Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    the Maxwellian demon

    The advent of classical thermodynamics also has its demonic possession, this time it is called Maxwell's demon described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Is there any connection between the laplacian and the maxwellian demon?

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The advent of classical thermodynamics also has its demonic possession, this time it is called Maxwell's demon described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
    Antonio,how do you think the expression"fair exchange is no robbery"wouldfit into this equasion?Or would
    it not!Any thoughts on this.

    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    fair is fair

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    the expression"fair exchange is no robbery"wouldfit
    In classical thermodynamics a fair exchange would imply equal probability for an evolution of two given systems. The final state is chemical equilibrium but not necessarily mechanical equilibrium. Both mass and energy are conserved not destroyed.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Is there any connection between the laplacian and the maxwellian demon?
    Laplace's demon is for Newtonian mechanics while Maxwell's demon is for heat mechanics or classical thermodynamics. Both are just thought experiments for their respective inventors.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. the Laplacian demon
    By AntonioLao in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-15-2006, 08:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top