Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page equality or not – that is the question
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
equality or not – that is the question
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
equality or not – that is the question - 02-15-2006, 02:07 PM

Are there equality in the absolute sense of the word? Or in a lesser vein, can there be relative equality? In mathematics, two numbers are equal if their difference is zero assuming both positives. If one is negative then equality is determine by the zero difference of their absolute values. For vector quantities, their magnitudes can be equal while still each vector holds a unique direction in space-time.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
glamour clouds our vision
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile glamour clouds our vision - 02-15-2006, 07:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Are there equality in the absolute sense of the word? Or in a lesser vein, can there be relative equality? In mathematics, two numbers are equal if their difference is zero assuming both positives. If one is negative then equality is determine by the zero difference of their absolute values. For vector quantities, their magnitudes can be equal while still each vector holds a unique direction in space-time.
Yes there is equality in the absolute sense
of the word.in the relative sense there is also equality,but it is not sensed to
be,there seems to be a glamour blinding the onlooker?
kind regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
02-16-2006, 12:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Yes there is equality in the absolute sense of the word.
Could you please provide an example to go with this assertion. Thanks.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
apuasua is on a distinguished road
 
apuasua's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 17
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
02-18-2006, 04:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Could you please provide an example to go with this assertion. Thanks.
Couple years ago, this was the question that I discussed with my IB student. We have thought about two months and we concluded that there cannot be two things which are totally equal with all properties of them. So, equality is relative and is related with the aspect you look.

Even now, I think on this question if I remember, in a bus, at walking, eating...
And I am still very curious on this question, too. If somebody finds an example, please share...

Regards...
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
are wemore equal than a cactus plnt.
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile are wemore equal than a cactus plnt. - 02-18-2006, 08:46 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Could you please provide an example to go with this assertion. Thanks.
Yes.Absolute equality applies to All life.Life by
its very nature Aliveness,is equal,how could it possibly be otherwise?To say
otherwise would imply that somethings are less than otherthings,and that
is absurd if you accept that we are talking about life,of course thisis at the
inner,essence of it,outwardly ofcourse you could say that youhad more
freedom of movement than say a cactus plant,but you would both be equal
in that you were Life!

kindest regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Blue Belt
TinyTree has a spectacular aura about
 
TinyTree's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 132
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep Power: 13
   
02-18-2006, 09:05 PM

It seems there are multiple definitions of equality.

1) Within an idealized framework, can we consider to things equal? If we define in an idealized framework that two things can be, or are, equal, then they are equal, by definition. However, this may not be what you are getting at.

2) Are there equal things within the physical environment? Now we seem to be asking- is the physical environment composed of items that exist as a form of an idealized framework? Is physical reality a manifestation of a platonic ideal? For instance- are any two atoms actually the same? It seems that they may or may not be- but this is the heart of your question, at least in the simplest form. If an atom has a "half life" and may decay, is it the same as another atom which was formed at a different time, but is the same in all other respects? I am not sure what physics say about these two atoms- is one more likely to decay than the other because of different initial start times, or not? Perhaps this answer is unknown as well.

Now as soon as you consider a larger object- say a penny- are any two pennies equal? Obviously they are microscopically different. But as far as their interaction in the environment, it would appear that they are identical for human purposes. If the penny only functions within the human sphere, perhaps they are identical after all.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile 02-18-2006, 09:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TinyTree
It seems there are multiple definitions of equality.

1) Within an idealized framework, can we consider to things equal? If we define in an idealized framework that two things can be, or are, equal, then they are equal, by definition. However, this may not be what you are getting at.

2) Are there equal things within the physical environment? Now we seem to be asking- is the physical environment composed of items that exist as a form of an idealized framework? Is physical reality a manifestation of a platonic ideal? For instance- are any two atoms actually the same? It seems that they may or may not be- but this is the heart of your question, at least in the simplest form. If an atom has a "half life" and may decay, is it the same as another atom which was formed at a different time, but is the same in all other respects? I am not sure what physics say about these two atoms- is one more likely to decay than the other because of different initial start times, or not? Perhaps this answer is unknown as well.

Now as soon as you consider a larger object- say a penny- are any two pennies equal? Obviously they are microscopically different. But as far as their interaction in the environment, it would appear that they are identical for human purposes. If the penny only functions within the human sphere, perhaps they are identical after all.
Wee all have to spend a penny
sometimes Tinytree!
kindestregards michael


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Equality or equity...
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 19
   
Cool Equality or equity... - 02-18-2006, 10:17 PM

Maybe the key to equality or equity is in how we define value? using the penny example, they are all equal, because their individual values are all equal. doesn't mean their the same. What if one penny was given from a mother to her daughter right before the titanic sank and only the daughter survived? Different value. Therefore not equal. this is why I love the Mandelbrot. Instead of thinking in terms of equations (which can be misleading), we need to retrain to think in terms of becoming.


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
qualitative and quantitative
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
qualitative and quantitative - 02-20-2006, 12:33 PM

Equality could be separated into qualitative and quantitative aspect. There should be general agreement that qualitative equality is possible such as freedom and human rights. But quantitative equality is very difficult to ascertain or to measure.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

Last edited by AntonioLao : 02-20-2006 at 12:35 PM. Reason: typos
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Abstraction and consciousness. socratus Logic and Reasoning 22 10-19-2006 12:05 AM
Ask the Answer WithoutMe Logic and Reasoning 1 04-20-2006 06:10 AM
fractal equality (freedom) AntonioLao Mathematics 2 03-22-2006 01:58 PM
Question. socratus Spacetime 11 02-20-2006 10:02 AM
the question of faith subversion General Discussion 16 12-06-2005 08:09 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com