The advent of classical thermodynamics also has its demonic possession, this time it is called Maxwell's demon described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
The advent of classical thermodynamics also has its demonic possession, this time it is called Maxwell's demon described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Is there any connection between the laplacian and the maxwellian demon?
Antonio,how do you think the expression"fair exchange is no robbery"wouldfit into this equasion?Or wouldOriginally Posted by AntonioLao
it not!Any thoughts on this.
kind regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
In classical thermodynamics a fair exchange would imply equal probability for an evolution of two given systems. The final state is chemical equilibrium but not necessarily mechanical equilibrium. Both mass and energy are conserved not destroyed.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Laplace's demon is for Newtonian mechanics while Maxwell's demon is for heat mechanics or classical thermodynamics. Both are just thought experiments for their respective inventors.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)