seeing and believing

[AntonioLao]

Within mathematical limit, seeing and believing are respectively equivalent to projective and conformal transformation.

In projective geometry the invariance are properties of configurations or shapes, for example, a person remains a person at temporal zero and spatial infinity instead of changing into a whale with no arm and no leg but fin and tail. In conformal mapping, angles and directions remain invariant at spatial zero and temporal infinity, for example, a person facing east remains facing east at temporal infinity. Both attributes of projective and conformal are applicable to the structure of space-time as its homogeneity and isotropy.

[mkirkpatrick]

Within mathematical limit, seeing and believing are respectively equivalent to projective and conformal transformation.

In projective geometry the invariance are properties of configurations or shapes, for example, a person remains a person at temporal zero and spatial infinity instead of changing into a whale with no arm and no leg but fin and tail. In conformal mapping, angles and directions remain invariant at spatial zero and temporal infinity, for example, a person facing east remains facing east at temporal infinity. Both attributes of projective and conformal are applicable to the structure of space-time as its homogeneity and isotropy.

Do you always believe what you see!Or see what you want to believe?By the way
Antonio,If you were on say mars,would there still be east and west!

kind regardsmichael.

[AntonioLao]

Do you always believe what you see!Or see what you want to believe?

Mathematically speaking, seeing and believing based on the abstractions of M. C. Escher's lithographs.