Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    equality or not – that is the question

    Are there equality in the absolute sense of the word? Or in a lesser vein, can there be relative equality? In mathematics, two numbers are equal if their difference is zero assuming both positives. If one is negative then equality is determine by the zero difference of their absolute values. For vector quantities, their magnitudes can be equal while still each vector holds a unique direction in space-time.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile glamour clouds our vision

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Are there equality in the absolute sense of the word? Or in a lesser vein, can there be relative equality? In mathematics, two numbers are equal if their difference is zero assuming both positives. If one is negative then equality is determine by the zero difference of their absolute values. For vector quantities, their magnitudes can be equal while still each vector holds a unique direction in space-time.
    Yes there is equality in the absolute sense
    of the word.in the relative sense there is also equality,but it is not sensed to
    be,there seems to be a glamour blinding the onlooker?
    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Yes there is equality in the absolute sense of the word.
    Could you please provide an example to go with this assertion. Thanks.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #4
    Yellow Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    17
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Could you please provide an example to go with this assertion. Thanks.
    Couple years ago, this was the question that I discussed with my IB student. We have thought about two months and we concluded that there cannot be two things which are totally equal with all properties of them. So, equality is relative and is related with the aspect you look.

    Even now, I think on this question if I remember, in a bus, at walking, eating...
    And I am still very curious on this question, too. If somebody finds an example, please share...

    Regards...

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile are wemore equal than a cactus plnt.

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Could you please provide an example to go with this assertion. Thanks.
    Yes.Absolute equality applies to All life.Life by
    its very nature Aliveness,is equal,how could it possibly be otherwise?To say
    otherwise would imply that somethings are less than otherthings,and that
    is absurd if you accept that we are talking about life,of course thisis at the
    inner,essence of it,outwardly ofcourse you could say that youhad more
    freedom of movement than say a cactus plant,but you would both be equal
    in that you were Life!

    kindest regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #6
    Brown Belt
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    146
    Thanks Given
    6
    Thanked 14x in 11 Posts
    Rep Power
    27
    It seems there are multiple definitions of equality.

    1) Within an idealized framework, can we consider to things equal? If we define in an idealized framework that two things can be, or are, equal, then they are equal, by definition. However, this may not be what you are getting at.

    2) Are there equal things within the physical environment? Now we seem to be asking- is the physical environment composed of items that exist as a form of an idealized framework? Is physical reality a manifestation of a platonic ideal? For instance- are any two atoms actually the same? It seems that they may or may not be- but this is the heart of your question, at least in the simplest form. If an atom has a "half life" and may decay, is it the same as another atom which was formed at a different time, but is the same in all other respects? I am not sure what physics say about these two atoms- is one more likely to decay than the other because of different initial start times, or not? Perhaps this answer is unknown as well.

    Now as soon as you consider a larger object- say a penny- are any two pennies equal? Obviously they are microscopically different. But as far as their interaction in the environment, it would appear that they are identical for human purposes. If the penny only functions within the human sphere, perhaps they are identical after all.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by TinyTree
    It seems there are multiple definitions of equality.

    1) Within an idealized framework, can we consider to things equal? If we define in an idealized framework that two things can be, or are, equal, then they are equal, by definition. However, this may not be what you are getting at.

    2) Are there equal things within the physical environment? Now we seem to be asking- is the physical environment composed of items that exist as a form of an idealized framework? Is physical reality a manifestation of a platonic ideal? For instance- are any two atoms actually the same? It seems that they may or may not be- but this is the heart of your question, at least in the simplest form. If an atom has a "half life" and may decay, is it the same as another atom which was formed at a different time, but is the same in all other respects? I am not sure what physics say about these two atoms- is one more likely to decay than the other because of different initial start times, or not? Perhaps this answer is unknown as well.

    Now as soon as you consider a larger object- say a penny- are any two pennies equal? Obviously they are microscopically different. But as far as their interaction in the environment, it would appear that they are identical for human purposes. If the penny only functions within the human sphere, perhaps they are identical after all.
    Wee all have to spend a penny
    sometimes Tinytree!
    kindestregards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #8
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool Equality or equity...

    Maybe the key to equality or equity is in how we define value? using the penny example, they are all equal, because their individual values are all equal. doesn't mean their the same. What if one penny was given from a mother to her daughter right before the titanic sank and only the daughter survived? Different value. Therefore not equal. this is why I love the Mandelbrot. Instead of thinking in terms of equations (which can be misleading), we need to retrain to think in terms of becoming.
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    qualitative and quantitative

    Equality could be separated into qualitative and quantitative aspect. There should be general agreement that qualitative equality is possible such as freedom and human rights. But quantitative equality is very difficult to ascertain or to measure.
    Last edited by AntonioLao; 02-20-2006 at 12:35 PM. Reason: typos
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ask the Answer
    By WithoutMe in forum Logic and Reasoning
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 04:09 AM
  2. Abstraction and consciousness.
    By socratus in forum Logic and Reasoning
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-19-2006, 12:05 AM
  3. fractal equality (freedom)
    By AntonioLao in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-22-2006, 01:58 PM
  4. Question.
    By socratus in forum Spacetime
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-20-2006, 10:02 AM
  5. the question of faith
    By subversion in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 08:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top