Conversation's with my Self. Feel free to join in.

[SteveA]

and then from directly in front of their three eyes

constancy -> changing of the change
straight -> bending of the bend
memory -> thoughts of thoughts
certainty -> uncertainty of the uncertain
reality -> the intangibility of the intangible
Euclidean space -> warping warped spacetime
positive -> negating a negative
multiplication -> dividing a division
unificiation -> separating the separation
acceptance -> rejecting the rejection

If we only have positive, there is no negative nor change nor time. If we have negative, there is both negative and positive and change and time.

-------------------------------------------------

The spiral - The cycle and the divergence - The circle and the line - the bending of bending of the bent - the divergence of the divergence of the divergence - not(not(not())).

----------------------------------------------

Matter and expansion
knowledge and change
(growth - direction - the unknowing of the unknown)
order and chaos
attractors and divergence (chaos theory)
cycles of primes (number theory)
information and interpretation (experience)
inheritance and mutation (evolution)
now and then (time)
subject verb (sentence)
constant change (velocity)

Notice that each of these constant components could be broken up into an inversion of an inversion and that the change of constant component would just be a third inversion, so these could all be seen as constructed from triplets of inversions giving identities similar to their initial form. -x=-(-(-x))

Though some operations may take more than a second application to cancel and it could be that a unique wavelength is associated with each of these (a binary duality is the simplest, but some processes may require more applications to construct a complete object and these might even be layerable into something with spiral characteristics).

(This idea has some interesting possibilities ... imagine various concepts described by a few periodic structures with relatively prime wavelengths. For example, if we had a duality and a trichotomy and both processes were applied at each time step, we'd rotate through 2*3=6 unique forms over time - object, change, new object, new change, third object, third change and than back to the original object are 6 steps of time (this would be similar to a triangle with 3 vertices and 3 transitional edges) ... though there's an infinite pattern here and it constructs virtual spaces larger than the time over which they're detected though it's very detailed and complex and the shape/form/complexity arising from this structure appears to be mirrored across a large number of fields)

[AntonioLao]

I still cannot find the hidden reasons why symmetric Hadamard matrices cannot be inverted? They are truly singular. On the other hand, the inversion of the identity matrix of any order reproduces itself. What is surprising for me is that taking any 2x2 matrix within a sieve of Diophantus would produce a fundamental matrix plus multiples of Hadamard matrices.

[SB_UK]

Notice that each of these constant components could be broken up into an inversion of an inversion and that the change of constant component would just be a third inversion, so these could all be seen as constructed from triplets of inversions giving identities similar to their initial form. -x=-(-(-x))

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Inversion.html






inversion center - O - the centre of the white plane (upon the white plane) of the dodecahedron I

pole - P' - the green vertex (of icosahedron I) above dead centre of the upper white plane

->- next dodecahedron II ->-
->- next icosahedron II ->- where ->-

pole - P - the vertex (of icosahedron II)

~or~
if that's not right

(at first impressions)

>P')Q>P
<- d ->

>icosahedron)dodecahedron>icosahedron

>line)circle>line

forming a spiral



if the line and circle are orthogonally arrayed
y
|./z
.- x

forming a spiral

... ... ... - z - (xy) - z - (xy) - ... ~etc~ ... ... ...

/
\

//
/
\
\\

///
//
/
\
\\
\\\

Spiral (side on)

formed from expansion based around unidirectional geometric duality of -(dodecahedron and icosahedron)n-

---> thattaway --->

- where ---> thattaway ---> represents the pattern of ripples extending out from a stone dropped into a still lake -
where the ripples become progressively weaker (in amplitude) -
with distance from the stone's entry point into the water

- where this relates to entropy -
entropy relating to the dissipation of the upset (structures) which resulted from an excess of energy introduced (stone) o/into the surface of the previously still lake.

[Meem]

I had a conversation with myself ... just the other day. I even thought enough of the conversation that I had with myself to quote myself.

"It is better to be a lucky fool than a deliberate one."

[labelwench]

One in six people are starving. That's over one billion people.

If each of the five who have sufficient, would commit to making do with 20% less, no one would need to be hungry.

Meanwhile, we continue our work toward renewable energy, conservation, and becoming better stewards of our shared home and resouces.

Regards,

Labelwench

[polarmedium]

Is this what it settles down to?
1. A look.
2. A life-style.
Forced to drown in details.
Forced to swim in a sea.
Forced memory.
"You can never forget…"
The poor, the needy, the suffering.
The Death. A human trail leading to the slime of tomorrow.

What war? What weapon? What tool?

All for your Self.

Well, at least you look good.
And I bet you live an exciting life-style.
Since nothing else matters.

Absolute Nothing. A base for mind to bounce upon.

Where am I going with this?
Eight Billion neuro-diverse individuals
and most know the name "Barack Obama."
1. A look.
2. A life-style.
and a Nobel Peace Pri©e.

Counter-lean: Jealous. Jaded. Jacked. (Bitter, bitter, bitter.)
Counter-counter-lean: Mans savage nature. The Human condition. (Complete.)

Beyond all that and a bounce along the way one question stands among the rest.
Is Obama a Good person?
Yes. Yes he is. Just for stepping up to the role as the role of President.
No, No he isn't the perfect man as we are led to believe.
And therein lies the answer.

Why are we being led in the first place?

The power is in each of our hands to change.
The power is in the hands of science. Every
individual with the power to do so should follow
mans savage nature, within rationality. That is,
the specific objects of evolution that matter.
The first, and always the first, being Our children.

How? Independent->Equal. Input->Output. Accept->Forgave.