and Skeptic Society memberships.... besides, the outercircle name of *Copernicus or *Galileo, for *example...)

*Einstein.
('One beer mug')


Best regards,
K. B. Robertson
(World's #1 EinsteinGroupie)
Aegis to Albert - 'The Axe' - Einstein

http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RascalPuff For This Useful Post:
mkirkpatrick (09-19-2007)
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-19-2007, 02:43 PM

Thanks again Rascal,brilliant thread starter,lots of meat there to chew on,If I could choose
my "perfect" uncle,than Albert would be my first choice!





regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Green Belt
ScottAnfield is on a distinguished road
 
ScottAnfield's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 75
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 8x in 7 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep Power: 4
   
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-19-2007, 05:20 PM

Funny post RP
Well, it was until I realised I had 150 points! (only kidding)
Have to hold my hands up to number 14 though. I think 10 and 21 are the funniest.


Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them - Albert Einstein
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
1st degree Black Belt
bottomlander will become famous soon enoughbottomlander will become famous soon enoughbottomlander will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 278
Thanks Given: 5
Thanked 40x in 38 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rep Power: 8
   
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-19-2007, 07:51 PM

That crackpot index was posted as a fun stuff since 1998 and was cited by messages in internet discussion forums ever since.

I highly recommend the web pages of John Baez as the best available free online resource on hot physics topics with nice reviews/tutorials
make a lot of academic contents readable by science learned persons. http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/twfcontents.html

similarly, I recommend also http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/List_of_fallacy_pages to get rid of Fallacy,
http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/Science for Science, and
http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/Scientific_method for Scientific Methods.

Wish enjoy. Bottomlander
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Green Belt
ScottAnfield is on a distinguished road
 
ScottAnfield's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 75
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 8x in 7 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep Power: 4
   
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-19-2007, 08:19 PM

I saw this fallacy on the site you gave:
A is based on B fallacy - all penguins are birds, all eagles are birds, therefore all eagles are penguins

Would that be true of this statement:

All atoms have an electric charge, all atoms have a magnetic field, therefore all atoms have an electromagnetic field?


Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them - Albert Einstein
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,423
Thanks Given: 85
Thanked 73x in 69 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-19-2007, 10:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottAnfield View Post
I saw this fallacy on the site you gave:
A is based on B fallacy - all penguins are birds, all eagles are birds, therefore all eagles are penguins

Would that be true of this statement:

All atoms have an electric charge, all atoms have a magnetic field, therefore all atoms have an electromagnetic field?
_____________________

Dear ScottAnfield:
There are contentions for and against electromagnetic fields accompanying atomic systems (the electric and magnetic fields seem to consistently accompany one another); whereas, until further notice, the electromagnetic field (per se) invariably accompanies sub-atomic constituents of atoms; namely, the exemplary electron.

Incidentally, the Skeptic Society and John Baez-provided URLs/sites are excellent sources of cogent information, even when you may not agree with it.

Best regards,
- RP


(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
Tina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura about
 
Tina's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 804
Thanks Given: 68
Thanked 67x in 63 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Cool Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-23-2007, 07:57 PM

How about an anagram of Albert Einstein as code word so as not to incur points [TEN ELITE BRAINS]

or more contemporary [ELITE BRAINS.NET]
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tina For This Useful Post:
RascalPuff (09-23-2007)
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
1st degree Black Belt
bottomlander will become famous soon enoughbottomlander will become famous soon enoughbottomlander will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 278
Thanks Given: 5
Thanked 40x in 38 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rep Power: 8
   
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-23-2007, 08:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tina View Post
How about an anagram of Albert Einstein as code word so as not to incur points [TEN ELITE BRAINS]

or more contemporary [ELITE BRAINS.NET]
Dear Tina,

Good humor and good idea for this word game!

How about to put "A Einstein" just as AEinstein, whereas ether and aether are both used in physics.
Actually, many German/Greek words start with "e" are written as "ae" after the corresponding English translation.
(My follow-up work is really not so good as what you indicated as an anagram.)

Best Regards. Bottomlander
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
Tina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura about
 
Tina's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 804
Thanks Given: 68
Thanked 67x in 63 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Thumbs down Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-23-2007, 08:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomlander View Post
Dear Tina,

How about to put "A Einstein" just as AEinstein, whereas ether and aether are both used in physics.
Best Regards. Bottomlander
No - the smart ones would spot the ruse - need to be more covert than that.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'.
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
Tina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura aboutTina has a spectacular aura about
 
Tina's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 804
Thanks Given: 68
Thanked 67x in 63 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Re: Shattering the 'CRACKPOT INDEX' & 'Skeptic Society'. - 09-25-2007, 08:07 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomlander View Post
(My follow-up work is really not so good as what you indicated as an anagram.)

Best Regards. Bottomlander
There is a member with a name Notstein (I think that what it is) maybe he'll let you use It.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com