LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksthe domino effect to be discussed here is not the same as the one found in this website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domino_effect rather it is about number games and other mathematical recreations. Most will be found in volume 25 of the New Encyclopedia Britannica starting from page 1 to page 13.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: domino effect
- 01-05-2006, 02:59 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
domino effect
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 01-06-2006, 01:50 PM #2Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
1st up for discussion
1st question for discussion is what is it that makes the domino falls forever? A hint is Roger Penrose's endless stair.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 01-06-2006, 02:13 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Escher impossible figures
Two of my favorite Escher's impossible figures are the image shown below
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 01-06-2006, 02:27 PM #4Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
for engineers
Are there any engineer who can fabricate the object from the blueprint below?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 01-07-2006, 01:26 PM #5The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
These are great. I hate the sort of non-ending spatially-unlogical problems like Penrose's stairs.
Maybe all those figures make sense in a higher LOE?
- 01-07-2006, 04:00 PM #6Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
dimensional crossing?
I thought so too. Maybe some dimensional crossings?
Originally Posted by GUILLE Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Let's get this party started!
By Robert in forum Anecdotal StoriesReplies: 12Last Post: 03-10-2006, 10:29 AM -
chasing the 1.7 cm effect
By AntonioLao in forum General PhysicsReplies: 1Last Post: 02-28-2006, 01:19 PM -
Could we derive relativistic Doppler Effect for sound wave?
By vacuum-mechanics in forum RelativityReplies: 13Last Post: 10-17-2005, 01:22 AM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
