Unfeeling logic
versus
Unthinking emotion
I'm pretty sure that the individual is predisposed to one of these two states
- and that with learning, pair-bond and time
- that the individual merges with his partner to achieve balance.
That the balanced state represents a kinda' reciprocal relationship with one's partner
- both being able (though reciprocally) to adopt either of the two 'states' of mind.
Tempted to suggest (purely based on feeling) that the extremes of emotion and logic (the two duals) which come together (in pair-bonded partnership) are also extremes in pH (internal)
- and that at balance -
pH neutrality is achieved.
Also tempted to suggest that failure in marriage occurs because the complex transition of pair-bonding is not allowed to proceed to completion
- that the (as and of necessity) extreme differences which exist between duals
(synergistic and not antagonistic as it often sometimes feels)
- that the antagonism which arises from the North and South pole of a magnet jostling for equal footing in the duality which they form -
- of two duals as one in stable duality
- that the 'stormy' conditions which prevail as extremes come to respect one another and settle into peaceful unity of duality
- that the emotional and logical sides of human nature
- are inadequately credited
- can be considered markers of an underlying biochemistry.
The stereotype of the Asperger's male
(Spock) meets the Hysterical female
(McCoy) have a well balanced (even if he is rather fond of the ladies

)
Kirk.